Download PDF
Horm Metab Res 2015; 47(05): 387-393
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548936
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Disorders of Sex Development (DSD): Networking and Standardization Considerations

D. E. Sandberg
1   Department of Pediatrics & Communicable Diseases and the Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA
,
N. Callens
1   Department of Pediatrics & Communicable Diseases and the Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA
,
A. B. Wisniewski
2   Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 23 November 2014

accepted 26 March 2015

Publication Date:
13 May 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Syndromes resulting in Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) are individually rare. Historically, this fact has hindered both clinical research and the delivery of evidence-based care. Recognizing the need for advancement, members of European and North American medical societies produced policy statements, notably the Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders, which recognize that optimal healthcare in DSD requires multidisciplinary teams in conjunction with networking of treatment centers and continued development of patient registries. This paper summarizes efforts in Europe and the U.S. toward creating networks focused on expanding discovery and improving healthcare and quality of life outcomes in DSD. The objectives and function of registry-based networks (EuroDSD/I-DSD), learning collaboratives (DSD-net), clinical outcomes research (DSD-Life), and networking hybrids (DSD-TRN) are reviewed. Opportunities for, and barriers to standardization in research and care are highlighted in light of practical considerations, for example, limitations in reliably classifying anatomic phenotypes and gaps in behavioral health staffing resources. The role of patient-reported outcomes is considered, with emphasis on integrating patient perspectives, given findings of limited agreement in outcome ratings by healthcare providers and patients. Finally, the characteristics of clinical centers likely to deliver the highest quality outcomes are discussed.

Key words

networking - standardization - quality improvement - patient-reported outcomes
 

  • References

  • 1 Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF, Hughes IA. Participants in the International Consensus Conference on Intersex. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics 2006; 118: e488-e500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Moran ME, Karkazis K. Developing a multidisciplinary team for disorders of sex development: Planning, implementation, and operation tools for care providers. Adv Urol 2012; 2012: 604135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Institute of Medicine . Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Hanauer DA, Gardner M, Sandberg DE. Unbiased identification of patients with disorders of sex development. PLoS One 2014; 9: e108702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kolesinska Z, Ahmed SF, Niedziela M, Bryce J, Molinska-Glura M, Rodie M, Jiang J, Sinnott RO, Hughes IA, Darendeliler F, Hiort O, van der Zwan Y, Cools M, Guran T, Holterhus PM, Bertelloni S, Lisa L, Arlt W, Krone N, Ellaithi M, Balsamo A, Mazen I, Nordenstrom A, Lachlan K, Alkhawari M, Chatelain P, Weintrob N. Changes over time in sex assignment for disorders of sex development. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e710-e715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cox K, Bryce J, Jiang J, Rodie M, Sinnott R, Alkhawari M, Arlt W, Audi L, Balsamo A, Bertelloni S, Cools M, Darendeliler F, Drop S, Ellaithi M, Guran T, Hiort O, Holterhus PM, Hughes I, Krone N, Lisa L, Morel Y, Soder O, Wieacker P, Ahmed SF. Novel associations in disorders of sex development: Findings from the I-DSD registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99: E348-E355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sandberg DE, Gardner M, Cohen-Kettenis PT. Psychological aspects of the treatment of patients with disorders of sex development. Semin Reprod Med 2012; 30: 443-452
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Arboleda VA, Lee H, Sanchez FJ, Delot EC, Sandberg DE, Grody WW, Nelson SF, Vilain E. Targeted massively parallel sequencing provides comprehensive genetic diagnosis for patients with disorders of sex development. Clin Genet 2013; 83: 35-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Arboleda VA, Sandberg DE, Vilain E. DSDs: Genetics, underlying pathologies and psychosexual differentiation. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2014; 10: 603-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Baxter RM, Arboleda VA, Lee H, Barseghyan H, Adam MP, Fechner PY, Bargman R, Keegan C, Travers S, Schelley S, Hudgins L, Mathew RP, Stalker HJ, Zori R, Gordon OK, Ramos-Platt L, Pawlikowska-Haddal A, Eskin A, Nelson SF, Delot E, Vilain E. Exome sequencing for the diagnosis of 46,XY disorders of sex development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100: E333-E344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Research progress report – strategic plan for pediatric urology. NIH Publication No. 06-5879 2006 February
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Meyer-Bahlburg HFL. Treatment guidelines for children with disorders of sex development. Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence 2008; 56: 345-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 U.S. Department of Health Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation Research, U.S. Department of Health Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health . Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. Cpmp/ewp/139391/04 2006 January
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wisniewski AB, Migeon CJ, Malouf MA, Gearhart JP. Psychosexual outcome in women affected by congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J Urol 2004; 171: 2497-2501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Migeon CJ, Wisniewski AB, Gearhart JP, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Rock JA, Brown TR, Casella SJ, Maret A, Ngai KM, Money J, Berkovitz GD. Ambiguous genitalia with perineoscrotal hypospadias in 46,XY individuals: Long-term medical, surgical, and psychosexual outcome. Pediatrics 2002; 110: e31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lattig F, Grob D, Kleinstueck FS, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, O’Riordan D, Mannion AF. Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: How often do the surgeon and patient agree?. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 386-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Roitberg BZ, Thaci B, Auffinger B, Kaplan L, Shen J, Brown FD, Lam S. Comparison between patient and surgeon perception of degenerative spine disease outcomes – a prospective blinded database study. Acta Neurochir 2013; 155: 757-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kerrigan CL, Homa K. Visual assessment of linear scars: A new tool. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1513-1519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 O’Toole RV, Castillo RC, Pollak AN, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ. LEAP Study Group . Surgeons and their patients disagree regarding cosmetic and overall outcomes after surgery for high-energy lower extremity trauma. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23: 716-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Buchanan R, Birch JG, Morton AA, Browne RH. Do you see what I see? Looking at scoliosis surgical outcomes through orthopedists’ eyes. Spine 2003; 28: 2700-2704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Springer A, Krois W, Horcher E. Trends in hypospadias surgery: Results of a worldwide survey. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 1184-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Steven L, Cherian A, Yankovic F, Mathur A, Kulkarni M, Cuckow P. Current practice in paediatric hypospadias surgery; a specialist survey. J Pediatr Urol 2013; 9: 1126-1130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases. EUCERD recommendations: Quality criteria for centres of expertise for rare diseases. 2011 October 24. Available http://nestor.orpha.net/EUCERD/upload/file/EUCERDRecommendationCE.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Institute of Medicine . Establishing transdisciplinary professionalism for improving health outcomes: Workshop summary. In: Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Pless I. Editorial: ‘Interdisciplinary’ and ‘multidisciplinary’ are not synonymous. Injury Prevent 1995; 1: 65-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Health Canada. Interdisciplinary education for collaborative, patient-centred practice. Research and findings report. 2004 February 20. Available http://www.ferasi.umontreal.ca/eng/07_info/IECPCP_Final_Report.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Colletti RB, Kappelman MD, Crandall WV, Margolis PA. Quality improvement in inflammatory bowel disease. In: Mamula P, Markowitz JE, Baldassano RN. eds Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013: 547-554
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Godfrey MM, Oliver BJ. Accelerating the rate of improvement in cystic fibrosis care: Contributions and insights of the learning and leadership collaborative. BMJ Qual Safety 2014; 23: i23-i32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Weiss KB, Mendoza G, Schall MW, Berwick DM, Roessner J. Improving asthma care in children and adults. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Ahmed SF, Rodie M, Jiang J, Sinnott RO. The European disorder of sex development registry: A virtual research environment. Sexual Develop 2010; 4: 192-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bashamboo A, Ledig S, Wieacker P, Achermann JC, McElreavey K. New technologies for the identification of novel genetic markers of disorders of sex development (DSD). Sexual Develop 2010; 4: 213-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Köhler B, Jürgensen M, Kleinemeier E, Thyen U. Psychosexual development in individuals with disorders of sex development. In: Kreukels BPC, Steensma TD, de Vries ALC. eds Gender dysphoria and disorders of sex development. Springer; US: 2014: 115-134
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Akhavan A, Merguerian PA, Grady RW, DiSandro M, Shnorhavorian M. Digital photographic measurement in hypospadias: Validation and comparison to intraoperative measurement. J Pediatr Urol 2014; 10: 312-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sandberg DE, Mazur T. A noncategorical approach to the psychosocial care of persons with DSD and their families. In: Kreukels BPC, Steensma TD, de Vries ALC. eds Gender dysphoria and disorders of sex development. Springer; US: 2014: 93-114
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar