Ethical Issues in Decision-Making for Infants with Disorders of Sex Development

Abstract

Medical decisions for infants and children should generally be based on the best interests of the child. When there is legitimate controversy over the child’s best interests, the right of the child to an open future should generally determine the course of treatment. In the case of infants born with disorders of sex development (DSD), early cosmetic genitoplasty was long believed to be in the child’s best interest and was therefore the standard of care. New data suggest that early genitoplasty may be more harmful than helpful, therefore the best interest standard is no longer determinative in such cases. Because children born with DSD have a right to an open future, and because the openness of their future is clearly enhanced by delaying cosmetic genitoplasty until they themselves can participate meaningfully in decision-making, early genitoplasty is ethically supportable only when medically indicated (e. g., when the child is unable to urinate without surgical intervention). Further research is needed to clarify the benefits and burdens of early and delayed genitoplasty. In parallel with further research, efforts should focus on educating society broadly to decrease stigmatization of persons with DSD.

Key words

ethics - decision-making - children

• References

• 1 Kopelman LM. The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. J Med Philos 1997; 22: 271-289
• 2 American Medical Association Opinion 10.016 – Pediatric Decision-Making. Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion10016.page?
• 3 Kopelman LM. Using the Best Interests Standard to Generate Actual Duties. AJOB Prim Res 2013; 4: 11-14
• 4 Glassberg KI. The intersex infant: early gender assignment and surgical reconstruction. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 1998; 11: 151-154
• 5 Grumbach MM, Conte FA, Hughes IA. Disorders of sex differentiation. In: Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS. (eds.) Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 10^th ed Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002
• 6 Money J, Hampson JG, Hampson JL. Hermaphroditism: recommendations concerning assignment of sex, change of sex and psychologic management. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1955; 97: 284-300
• 7 American Psychologial Assocation. Definition of Terms: Sex, Gender, Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation. 2011 Available at http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-definitions.pdf
• 8 National Child Traumatic Stress Network. LGBTQ Youth and Sexual Abuse: Information for Mental Health Professionals. 2014 Available at http://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/lgbtq_tipsheet_for_professionals.pdf
• 9 World Professional Association for Transgender Health. WPATH De-Psychopatholisation Statement. May 26 2010 Available at http://www.wpath.org/publications_public_policy.cfm
• 10 Consortium on the Management of Disorders of Sex Development. Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Disorders of Sex Development in Childhood Whitehouse Station, NJ: Acord Alliance 2006 Available at http://www.accordalliance.org/dsd-guidelines/
• 11 Crouch NS, Creighton SM. Minimal surgical intervention in the management of intersex conditions. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2004; 17: 1591-1596
• 12 Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF, Hughes IA. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. International Consensus Conference on Intersex. Pediatrics 2006; 118: e488-e500
• 13 Feinberg J. The child’s right to an open future. In: Aiken W, La Fallette H. eds Whose child? Children’s rights, parental authority and state power. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield; 1980
• 14 Feinberg J. The child’s right to an open future. In, Freedom and fulfillment: philosophical essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1992
• 15 Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics . Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314-317
• 16 American Medical Association Policy D-373.999 Informed Patient Choice and Shared Decision Making. Available at https://ssl3.ama-assn.org/apps/ecomm/PolicyFinderForm.pl?site=www.ama-assn.org&uri=/ama1/pub/upload/mm/PolicyFinder/policyfiles/DIR/D-373.999.HTM
• 17 Mercurio MR, Adam MB, Forman EN, Ladd RE, Ross LF, Silber TJ. American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 1. Pediatr Rev 2008; 29: e1-e8
• 18 Kon AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304: 903-904
• 19 Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?. BMJ 1999; 319: 780-782
• 20 Karkazis K, Tamar-Mattis A, Kon AA. Genital surgery for disorders of sex development: implementing a shared decision-making approach. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2010; 23: 789-805
• 21 National Disability Rights Network Available at www.ndrn.org
• 22 National Center for Lesbian Rights #BornPerfect: Laws & Legislation by State. Available at http://www.nclrights.org/bornperfect-laws-legislation-by-state/
• 23 American Psychiatric Association Gender Dysphoria, 2013 Available at http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Gender%20Dysphoria%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf
• 24 American Medical Association Resolution 122 (A-08), 2008 Available at http://www.tgender.net/taw/ama_resolutions.pdf
• 25 Nandi J. Germany got it right by offering a third gender option on birth certificates. In: The Guardian. New York, NY: 2013