Kardiologie up2date 2015; 11(02): 71-79
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392521
Herzrythmusstörungen
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Wann kann die orale Antikoagulation abgesetzt werden?

Daniel Steven
,
Arian Sultan
,
Jakob Lüker
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 July 2015 (online)

Abstract

Prevention of stroke is one of the most important therapy goals in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation agents however, may result in bleeding complications. It would be desirable to stop oral anticoagulation (OAC) after successful ablation of atrial fibrillation e. g. after catheter ablation. The data basis for the decision to discontinue OAC is very weak. In patients with prior cerebral infarction, OAC should be continued indefinitely. In patients with a relatively low CHA2DS2VASc score (≤ 2) a discontinuation of OAC may be considered after 1 year after successful catheter ablation and thorough follow-up. Ideally, patients have a continuous monitoring device e.g. reveal or pacemaker implanted to assure complete freedom from recurrent arrhythmias. In patients after electrical cardioversion, OAC should be performed for four weeks even if the CHA2DS2VASc score is zero. In summary, discontinuation of OAC should be very carefully considered. Patients prio to ablation should be advised that ablation therapy does not aim for OAC discontinuation but for control of symptoms.

Kernaussagen
  • Vorhofflimmern ist eine der häufigsten Rhythmusstörungen. Hauptrisiko des Vorhofflimmerns ist ein Schlaganfall, der jedoch auch erst einige Monate nach der letzten Vorhofflimmerepisode auftreten kann.

  • Außer dem Vorhofflimmern sind die Risikomarker des CHA2DS2-VASc-Score bei der Indikationsstellung zur oralen Antikoagulation zu berücksichtigen.

  • Ist das Vorhofflimmern bei Patienten erstmalig nach einer Operation oder im Rahmen einer Hyperthyreose aufgetreten, sollte die OAK nach Beseitigung des kausalen Faktors wieder abgesetzt werden.

  • Ob die OAK bei Patienten nach Kardioversion wieder abgesetzt werden kann, hängt einmal vom CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ab und zum anderen von der Dauer der Vorhofflimmerepisode.

  • Bei Patienten, deren Vorhofflimmern medikamentös behandelt werden kann, kann die OAK in Einzelfällen abgesetzt werden. Die OAK-Indikation sollte hier aber großzügig gestellt werden.

  • Bei abladierten Patienten können weiterhin, meist kürzere Vorhofflimmerepisoden auftreten, die es zu erfassen gilt, weil auch sie mit dem Risiko eines Schlaganfalls einhergehen. Unabhängig von einem solchen Rezidiv gibt es Patienten, die ihre OAK dennoch fortsetzen sollten (hoher CHA2DS2-VASc-Score oder über 75 Jahre alt oder Schlaganfallpatient), und solche, bei denen die OAK nach 3 Monaten abgesetzt werden kann (CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≤ 1).

  • Für Patienten mit Blutungskomplikationen unter OAK ist die Frage nach dem Absetzen einer OAK in der Regel eine Einzelfallentscheidung.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation – developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2012; 14: 1385-1413
  • 2 January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 1-76
  • 3 Daoud EG, Glotzer TV, Wyse DG et al. Temporal relationship of atrial tachyarrhythmias, cerebrovascular events, and systemic emboli based on stored device data: a subgroup analysis of TRENDS. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8: 1416-1423
  • 4 Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369-2429
  • 5 Noseworthy PA, Kapa S, Deshmukh AJ et al. Risk of stroke after catheter ablation versus cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: A propensity-matched study of 24,244 patients. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12: 1154-1161
  • 6 Apenteng PN, Murray ET, Holder R. UK GARFIELD Investigators and GARFIELD Steering Committee et al. An international longitudinal registry of patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke (GARFIELD): the UK protocol. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2013; 13: 31
  • 7 Charitos EI, Stierle U, Ziegler PD et al. A comprehensive evaluation of rhythm monitoring strategies for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from 647 continuously monitored patients and implications for monitoring after therapeutic interventions. Circulation 2012; 126: 806-814
  • 8 Hindricks G, Piorkowski C, Tanner H et al. Perception of atrial fibrillation before and after radiofrequency catheter ablation: relevance of asymptomatic arrhythmia recurrence. Circulation 2005; 112: 307-313
  • 9 Martinek M, Aichinger J, Nesser HJ et al. New insights into long-term follow-up of atrial fibrillation ablation: full disclosure by an implantable pacemaker device. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007; 18: 818-823
  • 10 Sultan A. Symptom reduction in patients after AF ablation: Results from the German Ablation Registry. HRS abstract session. 2015
  • 11 Steinberg BA, Hellkamp AS, Lokhnygina Y et al. Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent vs. paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the ROCKET-AF Trial. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 288-296
  • 12 Oral H, Chugh A, Ozaydin M et al. Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2006; 114: 759-765
  • 13 Bunch TJ, Crandall BG, Weiss JP et al. Warfarin is not needed in low-risk patients following atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009; 20: 988-993
  • 14 Saad EB, d’Avila A, Costa IP et al. Very low risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with a CHADS2 score ≤ 3: a long-term outcome ttudy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011; 4: 615-621
  • 15 Guiot A, Jongnarangsin K, Chugh A et al. Anticoagulant therapy and risk of cerebrovascular events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the elderly. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012; 23: 36-43
  • 16 Karasoy D, Gislason GH, Hansen J et al. Oral anticoagulation therapy after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation and the risk of thromboembolism and serious bleeding: long-term follow-up in nationwide cohort of Denmark. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 307-314
  • 17 Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 806-817
  • 18 Heeger CH, Rillig A, Lin T et al. Feasibility and clinical efficacy of left atrial ablation for the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with left atrial appendage closure devices. Heart Rhythm 2015; DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.011.