Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(08): 706-714
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556873
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Munich Lung Transplant Group: Intraoperative Extracorporeal Circulation in Lung Transplantation

Dominik J. Hoechter
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
*   Both the authors contributed equally to this work.
,
Vera von Dossow
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
*   Both the authors contributed equally to this work.
,
Hauke Winter
2   Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Hans-Helge Müller
3   University of Marburg, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Germany
,
Bruno Meiser
4   Transplantation Center, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Claus Neurohr
5   Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Juergen Behr
5   Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Sabina Guenther
6   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Christian Hagl
6   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
René Schramm
4   Transplantation Center, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
6   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 March 2015

13 May 2015

Publication Date:
20 August 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background This retrospective single-center study aimed to analyze transfusion requirements, coagulation parameters, and outcome parameters in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LuTx) with intraoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, comparing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods Over a 3-year period, 49 of a total of 188 LuTx recipients were identified being set intraoperatively on either conventional CPB (n = 22) or ECMO (n = 27). Intra- and postoperative transfusion and coagulation factor requirements as well as early outcome parameters were analyzed.

Results LuTx patients on CPB had significantly higher intraoperative transfusion requirements when compared with ECMO patients, that is, packed red cells (9 units [5–18] vs. 6 units [4–8], p = 0.011), platelets (3.5 units [2–4] vs. 2 units [0–3], p = 0.034), fibrinogen (5 g [4–6] vs. 0 g [0–4], p = 0.013), prothrombin complex concentrate (3 iU [2–5] vs. 0 iU [0–2], p = 0.001), and tranexamic acid (2.5 mg [2–5] vs. 2.0 mg [1–3], p = 0.002). Also, ventilator support requirements (21days [7–31] vs. 5 days [3–21], p = 0.013) and lengths of ICU stays (36 days [14–62] vs. 15 days [6–44], p = 0.030) were markedly longer in CPB patients. There were no differences in 30-day and 1-year mortality rates.

Conclusion These data indicate a perioperative advantage of ECMO usage with low-dose heparinization over conventional CPB for extracorporeal circulatory support during LuTx. Long-term outcome is not affected.

Authors' Contribution

D. J. Hoechter and V. von Dossow contributed equally in pre-, intra-, and postoperative patient treatment; designing the study protocol; conducting the analyses, the collection, and interpretation of data; and preparation and revision of the manuscript.


H. W., B. M., C. N., J. B., S. G., C. H., and R. S. participated in pre-, intra-, and postoperative patient treatment; data interpretation and preparation; and revision of the manuscript. H.-H. M. performed the statistical analyses, data interpretation, and revision of the manuscript. R. S. designed the study protocol.


J. B. is a member of the German Center for Lung Research.


 
  • References

  • 1 Cooper JD, Patterson GA, Trulock EP ; Washington University Lung Transplant Group. Results of single and bilateral lung transplantation in 131 consecutive recipients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107 (2) 460-470 , discussion 470–471
  • 2 Neurohr C, Huppmann P, Zimmermann G , et al; Munich Lung Transplant Group. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as first line immunosuppression after lung transplantation. Transpl Int 2009; 22 (6) 635-643
  • 3 Ius F, Kuehn C, Tudorache I , et al. Lung transplantation on cardiopulmonary support: venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outperformed cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144 (6) 1510-1516
  • 4 Diso D, Venuta F, Anile M , et al. Extracorporeal circulatory support for lung transplantation: institutional experience. Transplant Proc 2010; 42 (4) 1281-1282
  • 5 Triantafillou AN, Pasque MK, Huddleston CB , et al. Predictors, frequency, and indications for cardiopulmonary bypass during lung transplantation in adults. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57 (5) 1248-1251
  • 6 Nagendran M, Maruthappu M, Sugand K. Should double lung transplant be performed with or without cardiopulmonary bypass?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12 (5) 799-804
  • 7 Szeto WY, Kreisel D, Karakousis GC , et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass for bilateral sequential lung transplantation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without adverse effect on lung function or clinical outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124 (2) 241-249
  • 8 Asimakopoulos G, Smith PL, Ratnatunga CP, Taylor KM. Lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68 (3) 1107-1115
  • 9 McRae K. Con: lung transplantation should not be routinely performed with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14 (6) 746-750
  • 10 Aigner C, Wisser W, Taghavi S , et al. Institutional experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31 (3) 468-473 , discussion 473–474
  • 11 Machuca TN, Collaud S, Mercier O , et al. Outcomes of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus cardiopulmonary bypass for lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (4) 1152-1157
  • 12 Cypel M, Keshavjee S. Extracorporeal life support as a bridge to lung transplantation. Clin Chest Med 2011; 32 (2) 245-251
  • 13 Fuehner T, Kuehn C, Hadem J , et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in awake patients as bridge to lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185 (7) 763-768
  • 14 Fischer S, Bohn D, Rycus P , et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26 (5) 472-477
  • 15 Bittner HB, Binner C, Lehmann S, Kuntze T, Rastan A, Mohr FW. Replacing cardiopulmonary bypass with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31 (3) 462-467 , discussion 467
  • 16 Diamond JM, Lee JC, Kawut SM , et al; Lung Transplant Outcomes Group. Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187 (5) 527-534
  • 17 Bittner HB, Lehmann S, Rastan A , et al. Outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation and graft recovery. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94 (3) 942-949 , author reply 949–950