Synlett 2015; 26(07): 891-896
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1380187
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

[1,4]-Aza-Brook Rearrangement for Efficient Formation of Benzynes and Their Cycloaddition

Ze-Ao Huang
a   The Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Chemistry of Arid Zones, Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, P. R. of China
,
Fan Tang
b   Department of Chemistry and Applied Chemistry, Changji University, Changji 831100, P. R. of China   Email: clu@ms.xjb.ac.cn
,
Yan-Jun Xu
a   The Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Chemistry of Arid Zones, Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, P. R. of China
,
Chong-Dao Lu*
a   The Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Chemistry of Arid Zones, Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, P. R. of China
b   Department of Chemistry and Applied Chemistry, Changji University, Changji 831100, P. R. of China   Email: clu@ms.xjb.ac.cn
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 19 December 2014

Accepted after revision: 07.02.105

Publication Date:
27 February 2015 (online)


Abstract

An efficient benzyne cycloaddition triggered by an aza-Brook rearrangement is reported. In this reaction, 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl triflates bearing a benzylic secondary amine group at the 3-position undergo base-promoted [1,4]-carbon-to-nitrogen silyl migration (aza-Brook rearrangement) to generate benzyne intermediates, which are then trapped by intermolecular or intramolecular cycloaddition involving 1,3-dienes or 1,3-dipoles. This procedure furnishes various cycloadducts in yields of up to 99%.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Brook AG. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974; 7: 77

    • For reviews, see:
    • 2a Bulman Page PC, Klair SS, Rosenthal S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1990; 19: 147
    • 2b Moser WH. Tetrahedron 2001; 57: 2065
    • 2c Boyce GR, Greszler SN, Johnson JS, Linghu X, Malinowski JT, Nicewicz DA, Satterfield AD, Schmitt DC, Steward KM. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 4503

      For selected examples, see:
    • 3a Chen MZ, Gutierrez O, Smith AB. III. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 1279
    • 3b Smith AB. III, Hoye AT, Martinez-Solorio D, Kim W.-S, Tong R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 4533
    • 3c Smith AB. III, Xian M, Kim W.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 12368
    • 3d Smith AB. III, Xian M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 66
    • 3e Smith AB. III, Pitram SM, Boldi AM, Gaunt MJ, Sfouggatakis C, Moser WH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 14435
  • 4 Smith AB. III, Sfouggatakis C, Risatti CA, Sperry JB, Zhu W, Doughty VA, Gotchev DB, Sakamoto S, Tomioka T, Bennett CS, Shirakami S, Bauer D, Takeuchi M, Koyanagi J, Sakamoto Y. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 6489
    • 5a Moser WH, Endsley KE, Colyer JT. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 717
    • 5b Moser WH, Zhang J, Lecher CS, Frazier TL, Pink M. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 1981
    • 6a Taguchi H, Takami K, Tsubouchi A, Takeda T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 429
    • 6b Smith AB. III, Kim W.-S, Wuest WM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 7082
    • 6c Smith AB. III, Kim W.-S, Tong R. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 588
    • 6d Sanchez L, Smith AB. III. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 6314
    • 7a Bures E, Spinazze PG, Beese G, Hunt IR, Roger C, Keay BA. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 8741
    • 7b Devarie-Baez NO, Shuhler BJ, Wang H, Xian M. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 4655
  • 8 Smith AB. III, Kim W.-S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011; 108: 6787
  • 10 Wittenberg D, George MV, Wu TC, Miles DH, Gilman H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958; 80: 4532
    • 11a Brook AG, Duff JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974; 96: 4692
    • 11b Duff JM, Brook AG. Can. J. Chem. 1977; 55: 2589

      For examples of [1,2]-aza-Brook rearrangement, see:
    • 12a Suginome M, Fukuda T, Ito Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002; 643–644: 508
    • 12b Honda T, Mori M. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 1196
    • 12c Shimizu M, Takao Y, Katsurayama H, Mizota I. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2013; 2: 130

      For examples of retro-[1,2]-aza-Brook rearrangement, see:
    • 13a Sieburth SM, O’Hare HK, Xu J, Chen Y, Liu G. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 1859
    • 13b Liu G, Sieburth SM. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 4677

      For examples of [1,3]-aza-Brook rearrangement, see:
    • 14a Fuji K, Ueda M, Sumi K, Fujita E. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 662
    • 14b Page PC. B, van Niel MB, Westwood D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988; 269
    • 14c Cunico RF, Kuan CP. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 4634
    • 14d Cunico RF, Kuan CP. J. Org. Chem. 1992; 57: 3331
    • 14e Yagi K, Tsuritani T, Takami K, Shinokubo H, Oshima K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 8618
  • 15 For examples of silyl rearrangement from oxygen (or nitrogen) to nitrogen, see: Bailey RE, West R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964; 86: 5369 ; and ref. 14c,d
    • 16a Ballweg DM, Miller RC, Gray DL, Scheidt KA. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 1403
    • 16b Nielsen L, Lindsay KB, Faber J, Nielsen NC, Skrydstrup T. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 10035
    • 16c Vyas DJ, Frohlich R, Oestreich M. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2094
    • 16d Hensel A, Nagura K, Delvos LB, Oestreich M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 4964
    • 16e Mita T, Sugawara M, Saito K, Sato Y. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 3028
  • 17 For an example of using [1,5]-O→O silyl transfer to replace [1,4]-O→N silyl transfer, see: Garrett MR, Tarr JC, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 12944
  • 18 The observation of the failure of the amine 5e to undergo the described transformations rules out another possible reaction pathway involving a direct Si–metal exchange reaction of the starting materials with KHMDS.
  • 19 For the amine 5e, replacing KHMDS with n-BuLi or n-BuLi/HMPA did not give positive results. In contrast, n-BuLi was effective at initiating the cascade transformation of 5h (see Scheme 4).

    • For reviews of tert-butanesulfinamide, see:
    • 20a Ferreira F, Botuha C, Chemla F, Perez-Luna A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 1162
    • 20b Robak MT, Herbage MA, Ellman JA. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 3600
  • 21 Lower yields were obtained when KHMDS was used with the solvents toluene (81% yield), diethyl ether (77%), or dichloromethane (72%).

    • TBAF (tetrabutylammonium fluoride) and TBAT (tetrabutylammonium triphenyldifluorosilicate) were also examined to promote the reaction of 5a with 2,5-dimethylfuran at r.t., after complete consumption of 5a, the cycloadduct 6a was obtained in 42% and 45% yields, respectively. For selected recent reviews of arynes, see:
    • 22a Dubrovskiy AV, Markina NA, Larock RC. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013; 11: 191
    • 22b Bhunia A, Yetra SR, Biju AT. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 3140
    • 22c Tadross PM, Stoltz BM. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 3550
    • 22d Gampe CM, Carreira EM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 3766
    • 22e Kitamura T. Aust. J. Chem. 2010; 63: 987
  • 23 General Procedure for Benzyne Cycloadditions with Dienes or 1,3-Dipoles To a solution of silyl triflate (0.20 mmol) and dienes or 1,3-dipoles (1.00 mmol) in anhydrous THF (2 mL) under argon atmosphere at –78 °C was added KHMDS (0.50 M in toluene, 0.44 mL, 0.22 mmol) dropwise. After being stirred for 30 min at –78 °C, sat. NH4Cl (2 mL) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at r.t. Then 2 M NaOH (5.0 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was extracted with EtOAc (10 mL) for three times. The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc–PE as eluent to obtain cycloadducts. This General Experimental Procedure was carried out using 80.6 mg (0.20 mmol) of 5a, 108 μL (1.00 mmol) of 2,5-dimethylfuran. Column chromatography afforded 50.0 mg (90%) of 6a as a pale yellow solid; mp 126–127 °C; Rf  = 0.30 (PE–EtOAc, 10:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.22 (t, 2 H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.09 (d, 1 H, J = 6.1 Hz), 7.00–6.92 (m, 2 H), 6.83 (d, 1 H, J = 5.3 Hz), 6.77 (t, 2 H, J = 6.7 Hz), 6.66 (d, 2 H, J = 8.0 Hz), 4.45 (d, 1 H, J = 12.3 Hz), 4.20 (d, 1 H, J = 12.3 Hz), 3.92 (br, 1 H), 2.01 (s, 3 H), 1.91 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 154.0, 150.7, 147.9, 147.2, 147.0, 131.2, 129.5, 126.5, 125.5, 118.2, 118.0, 113.0, 90.1, 88.3, 45.8, 17.4, 15.4. ESI-HRMS: m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H20NO: 278.1539; found: 278.1539. See the Supporting Information for experimental details and characterization data for all new compounds.
    • 24a Garr AN, Luo D, Brown N, Cramer CJ, Buszek KR, VanderVelde D. Org. Lett. 2009; 12: 96
    • 24b Ikawa T, Nishiyama T, Nosaki T, Takagi A, Akai S. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1730
    • 24c Kovacs S, Csincsi AI, Nagy TZ, Boros S, Timari G, Novak Z. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 2022

      The regioselectivity of aryne cycloadditions was known to be highly substrate dependent. For cycloaddition with cyclic dienes, see:
    • 25a Reinecke MG. Tetrahedron 1982; 38: 427

    • For cycloaddition with azides, see:
    • 25b Campbell-Verduyn L, Elsinga PH, Mirfeizi L, Dierckx RA, Feringa BL. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008; 6: 3461
    • 25c Shi F, Waldo J, Chen Y, Larock RC. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 2409

    • For cycloaddition with nitrones, see:
    • 25d Matsumoto T, Sohma T, Hatazaki S, Suzuki K. Synlett 1993; 843
    • 25e Dai M, Wang Z, Danishefsky SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 29: 6613