Download PDF
Int J Angiol 2015; 24(04): 249-261
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546439
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods

Cestmir Recek
1   Retired from Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 March 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Saphenous reflux interferes with the physiological decrease in pressure and induces ambulatory venous hypertension. Elimination of reflux is achieved by flush ligation at the incompetent saphenofemoral junction and stripping of the great saphenous vein, which is the basis of the conventional surgical therapy. Endovenous ablative methods substitute stripping by thermal of chemical destruction of the saphenous trunk; they usually refrain from saphenofemoral junction ligation. Short-term and medium-term results up to 5 years, achieved after endovenous ablation without high ligation, are comparable with those after conventional surgery, which questioned the necessity to ligate the incompetent saphenofemoral junction. Nevertheless, clinical symptoms caused by recurrent reflux occur as a rule not earlier than 8 to 10 years after efficient abolition of reflux. Consequently, randomized studies with long-term follow-ups exceeding 10 years are necessary for trustworthy assessment whether it is justified to abstain from saphenofemoral junction ligation.

Keywords

endovascular procedure - endovenous ablation - greater saphenous vein - lower extremity - radiofrequency ablation - varicose veins - vein reflux
 

  • References

  • 1 Höjensgard IC, Stürup H. Static and dynamic pressures in superficial and deep veins of the lower extremity in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1952; 27 (1) 49-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arnoldi CC. Venous pressure in the legs of healthy human subjects at rest and during muscular exercise in nearly erect position. Acta Chir Scand 1965; 130: 530-583
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Recek C, Pojer H. Ambulatory pressure gradient in the veins of the lower extremity. Vasa 2000; 29 (3) 187-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Recek C. Calf pump activity influencing venous hemodynamics in the lower extremity. Int J Angiol 2013; 22 (1) 23-30
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Recek C. The hemodynamic paradox as a phenomenon triggering recurrent reflux in varicose vein disease. Int J Angiol 2012; 21 (3) 181-186
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pipp F, Boehm S, Cai WJ , et al. Elevated fluid shear stress enhances postocclusive collateral artery growth and gene expression in the pig hind limb. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24 (9) 1664-1668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schaper W, Scholz D. Factors regulating arteriogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23 (7) 1143-1151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Resnick N, Gimbrone Jr MA. Hemodynamic forces are complex regulators of endothelial gene expression. FASEB J 1995; 9 (10) 874-882
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schierling W, Troidl K, Troidl C, Schmitz-Rixen T, Schaper W, Eitenmüller IK. The role of angiogenic growth factors in arteriogenesis. J Vasc Res 2009; 46 (4) 365-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 El Wajeh Y, Giannoukas AD, Gulliford CJ, Suvarna SK, Chan P. Saphenofemoral venous channels associated with recurrent varicose veins are not neovascular. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28 (6) 590-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Trendelenburg F. Ligation of the great saphenous vein in varicose veins of the lower leg (German). Beitr Klin Chir 1891; 7: 195-210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Perthes G. The operation of varicose veins of the lower leg according to Trendelenburg (German). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1895; 21: 253-257
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Recek C. The impact of crossectomy on the venous hemodynamics in primary varicose veins (German). Phlebologie 1996; 25: 11-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Recek C. Saphenous reflux as the cause of severe hemodynamic disturbance in primary varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency (German). Acta Chir Austriaca 1998; 30: 76-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Recek C. Medium-term results after crossectomy combined with sclerotherapy (German). Phlebologie 2000; 29: 23-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ludbrook J, Beale G. Femoral venous valves in relation to varicose veins. Lancet 1962; 1 (7220) 79-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Perrin MR, Guex JJ, Ruckley CV , et al. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. REVAS group. Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 8 (4) 233-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fischer R, Linde N, Duff C, Jeanneret C, Chandler JG, Seeber P. Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34 (2) 236-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kostas T, Ioannou CV, Touloupakis E , et al. Recurrent varicose veins after surgery: a new appraisal of a common and complex problem in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27 (3) 275-282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Winterborn RJ, Foy C, Earnshaw JJ. Causes of varicose vein recurrence: late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (4) 634-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hartmann K, Klode J, Pfister R , et al. Recurrent varicose veins: sonography-based re-examination of 210 patients 14 years after ligation and saphenous vein stripping. Vasa 2006; 35 (1) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Allegra C, Antignani PL, Carlizza A. Recurrent varicose veins following surgical treatment: our experience with five years follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33 (6) 751-756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Geier B, Stücker M, Hummel T , et al. Residual stumps associated with inguinal varicose vein recurrences: a multicenter study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36 (2) 207-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nelzén O, Fransson I. Varicose vein recurrence and patient satisfaction 10-14 years following combined superficial and perforator vein surgery: a prospective case study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46 (3) 372-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bradbury AW, Stonebridge PA, Callam MJ , et al. Recurrent varicose veins: assessment of the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg 1994; 81 (3) 373-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tong Y, Royle J. Recurrent varicose veins following high ligation of long saphenous vein: a duplex ultrasound study. Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 3 (5) 485-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Viani MP, Poggi RV, Pinto A, Andreani SM, Spagnoli C, Maruotti RA. Re-exploration of the saphenofemoral junction in the treatment of recurrent varicose veins. Int Surg 1996; 81 (4) 382-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jiang P, van Rij AM, Christie R, Hill G, Solomon C, Thomson I. Recurrent varicose veins: patterns of reflux and clinical severity. Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 7 (3) 332-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Egan B, Donnelly M, Bresnihan M, Tierney S, Feeley M. Neovascularization: an “innocent bystander” in recurrent varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44 (6) 1279-1284 , discussion 1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bartos Jr J, Bartos J. Causes of recurrencies following procedures for varicose veins of the lower extremities[in Czech]. Rozhl Chir 2006; 85 (6) 293-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gabriel M, Zieliński P, Pawlaczyk K, Krasiński Z, Stanisić M, Dzieciuchowicz Ł. The analyze of recurrent varicose veins development after surgical treatment of lower limbs varicose veins [in Polish]. Przegl Lek 2011; 68 (3) 161-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Stonebridge PA, Chalmers N, Beggs I, Bradbury AW, Ruckley CV. Recurrent varicose veins: a varicographic analysis leading to a new practical classification. Br J Surg 1995; 82 (1) 60-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Winterborn RJ, Earnshaw JJ. Crossectomy and great saphenous vein stripping. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2006; 47 (1) 19-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sarin S, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Assessment of stripping the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg 1992; 79 (9) 889-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sarin S, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Stripping of the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg 1994; 81 (10) 1455-1458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dwerryhouse S, Davies B, Harradine K, Earnshaw JJ. Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29 (4) 589-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D, Cooke S, Earnshaw JJ. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12 (4) 442-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Glass GM. Neovascularization in recurrence of the varicose great saphenous vein following transection. Phlebology 1987; 2: 81-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Turton EP, Scott DJ, Richards SP , et al. Duplex-derived evidence of reflux after varicose vein surgery: neoreflux or neovascularisation?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 17 (3) 230-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 van Rij AM, Jones GT, Hill GB, Jiang P. Neovascularization and recurrent varicose veins: more histologic and ultrasound evidence. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (2) 296-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Nyamekye I, Shephard NA, Davies B, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. Clinicopathological evidence that neovascularisation is a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15 (5) 412-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Munn SR, Morton JB, Macbeth WA, Mcleish AR. To strip or not to strip the long saphenous vein? A varicose veins trial. Br J Surg 1981; 68 (6) 426-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rutgers PH, Kitslaar PJ. Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg 1994; 168 (4) 311-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Raivio P, Perhoniemi V, Lehtola A. Long-term results of vein sparing varicose vein surgery. World J Surg 2002; 26 (12) 1507-1511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Casoni P, Lefebvre-Vilardebo M, Villa F, Corona P. Great saphenous vein surgery without high ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (1) 173-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Brake M, Lim CS, Shepherd AC, Shalhoub J, Davies AH. Pathogenesis and etiology of recurrent varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57 (3) 860-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Blomgren L, Johansson G, Dahlberg-AKerman A , et al. Recurrent varicose veins: incidence, risk factors and groin anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27 (3) 269-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Mouton WG, Marklewitz MM, Friedli S , et al. Neovascularisation after surgery for recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence: does surgical dissection technique matter?. Vasa 2011; 40 (4) 296-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Merchant RF, Pichot O ; Closure Study Group. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42 (3) 502-509 , discussion 509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Mozes G, Kalra M, Carmo M, Swenson L, Gloviczki P. Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41 (1) 130-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Wright D, Morrison N, Recek C, Passariello F. Post ablation superficial thrombus extension (PASTE) into the commons femoral vein as a consequence of endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein. Acta Phlebol 2010; 11: 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hingorani AP, Ascher E, Markevich N , et al. Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (3) 500-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Theivacumar NS, Dellagrammaticas D, Darwood RJ, Mavor AI, Gough MJ. Fate of the great saphenous vein following endovenous laser ablation: does re-canalisation mean recurrence?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36 (2) 211-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Kaspar S, Pirkl M, Príborská J, Kaspar D. A six-year experience with endovenous laser in the treatment of lower extremity varices [in Czech]. Rozhl Chir 2009; 88 (3) 106-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Pannier F, Rabe E. Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of saphenous varicose veins. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2006; 47 (1) 3-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Myers KA, Jolley D. Outcome of endovenous laser therapy for saphenous reflux and varicose veins: medium-term results assessed by ultrasound surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37 (2) 239-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Health Quality Ontario. Endovascular laser therapy for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2010; 10 (6) 1-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Theivacumar NS, Dellagrammaticas D, Beale RJ, Mavor AI, Gough MJ. Fate and clinical significance of saphenofemoral junction tributaries following endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein. Br J Surg 2007; 94 (6) 722-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Corcos L, Dini S, Peruzzi G, Pontello D, Dini M, De Anna D. Duplex ultrasound changes in the great saphenous vein after endosaphenous laser occlusion with 808-nm wavelength. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48 (5) 1262-1271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Kalteis M, Berger I, Messie-Werndl S , et al. High ligation combined with stripping and endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: early results of a randomized controlled study. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47 (4) 822-829 , discussion 829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M, Blemings A, Lawaetz B, Eklof B. Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (2) 308-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Rasmussen L, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, Blemings A, Eklof B. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (2) 421-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Rass K, Frings N, Glowacki P , et al. Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study). Arch Dermatol 2012; 148 (1) 49-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Lin Y, Ye CS, Huang XL, Ye JL, Yin HH, Wang SM. A random, comparative study on endovenous laser therapy and saphenous veins stripping for the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007; 87 (43) 3043-3046
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Christenson JT, Gueddi S, Gemayel G, Bounameaux H. Prospective randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and surgery for treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins with a 2-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (5) 1234-1241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Theivacumar NS, Darwood R, Gough MJ. Neovascularisation and recurrence 2 years after varicose vein treatment for sapheno-femoral and great saphenous vein reflux: a comparison of surgery and endovenous laser ablation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 38 (2) 203-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC, Moll FL. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great Saphenous vein with and without ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction: 2-year results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36 (6) 713-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC, Moll FL. Five-year results of a randomised clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with and without ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41 (5) 685-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Longhini A, Borelli P, Franzini M, Kazemian AR, Munarini G, Marcolli G. Combination of endovenous laser treatment and a surgical approach for venous disease [in Italian]. Chir Ital 2007; 59 (4) 475-479
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Flessenkämper I, Hartmann M, Stenger D, Roll S. Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Phlebology 2013; 28 (1) 16-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Nicolini P ; Closure Group. Treatment of primary varicose veins by endovenous obliteration with the VNUS closure system: results of a prospective multicentre study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29 (4) 433-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B , et al. Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29 (1) 67-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B , et al. Reprinted article “Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up”. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42 (Suppl. 01) S107-S113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Pichot O, Kabnick LS, Creton D, Merchant RF, Schuller-Petroviae S, Chandler JG. Duplex ultrasound scan findings two years after great saphenous vein radiofrequency endovenous obliteration. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39 (1) 189-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Health Quality Ontario. Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2011; 11 (1) 1-93
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Chandler JG, Pichot O, Sessa C, Schuller-Petrović S, Osse FJ, Bergan JJ. Defining the role of extended saphenofemoral junction ligation: a prospective comparative study. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32 (5) 941-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Bergan J, Pascarella L, Mekenas L. Venous disorders: treatment with sclerosant foam. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2006; 47 (1) 9-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Badri H, Bhattacharya V. A review of current treatment strategies for varicose veins. Recent Patents Cardiovasc Drug Discov 2008; 3 (2) 126-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Shadid N, Ceulen R, Nelemans P , et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy versus surgery for the incompetent great saphenous vein. Br J Surg 2012; 99 (8) 1062-1070
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Chapman-Smith P, Browne A. Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux. Phlebology 2009; 24 (4) 183-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Lattimer CR, Kalodiki E, Azzam M, Makris GC, Somiayajulu S, Geroulakos G. Interim results on abolishing reflux alongside a randomized clinical trial on laser ablation with phlebectomies versus foam sclerotherapy. Int Angiol 2013; 32 (4) 394-403
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Luebke T, Brunkwall J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration, endovenous laser therapy, and foam sclerotherapy for primary varicosis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2008; 49 (2) 213-233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Biemans AA, Kockaert M, Akkersdijk GP , et al. Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (3) 727-34.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar