Download PDF
neuroreha 2014; 06(02): 90-93
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383840
Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effektivität von Gruppentherapien

Jan Mehrholz
Leiter Wissenschaftliches Institut, Private Europäische Medizinische Akademie der Klinik Bavaria in Kreischa GmbH, An der Wolfsschlucht 1–2, 01731 Kreischa
,
Simone Mückel
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 June 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die beiden Autoren fragten sich, wie effektiv Gruppentherapien in der Rehabilitation von Patienten nach Schlaganfall sind, um die Gehgeschwindigkeit zu verbessern. In einer systematischen Übersichtsarbeit mit sechs Studien kommen die beiden zu dem Ergebnis, dass sich ein Training in Gruppen positiv auf die Gehgeschwindigkeit der Betroffenen auswirkt. Doch können Gruppentherapien wirklich Einzeltherapien ersetzen?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Chu KS, Eng JJ, Dawson AS et al. Water-based exercise for cardiovascular fitness in people with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 6: 870-874
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: A randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 4: 409-417
    Google Scholar
  • 3 English C, Hillier S. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2011; 7: 565-571
    Google Scholar
  • 4 English C, Hillier SL. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 7 CD007513
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Higgins J, Green S. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins J, Altman D, Sterne J, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] The Cochrane Collaboration Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org 2011. S.:
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Hillier S, English C, Crotty M et al. Circuit class or seven-day therapy for increasing intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: protocol of the CIRCIT trial. Int J Stroke 2011; 6: 560-565
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kaur G, English C, Hillier S. Physiotherapists systematically overestimate the amount of time stroke survivors spend engaged in active therapy rehabilitation: an observational study. J Physiother 2013; 1: 45-51
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Mead G, Greig C, Cunningham I et al. Stroke: A randomized trial of exercise or relaxation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 892-899
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Mudge S, Barber PA, Stott NS. Circuit-based rehabilitation improves gait endurance but not usual walking activity in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 12: 1989-1996
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Van de Port IG, Wevers LE, Lindeman E et al. Effects of circuit training as alternative to usual physiotherapy after stroke: Randomised controlled trial. Bmj 2012; e2672
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Veerbeek JM, Koolstra M, Ket JC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy on outcome of gait and gait-related activities in the first 6 months after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke 2011; 11: 3311-3315
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Verma R, Arya KN, Garg RK et al. Task-oriented circuit class training program with motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in poststroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011; 620-632
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Wevers L, Van de Port I, Vermue M et al. Effects of task-oriented circuit class training on walking competency after stroke: A systematic review. Stroke 2009; 7: 2450-2459
    Google Scholar