Eur J Pediatr Surg 2015; 25(05): 389-396
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1544052
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Perioperative Nutritional Management in Congenital Perineal and Vestibular Fistulas: A Systematic Review

Marrigje Josien Hofmeester
1   Department of Surgery—Pediatric Surgery, Radboudumc-Amalia Children's Hospital, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
,
Jos M. T. H. Draaisma
1   Department of Surgery—Pediatric Surgery, Radboudumc-Amalia Children's Hospital, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
,
Hendt P. Versteegh
2   Department of Surgery—Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC—Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Elizabeth C. P. Huibregtse
1   Department of Surgery—Pediatric Surgery, Radboudumc-Amalia Children's Hospital, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
,
Iris A. L. M. van Rooij
1   Department of Surgery—Pediatric Surgery, Radboudumc-Amalia Children's Hospital, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
,
Ivo de Blaauw
1   Department of Surgery—Pediatric Surgery, Radboudumc-Amalia Children's Hospital, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2   Department of Surgery—Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC—Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 May 2014

20 November 2014

Publication Date:
05 February 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background Surgical advancements have led to improved outcomes for children with congenital anorectal malformations with vestibular and perineal fistulas. However, the effect of perioperative nutritional management is debated and guidelines have not yet been established.

Objective The study aims to give an overview of available published evidence, regarding the impact of different perioperative nutritional management protocols on surgical outcome.

Methods A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. All original articles concerning perioperative nutrition in children with vestibular and perineal fistulas were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the Rangel score. Included studies were subdivided into two groups: early enteral nutrition and prolonged fasting with or without parenteral nutrition.

Results The database search resulted in 768 publications. Nine studies were eligible for inclusion. Wound complications were present in 56 of the 1,557 patients (4%) in whom this was assessed, and were more frequently seen in the prolonged fasting group (2 vs. 10%, p < 0.0001). Regarding the long-term outcome, constipation (grade II–III) was seen in 4% of the early feeding group, compared with 13% in the prolonged fasting group (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion This systematic review presents an overview of studies reporting on perioperative nutritional management in children with perineal and vestibular fistulas. Although study quality is low and study heterogeneity may also influence our results, early enteral feeding seems to be the preferable postoperative feeding strategy. Both early wound complications as well as long-term complications, in terms of clinically relevant constipation, seem to be lower in the early enteral feeding group. However, a prospective randomized, multicentered trial should be initiated to draw definitive conclusions regarding this matter.

 
  • References

  • 1 Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2: 33
  • 2 International Clearinghouse Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Annual Report 2008, with data for 2006.
  • 3 Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP. Associated malformations in patients with anorectal anomalies. Eur J Med Genet 2007; 50 (4) 281-290
  • 4 Endo M, Hayashi A, Ishihara M , et al; Steering Committee of Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies. Analysis of 1,992 patients with anorectal malformations over the past two decades in Japan. J PediatrSurg 1999; 34 (3) 435-441
  • 5 de Blaauw I, Wijers CH, Schmiedeke E , et al. First results of a European multi-center registry of patients with anorectal malformations. J PediatrSurg 2013; 48 (12) 2530-2535
  • 6 deVries PA, Peña A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J PediatrSurg 1982; 17 (5) 638-643
  • 7 Peña A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J PediatrSurg 1982; 17 (6) 796-811
  • 8 Okada A, Kamata S, Imura K , et al. Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for rectovestibular and anovestibular fistula. J PediatrSurg 1992; 27 (1) 85-88
  • 9 Wakhlu A, Kureel SN, Tandon RK, Wakhlu AK. Long-term results of anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for the treatment of vestibular fistula. J PediatrSurg 2009; 44 (10) 1913-1919
  • 10 Upadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gupta DK, Gangopadhyaya AN, Sharma SP, Kumar V. Single stage repair of anovestibular fistula in neonate. PediatrSurgInt 2007; 23 (8) 737-740
  • 11 Adeniran JO. One-stage correction of imperforate anus and rectovestibular fistula in girls: Preliminary results. J PediatrSurg 2002; 37 (6) E16
  • 12 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535
  • 13 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J , et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700
  • 14 Rangel SJ, Kelsey J, Colby CE, Anderson J, Moss RL. Development of a quality assessment scale for retrospective clinical studies in pediatric surgery. J PediatrSurg 2003; 38 (3) 390-396 , discussion 390–396
  • 15 Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A , et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J PediatrSurg 2005; 40 (10) 1521-1526
  • 16 Aziz MA, Banu T, Prasad R, Khan AR. Primary anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for rectovestibular fistula. Asian J Surg 2006; 29 (1) 22-24
  • 17 Kuijper CF, Aronson DC. Anterior or posterior sagittal anorectoplasty without colostomy for low-type anorectal malformation: how to get a better outcome?. J PediatrSurg 2010; 45 (7) 1505-1508
  • 18 Kulshrestha S, Kulshrestha M, Singh B, Sarkar B, Chandra M, Gangopadhyay AN. Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anovestibular fistula. PediatrSurgInt 2007; 23 (12) 1191-1197
  • 19 Kumar B, Kandpal DK, Sharma SB, Agrawal LD, Jhamariya VN. Single-stage repair of vestibular and perineal fistulae without colostomy. J PediatrSurg 2008; 43 (10) 1848-1852
  • 20 Menon P, Rao KL. Primary anorectoplasty in females with common anorectal malformations without colostomy. J PediatrSurg 2007; 42 (6) 1103-1106
  • 21 Akbarshahi H, Andersson B, Nordén M, Andersson R. Perioperative nutrition in elective gastrointestinal surgery—potential for improvement?. Dig Surg 2008; 25 (3) 165-174
  • 22 Fontela PS, Platt RW, Rocher I , et al. Epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infections in Quebec intensive care units: a 6-year review. Am J Infect Control 2012; 40 (3) 221-226
  • 23 Chandonnet CJ, Kahlon PS, Rachh P , et al. Health care failure mode and effect analysis to reduce NICU line-associated bloodstream infections. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (6) e1961-e1969
  • 24 Fisher D, Cochran KM, Provost LP , et al. Reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections in North Carolina NICUs. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (6) e1664-e1671
  • 25 Patrick SW, Davis MM, Sedman AB , et al. Accuracy of hospital administrative data in reporting central line-associated bloodstream infections in newborns. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (Suppl. 01) S75-S80