Z Gastroenterol 2015; 53(08): 782-788
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553476
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Klinisch relevante, geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede beim kolorektalen Karzinom (KRK)

Clinically relevant, gender-specific differences in colorectal carcinoma (CRC)
N. Höffken
,
J. Leichsenring
,
A. Reinacher-Schick
Further Information

Publication History

05 April 2015

06 July 2015

Publication Date:
18 August 2015 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Weltweit treten kolorektale Karzinome bei Männern aller Altersgruppen häufiger auf als bei Frauen. Die typischen Risikofaktoren wie Rauchen, Übergewicht, ballaststoffarme Kost und fleischreiche Ernährung können den geschlechtsspezifischen Unterschied nicht allein erklären. Eine wichtige Rolle in der Pathogenese der Erkrankung scheinen die Östrogene zu spielen. Dies erklärt, warum prämenopausale Frauen ein niedriges Risiko haben zu erkranken. Im gesunden Kolon werden Östrogenrezeptoren ERß exprimiert. Bei der Entwicklung eines Kolonkarzinoms nehmen diese signifikant ab. Den Östrogenen wird ein protektiver Effekt zugeschrieben. Möglicherweise fungieren sie als Tumorsuppressor oder über einen Einfluss auf die Signalwege der Karzinogenese. Die genaue Rolle der Östrogene bei der Karzinogenese des Kolonkarzinoms ist jedoch weiterhin unklar.

Auch die Lokalisation der Kolonkarzinome ist in Abhängigkeit vom Geschlecht und Alter unterschiedlich. Frauen nach der Menopause weisen einen Shift der Tumorlokalisation in das rechte Kolon auf. Hier wird ein Zusammenhang mit einem erhöhten MSI-H-Status vermutet.

Zu den geschlechtsspezifischen Unterschieden der adjuvanten und palliativen Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms gibt es praktisch keine prospektiv randomisierten Studien. Ältere Registerarbeiten weisen darauf hin, dass Frauen postoperativ eine bessere Prognose aufweisen, Männer jedoch von einer adjuvanten Therapie mehr profitieren. Möglicherweise spielt hier eine gesteigerte 5-FU-Toxizität bei Frauen eine Rolle. In der palliativen Therapie gibt es nur wenige geschlechtsspezifische Analysen. Vor allem Frauen mit rechtsseitigen Kolonkarzinomen scheinen unter einer Anti-EGFR-Therapie ein deutlich schlechteres Ansprechen aufzuweisen als Männer mit linksseitigen Karzinomen. Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede sollten zukünftig häufiger in randomisierte Studien mit einbezogen werden.

Abstract

The incidence of colorectal cancer worldwide is higher in men. Risk factors like smoking, overweight, or dietary exposures cannot explain this gender difference. In the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma, estrogen seems to play an important protective role. Estrogen may reduce the risk of developing colon cancer in premenopausal women.

The expression of estrogen receptor ß in healthy colon is significantly decreased in the development of colon cancer. The role of estrogen in pathogenic pathways is most likely protective or might serve as a tumor suppressor. However, the exact role of estrogen in the carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer still remains unclear.

Furthermore, tumor localization depends on age and gender. Therefore, in postmenopausal women there is a shift to predominantly right-sided cancers. Here, a link between tumor localization and MSI-H (microsatellite-high) status can be assumed.

There are virtually no prospective randomised trials in adjuvant or palliative therapy of patients with colorectal cancer. Earlier data from registries point to a better post-operative survival of women, while men seem to benefit more from adjuvant therapy. Potentially, there may be a role of an increased toxicity to 5-FU in women. In the palliative setting, there are also only few gender-specific analyses. Women with right-sided colon cancers show a significant worse response and survival under an anti-EGFR antibody treatment compared with men and left-sided cancers. A focus on gender-specific differences should be incorporated more often in future randomised trials.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Angulo P, Lindor K. Primary billiary cirrhosis. In: Feldman M, Friedmann L, Brandt L, eds Sleisenger & Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: 1885-1898
  • 2 Browning J, Sreenarasimhaiah J. Gallstone disease. In: Feldman M, Friedmann L, Brandt L, eds Sleisenger & Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier; 2006: 1387-1418
  • 3 Richter J. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complication. In: Feldman M, Friedmann L, Brandt L, eds Sleisenger & Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier; 2006: 906-936
  • 4 Tung B, Kowdley K. Sclerosing cholangitis and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. In: Feldman M, Friedmann L, Brandt L, eds Sleisenger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier; 2006: 1461-1476
  • 5 Siegel R, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer facts and figures 2011–2013. In: Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures. 32. Atlanta: 2011
  • 6 Wang L, Wilson SE, Stewart DB et al. Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage?. Cancer epidemiology 2011; 35: 417-422
  • 7 Calle EE, Miracle-McMahill HL, Thun MJ et al. Estrogen replacement therapy and risk of fatal colon cancer in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1995; 87: 517-523
  • 8 Chan JA, Meyerhardt JA, Chan AT et al. Hormone replacement therapy and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006; 24: 5680-5686
  • 9 Mandelson MT, Miglioretti D, Newcomb PA et al. Hormone replacement therapy in relation to survival in women diagnosed with colon cancer. Cancer causes & control: CCC 2003; 14: 979-984
  • 10 Slattery ML, Anderson K, Samowitz W et al. Hormone replacement therapy and improved survival among postmenopausal women diagnosed with colon cancer (USA). Cancer causes & control: CCC 1999; 10: 467-473
  • 11 Newcomb PA, Chia VM, Hampton JM et al. Hormone therapy in relation to survival from large bowel cancer. Cancer Causes & Control 2008; 20: 409-416
  • 12 Barzi A, Lenz AM, Labonte MJ et al. Molecular Pathways: Estrogen Pathway in Colorectal Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 2013; 19: 5842-5848
  • 13 Hartz A, He T, Ross JJ. Risk factors for colon cancer in 150912 postmenopausal women. Cancer causes & control: CCC 2012; 23: 1599-1605
  • 14 Fernandez E, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C et al. Sex differences in colorectal cancer mortality in Europe, 1955–1996. European journal of cancer prevention: the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) 2000; 9: 99-104
  • 15 Hendifar A, Yang D, Lenz F et al. Gender disparities in metastatic colorectal cancer survival. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2009; 15: 6391-6397
  • 16 Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321-333
  • 17 Kim EJ, Shin HK, Park JHY. Genistein inhibits insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling in HT-29 human colon cancer cells: a possible mechanism of the growth inhibitory effect of Genistein. Journal of medicinal food 2005; 8: 431-438
  • 18 Qi W, Weber CR, Wasland K et al. Genistein inhibits proliferation of colon cancer cells by attenuating a negative effect of epidermal growth factor on tumor suppressor FOXO3 activity. BMC cancer 2011; 11: 219
  • 19 Yan L, Spitznagel EL, Bosland MC. Soy consumption and colorectal cancer risk in humans: a meta-analysis. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2010; 19: 148-158
  • 20 Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The lancet oncology 2014; 15: 1065-1075
  • 21 Iida Y, Kawai K, Tsuno NH et al. Proximal Shift of Colorectal Cancer Along With Aging. Clinical Colorectal Cancer 2014; 13: 213-218
  • 22 Papaxoinis K, Triantafyllou K, Sasco AJ et al. Subsite-specific differences of estrogen receptor beta expression in the normal colonic epithelium: implications for carcinogenesis and colorectal cancer epidemiology. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 2010; 22: 614-619
  • 23 Debruyne PR, Bruyneel EA, Li X et al. The role of bile acids in carcinogenesis. Mutation research 2001; 480–481: 359-369
  • 24 Malkhosyan SR, Yamamoto H, Piao Z et al. Late onset and high incidence of colon cancer of the mutator phenotype with hypermethylated hMLH1 gene in women. Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 598
  • 25 Ribic C, Sargent D, Moore M et al. Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. The New England journal of medicine 2003; 349: 247-257
  • 26 Roth AD, Delorenzi M, Tejpar S et al. Integrated analysis of molecular and clinical prognostic factors in stage II/III colon cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2012; 104: 1635-1646
  • 27 Sargent DJ, Marsoni S, Thibodeau SN et al. Confirmation of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) as a predictive marker for lack of benefit from 5-FU based chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer (CC): A pooled molecular reanalysis of randomized chemotherapy trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008; 26: 4008
  • 28 Benedix F, Kube R, Meyer F et al. Comparison of 17641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Diseases of the colon and rectum 2010; 53: 57-64
  • 29 Arai T, Takubo K. Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of gastric and colorectal carcinomas in the elderly. Pathology international 2007; 57: 303-314
  • 30 Meguid RA, Slidell MB, Wolfgang CL et al. Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers?. Annals of surgical oncology 2008; 15: 2388-2394
  • 31 Okamoto M, Shiratori Y, Yamaji Y et al. Relationship between age and site of colorectal cancer based on colonoscopy findings. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2002; 55: 548-551
  • 32 Xie L, Villeneuve PJ, Shaw A. Survival of patients diagnosed with either colorectal mucinous or non-mucinous adenocarcinoma: a population-based study in Canada. International journal of oncology 2009; 34: 1109-1115
  • 33 Meyers M, Wagner MW, Hwang HS et al. Role of the hMLH1 DNA mismatch repair protein in fluoropyrimidine-mediated cell death and cell cycle responses. Cancer research 2001; 61: 5193-5201
  • 34 Sugai T, Habano W, Jiao YF et al. Analysis of Molecular Alterations in Left- and Right-Sided Colorectal Carcinomas Reveals Distinct Pathways of Carcinogenesis. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2006; 8: 193-201
  • 35 Jass JR. Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology 2007; 50: 113-130
  • 36 Hoffmeister M, Blaker H, Kloor M et al. Body Mass Index and Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2013; 22: 2303-2311
  • 37 Kuchiba A, Morikawa T, Yamauchi M et al. Body mass index and risk of colorectal cancer according to fatty acid synthase expression in the nurses' health study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2012; 104: 415-420
  • 38 Menendez JA, Lupu R. Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis. Nature reviews Cancer 2007; 7: 763-777
  • 39 Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Ogawa A et al. Fatty acid synthase overexpression in colorectal cancer is associated with microsatellite instability, independent of CpG island methylator phenotype. Human pathology 2007; 38: 842-849
  • 40 Rakoff-Nahoum S, Medzhitov R. Regulation of spontaneous intestinal tumorigenesis through the adaptor protein MyD88. Science (New York, NY) 2007; 317: 124-127
  • 41 Konstantinopoulos PA, Kominea A, Vandoros G et al. Oestrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) is abundantly expressed in normal colonic mucosa, but declines in colon adenocarcinoma paralleling the tumour’s dedifferentiation. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 2003; 39: 1251-1258
  • 42 Edvardsson K, Ström A, Jonsson P et al. Estrogen receptor β induces antiinflammatory and antitumorigenic networks in colon cancer cells. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md) 2011; 25: 969-979
  • 43 Sharma R, Zucknick M, London R et al. Systemic inflammatory response predicts prognosis in patients with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Clinical colorectal cancer 2008; 7: 331-337
  • 44 Sharma A, Greenman J, Walker LG et al. Differences in cytokine levels due to gender in colorectal cancer patients. Cytokine 2010; 50: 91-93
  • 45 Della Torre S, Biserni A, Rando G et al. The conundrum of estrogen receptor oscillatory activity in the search for an appropriate hormone replacement therapy. Endocrinology 2011; 152: 2256-2265
  • 46 Amos-Landgraf JM, Heijmans J, Wielenga MC et al. Sex disparity in colonic adenomagenesis involves promotion by male hormones, not protection by female hormones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2014; 111: 16514-16519
  • 47 Goldstein NS, Armin M. Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical reactivity in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV colon adenocarcinoma: implications for a standardized scoring system. Cancer 2001; 92: 1331-1346
  • 48 Rego RL, Foster NR, Smyrk TC et al. Prognostic effect of activated EGFR expression in human colon carcinomas: comparison with EGFR status. British journal of cancer 2010; 102: 165-172
  • 49 Saif MW. Colorectal cancer in review: the role of the EGFR pathway. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 2010; 19: 357-369
  • 50 Laskin JJ, Sandler AB. Epidermal growth factor receptor: a promising target in solid tumours. Cancer treatment reviews 2004; 30: 1-17
  • 51 Bonaccorsi L, Muratori M, Carloni V et al. The androgen receptor associates with the epidermal growth factor receptor in androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells. Steroids 2004; 69: 549-552
  • 52 Levin ER. Bidirectional Signaling between the Estrogen Receptor and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Molecular Endocrinology 2003; 17: 309-317
  • 53 Traish AM, Morgentaler A. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression escapes androgen regulation in prostate cancer: a potential molecular switch for tumour growth. British journal of cancer 2009; 101: 1949-1956
  • 54 Press OA, Zhang W, Gordon MA et al. Gender-Related Survival Differences Associated with EGFR Polymorphisms in Metastatic Colon Cancer. Cancer research 2008; 68: 3037-3042
  • 55 Buerger H, Gebhardt F, Schmidt H et al. Length and loss of heterozygosity of an intron 1 polymorphic sequence of egfr is related to cytogenetic alterations and epithelial growth factor receptor expression. Cancer research 2000; 60: 854-857
  • 56 Wichmann MW, Müller C, Hornung HM et al. Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. The British journal of surgery 2001; 88: 1092-1098
  • 57 Paulson EC, Wirtalla C, Armstrong K et al. Gender influences treatment and survival in colorectal cancer surgery. Diseases of the colon and rectum 2009; 52: 1982-1991
  • 58 Sato H, Maeda K, Sugihara K et al. High-risk stage II colon cancer after curative resection. Journal of surgical oncology 2011; 104: 45-52
  • 59 André T, Boni C, Navarro M et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009; 27: 3109-3116
  • 60 Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP et al. Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. The New England journal of medicine 2005; 352: 2696-2704
  • 61 Gray R, Barnwell J, McConkey C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Lancet 2007; 370: 2020-2029
  • 62 Pox C, Aretz S, Bischoff S et al. S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom Version 1.0 – Juni 2013 AWMF Registernummer: 021/007OL. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 2013; 51: 753-854
  • 63 Giacchetti S, Bjarnason G, Garufi C et al. Phase III trial comparing 4-day chronomodulated therapy versus 2-day conventional delivery of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Can. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006; 24: 3562-3569
  • 64 Levi F, Gorlia T, Tubiana N et al. Gender as a predictor for optimal dynamic scheduling of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results from EORTC randomized phase III trial 05963. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 2005; 23: 3587
  • 65 Loupakis F, Bria E, Vaccaro V et al. Magnitude of benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research: CR 2010; 29: 58
  • 66 Seymour MT, Maughan TS, Ledermann JA et al. Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 143-152
  • 67 de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000; 18: 2938-2947
  • 68 Stein BN, Petrelli NJ, Douglass HO et al. Age and sex are independent predictors of 5-fluorouracil toxicity. Analysis of a large scale phase III trial. Cancer 1995; 75: 11-17
  • 69 Chansky K, Benedetti J, Macdonald JS. Differences in toxicity between men and women treated with 5-fluorouracil therapy for colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 103: 1165-1171