Synlett 2015; 26(16): 2280-2284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1381056
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

TEMPO-Catalyzed Oxidative Amidation of Alcohols via Hexa­fluoroisopropyl Esters

Jean-Michel Vatèle*
Université Lyon 1, Institut de Chimie et Biochimie Moléculaires et Supramoléculaires (ICBMS), UMR 5246 CNRS, Equipe SURCOOF, bât. Raulin, 43, Bd du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France   Email: vatele@univ-lyon1.fr
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 May 2015

Accepted after revision: 02 July 2015

Publication Date:
11 August 2015 (online)


Abstract

Stepwise oxidative amidation of alcohols using trichloroisocyanuric acid, a catalytic amount of TEMPO in combination with pyridine and hexafluoroisopropyl (HFIP) alcohol followed by amines is described. This procedure used HFIP esters as activating esters which were found to be very efficient acylating agents for amide bond formation. This process is compatible with a number of functional groups and acid-sensitive protecting groups.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Humphrey JM, Chamberlin AR. Chem. Rev. 1997; 97: 2343
    • 1b Cupido T, Tulla-Puche J, Spengler J, Albericio F. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2007; 10: 768
    • 1c Wilson RM, Vadola PA, Stockdill JL, Wu X, Li X, Park PK, Wang P, Danishefsky SJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 2834
  • 2 Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ. J. Colomb. Chem. 1999; 1: 55
  • 3 Valeur E, Bradley M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 606 ; and references cited therein
  • 4 For a review on the oxidative amidation of aldehydes, see: Allen CL, Williams JM. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011; 40: 3405
    • 5a Gunanathan C, Ben-David Y, Milstein D. Science 2007; 317: 790
    • 5b Srimani D, Balavaman E, Hu P, Ben-David Y, Milstein D. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013; 355: 2525
  • 6 For a recent review, see: Chen C, Hong SH. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011; 9: 20
    • 7a Yao H, Yamamoto K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 5094
    • 7b Wang G, Yu Q.-Y, Wang J, Wang S, Chen S.-Y, Xu X.-Q. RSC Adv. 2013; 3: 21306
  • 9 For a recent review on tandem oxidation process (TOP), see: Jeena V, Robinson RS. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 40720
  • 10 Tan B, Toda N, Barbas CF. III. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 12538
  • 11 Trzupek LS, Go A, Kopple KD. J. Org. Chem. 1979; 44: 4577
    • 12a Sarkar S, Studer A. Org. Lett. 2010; 112: 1992
    • 12b Ji M, Lim S, Jang H.-Y. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 28225
    • 13a Nakano A, Takahashi K, Ishihara J, Hatakeyama S. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 5357
    • 13b Fang X, Li J, Wang C.-J. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 3448
  • 14 Sarkar SM, Wanzala EN, Shibahara S, Takahashi K, Ishihara J, Hatakeyama S. Chem. Commun. 2009; 5907
  • 15 Merbouch N, Bobbitt JM, Brückner C. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 5116
  • 16 For a study of the mechanism on oxoammonium salt oxidation of alcohols to esters in the presence of pyridine, see: Bobbitt JM, Bartelson AL, Bailey WF, Hamlin TA, Kelly CB. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 1055
  • 17 Szpilman AM, Pisarevsky E, Toledo H, Abramovich A. Synlett 2012; 2261
  • 18 Toledo H, Pisarevsky E, Abramovich A, Szpilman AM. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 4367
  • 19 Kelly CB, Mercadante MA, Wiles RJ, Leadbeater NE. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2222
    • 20a De Luca L, Giacomelli G, Porcheddu A. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 3041
    • 20b De Luca L, Giacomelli G, Masala S, Porcheddu A. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 4999
  • 21 In MeCN, several products were formed at the aldehyde formation stage.
  • 22 Appropriate physical and analytical data were obtained for all new compounds (see Supporting Information).
  • 23 TEMPO-Oxidative Esterification of Alcohols with HFIP Alcohol; General Procedure: To a cooled (0 °C) solution of the alcohol (1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) were added successively TEMPO (7.8 mg, 5 mol%), TCCA (278 mg, 1.2 equiv) in portions and the suspension was stirred until the consumption of the alcohol (progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC). In the case of substrates 2g,jn, NaHCO3 (8 equiv) was added before the addition of TCCA. HFIP alcohol (210 μL, 2 equiv) and pyridine (320 μL, 4 equiv) were then successively added dropwise at 0 °C. After warming, the solution was stirred at r.t. until consumption of the aldehyde (for substrates 1jn, the oxidative esterification was conducted at 0 °C). The yellow suspension was poured onto a small column of silica gel and the HFIP ester was eluted with petroleum ether or a mixture of petroleum ether–Et2O. 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoropropan-2-yl-5-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]pentanoate (2j): Eluent: PE–Et2O (97:3); yield: 79%; liquid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.77 (hept, J = 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.63 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.55 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 1.68–1.93 (m, 2 H), 1.56 (dq, J = 9.9, 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 0.88 (s, 9 H), 0.04 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 170.3, 120.5 (q, J = 282 Hz), 66.3 (sept, J = 35 Hz), 62.3, 33.0, 31.7, 25.8 (3 × C), 21.3, 18.3, –5.5 (2 × C).19F NMR (283 MHz): δ = –73.39 (d, J = 6.1 Hz). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C14H24F6NaO3Si: 405.1291; found: 405.1292.

    • For selected examples of the use of TCCA/TEMPO in the presence of NaHCO3 in organic synthesis, see:
    • 24a Brenner E, Baldwin RM, Tamagan G. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 937
    • 24b Chen X, Xiong F, Zheng C, Li J, Chen F. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 5794
  • 25 Cline GW, Hanna SB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987; 109: 3087
  • 26 Amide Formation from HFIP Esters; General Procedure: To a solution of HFIP ester (1 mmol) in MeCN (2 mL) was added the amine (2 equiv except for allylamine: 3 equiv) and the solution was stirred at r.t. (at reflux for entries 6 and 7 in Table 2 and entry 6 in Table 3) for the reaction time indicated in Tables 2 and 3. The solution was concentrated and the amide was separated from the excess of amine on a pad of silica gel using a mixture of petroleum ether–EtOAc as eluent. 5-[(tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-N-phenethylpentanamide (3j): Eluent: PE–EtOAc (2:1); yield: 97%; oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ = 6.92–7.32 (m, 5 H), 5.58 (br s, 1 H), 3.52 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.41–3.45 (m, 2 H), 2.65 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 1.93 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.64–1.78 (m, 2 H), 1.44–1.57 (m, 2 H), 0.98 (s, 9 H), 0.006 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, C6D6): δ = 172.3, 139.7, 129.1 (2 × C), 128.8 (2 × C), 126.6, 63.1, 41.0, 36.3, 36.2, 32.8, 26.2 (3 × C), 22.6, 18.5, –5.1 (2 × C). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H34NO2Si: 336.2353; found: 336.2344. For other compounds, see Supporting Information.
  • 27 [α]D 20 +81.5 (c 1, CHCl3) for compound 3m {see ref. 28 for the (S)-enantiomer [α]D 20 –80.8 (c 1, CH2Cl2)}.
  • 28 Gryko D, Lipinski R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 3864