Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31(03): 216-227
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555617
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Management of the Deviated Nasal Dorsum

Myriam Loyo
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, OSHU, Portland, Oregon
,
Tom D. Wang
2   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, OHSU, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 June 2015 (online)

Abstract

The deviated nasal dorsum veers off the ideal straight vertical orientation at midline. Deviations in the dorsum lead to functional and aesthetic consequences that frequently prompt the patient to seek consultation with a rhinoplasty surgeon. Inability to breathe through the nose and self-image perception significantly detracts from the patient's quality of life. Correction of the deviated nasal dorsum represents a challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon. Anatomic correction of deviations is the goal. Straightening a deviated nasal dorsum will require maneuvers to realign the nose distinct from traditional aesthetic rhinoplasty techniques. The nasal dorsum is formed by the three-dimensional structures of the septum, the bony nasal pyramid, and the cartilaginous nasal midvault. Restoring the position of the septum at midline is the first step in providing adequate support to the nasal architecture. Extracorporeal septoplasty and anterior septal transplant are often necessary techniques to correct the septum and achieve dorsal correction. Subsequently, asymmetric maneuvers to bony dorsum and midvault are performed to restore symmetry. Asymmetric hump reduction and nasal osteotomies are often necessary. Supporting the midvault to avoid nasal collapse often requires asymmetric maneuvers to the upper lateral cartilages and asymmetric spreader grafts. Finally, camouflaging grafts to the nasal dorsum may be necessary. Significant rigidity and memory of the native tissues must be overcome to successfully straighten a nose. The surgeon who can master the deviated dorsum will significantly improve the appearance and quality of life of the patients he or she treats.

 
  • References

  • 1 Roxbury C, Ishii M, Godoy A , et al. Impact of crooked nose rhinoplasty on observer perceptions of attractiveness. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (4) 773-778
  • 2 Cingi C, Eskiizmir G. Deviated nose attenuates the degree of patient satisfaction and quality of life in rhinoplasty: a prospective controlled study. Clin Otolaryngol 2013; 38 (2) 136-141
  • 3 Renner GJ. Management of nasal fractures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1991; 24 (1) 195-213
  • 4 Thomson C, Mendelsohn M. Reducing the incidence of revision rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol 2007; 36 (2) 130-134
  • 5 Yu K, Kim A, Pearlman SJ. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12 (5) 291-297
  • 6 Parkes ML, Kanodia R, Machida BK. Revision rhinoplasty. An analysis of aesthetic deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118 (7) 695-701
  • 7 Guyuron B, Zarandy S. Does rhinoplasty make the nose more susceptible to fracture?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (2) 313-317
  • 8 Fry H. Nasal skeletal trauma and the interlocked stresses of the nasal septal cartilage. Br J Plast Surg 1967; 20 (2) 146-158
  • 9 Vora NM, Fedok FG. Management of the central nasal support complex in naso-orbital ethmoid fractures. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16 (2) 181-191
  • 10 Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L , et al. Management of the medial canthal tendon in nasoethmoid orbital fractures: the importance of the central fragment in classification and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (5) 843-853
  • 11 Ishii LE, Rhee JS. Are diagnostic tests useful for nasal valve compromise?. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (1) 7-8
  • 12 Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams Jr WP. The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (6) 1509-1523 , discussion 1524–1525
  • 13 Jang YJ, Wang JH, Lee BJ. Classification of the deviated nose and its treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134 (3) 311-315
  • 14 Stranc MF, Robertson GA. A classification of injuries of the nasal skeleton. Ann Plast Surg 1979; 2 (6) 468-474
  • 15 Harrison DH. Nasal injuries: their pathogenesis and treatment. Br J Plast Surg 1979; 32 (1) 57-64
  • 16 Hwang K, You SH, Kim SG, Lee SI. Analysis of nasal bone fractures: a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17 (2) 261-264
  • 17 Kim HS, Suh HW, Ha KY, Kim BY, Kim TY. The usefulness of the endonasal incisional approach for the treatment of nasal bone fracture. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (3) 209-215
  • 18 Kim DW, Toriumi DM. Management of posttraumatic nasal deformities: the crooked nose and the saddle nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12 (1) 111-132
  • 19 Chegar B, Tatum SA. Cummings Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. In: Flint P, , ed. Vol Part 3. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2010
  • 20 Reilly MJ, Davison SP. Open vs closed approach to the nasal pyramid for fracture reduction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (2) 82-86
  • 21 Khwaja S, Pahade AV, Luff D, Green MW, Green KM. Nasal fracture reduction: local versus general anaesthesia. Rhinology 2007; 45 (1) 83-88
  • 22 Cook JA, McRae RD, Irving RM, Dowie LN. A randomized comparison of manipulation of the fractured nose under local and general anaesthesia. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1990; 15 (4) 343-346
  • 23 Staffel JG. Optimizing treatment of nasal fractures. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (10) 1709-1719
  • 24 Dickson MG, Sharpe DT. A prospective study of nasal fractures. J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100 (5) 543-551
  • 25 Murray JA, Maran AG, Mackenzie IJ, Raab G. Open v closed reduction of the fractured nose. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110 (12) 797-802
  • 26 DeFatta RJ, Ducic Y, Adelson RT, Sabatini PR. Comparison of closed reduction alone versus primary open repair of acute nasoseptal fractures. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 37 (4) 502-506
  • 27 Foda HM. The role of septal surgery in management of the deviated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (2) 406-415
  • 28 Most SP. Anterior septal reconstruction: outcomes after amodified extracorporeal septoplasty technique. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (3) 202-207
  • 29 Gubisch W. Twenty-five years experience with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (4) 230-239
  • 30 Wilson MA, Mobley SR. Extracorporeal septoplasty: complications and new techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (2) 85-90
  • 31 Toriumi DM. Subtotal septal reconstruction: an update. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (6) 492-501
  • 32 Rimmer J, Ferguson LM, Saleh HA. Versatile applications of the polydioxanone plate in rhinoplasty and septal surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14 (5) 323-330
  • 33 Sevin A, Sevin K, Erdogan B, Adanali G, Deren O. A useful method for planning hump resection of deviated nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006; 30 (4) 433-436
  • 34 Kim JK, Lee JS, Lee HM, Cho JH. A simple technique for correcting the hump on a deviated nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006; 30 (6) 686-688
  • 35 Bloom JD, Immerman SB, Constantinides M. Osteotomies in the crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (5) 456-466
  • 36 Most SP, Murakami CS. A modern approach to nasal osteotomies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (1) 85-92
  • 37 Seyhan A, Ozden S, Gungor M, Celik D. A double-layered, stepped spreader graft for the deviated nose. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (6) 604-608
  • 38 Gürlek A, Celik M, Fariz A, Ersöz-Oztürk A, Eren AT, Tenekeci G. The use of high-density porous polyethylene as a custom-made nasal spreader graft. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006; 30 (1) 34-41
  • 39 Lee JW, Baker SR. Correction of caudal septal deviation and deformity using nasal septal bone grafts. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (2) 96-100
  • 40 Dini GM, Iurk LK, Ferreira MC, Ferreira LM. Grafts for straightening deviated noses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (5) 529e-537e