Download PDF
Semin Neurol 2015; 35(05): 549-556
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563573
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Prognosis and Treatment of Visual Field Defects

Aniruddha Agarwal
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute, Omaha, Nebraska
,
Sachin Kedar
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute, Omaha, Nebraska
2   Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 October 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Visual field deficits are common in neurologic disease conditions such as cerebrovascular disease, traumatic brain injury, and brain tumors. Loss of visual fields may lead to impairment of reading skills (hemianopic dyslexia) and limitations of daily activities such as driving, which can have a significant impact on an individual's socioeconomic status and quality of life. Moreover, patients with motor deficits from neurologic diseases have a 20% decreased likelihood of achieving independence in ambulation and self-care activities with coexisting hemianopia. Studies on the natural history of homonymous hemianopia have shown that spontaneous improvement of visual fields may occur in less than 40% of individuals early in the disease process. Improvement is usually incomplete, which implies that a significant number of individuals will be left with a disabling visual deficit. Although several methods of rehabilitation (optical, compensatory, and restitution therapy) are used in practice, none, unfortunately, have shown consistent and significant benefits. In this review, the authors focus on the natural history, impact, prognosis, and treatment modalities for neurologic field defects.

Keywords

visual field defect - hemianopia - driving - rehabilitation - quality of life - reading
 

  • References

  • 1 Pouget MC, Lévy-Bencheton D, Prost M, Tilikete C, Husain M, Jacquin-Courtois S. Acquired visual field defects rehabilitation: critical review and perspectives. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2012; 55 (1) 53-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Qiu M, Wang SY, Singh K, Lin SC. Association between visual field defects and quality of life in the United States. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (3) 733-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Evans JR, Fletcher AE, Wormald RP. Depression and anxiety in visually impaired older people. Ophthalmology 2007; 114 (2) 283-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yuki K, Tanabe S, Kouyama K , et al. The association between visual field defect severity and fear of falling in primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54 (12) 7739-7745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ramulu P. Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease?. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009; 20 (2) 92-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dulin D, Cavezian C, Serrière C, Bachoud-Levi AC, Bartolomeo P, Chokron S. Colour, face, and visuospatial imagery abilities in low-vision individuals with visual field deficits. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2011; 64 (10) 1955-1970
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ney JJ, Volpe NJ, Liu GT, Balcer LJ, Moster ML, Galetta SL. Functional visual loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Ophthalmology 2009; 116 (9) 1808-1813.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1992; 99 (6) 933-943
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC , et al; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122 (4) 477-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ferris III FL, Fine SL, Hyman L. Age-related macular degeneration and blindness due to neovascular maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102 (11) 1640-1642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sengupta S, Nguyen AM, van Landingham SW , et al. Evaluation of real-world mobility in age-related macular degeneration. BMC Ophthalmol 2015; 15: 9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA , et al. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2001; 108 (10) 1893-1900 , discussion 1900–1901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Araie M. Pattern of visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1995; 6 (2) 36-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bayer AU, Erb C. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology 2002; 109 (5) 1009-1017
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Araie M, Yamagami J, Suziki Y. Visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1993; 100 (12) 1808-1814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cheng HC, Guo CY, Chen MJ, Ko YC, Huang N, Liu CJ. Patient-reported vision-related quality of life differences between superior and inferior hemifield visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133 (3) 269-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 McKean-Cowdin R, Wang Y, Wu J, Azen SP, Varma R ; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2008; 115 (6) 941-948.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zhang X, Kedar S, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. Neurology 2006; 66 (6) 906-910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kedar S, Zhang X, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Congruency in homonymous hemianopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143 (5) 772-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kedar S, Ghate D, Corbett JJ. Visual fields in neuro-ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011; 59 (2) 103-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW ; Optic Neuritis Study Group. Baseline visual field profile of optic neuritis. The experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111 (2) 231-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW. Visual field profile of optic neuritis. One-year follow-up in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112 (7) 946-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wall M. The importance of visual field testing in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2014; 20 (4 Neuro-ophthalmology): 1067-1074
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB. Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: natural history of visual outcome. Ophthalmology 2008; 115 (2) 298-305.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Neil R, Miller FBW, Hoyt WF. Walsh & Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Foroozan R. Chiasmal syndromes. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003; 14 (6) 325-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ogra S, Nichols AD, Stylli S, Kaye AH, Savino PJ, Danesh-Meyer HV. Visual acuity and pattern of visual field loss at presentation in pituitary adenoma. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21 (5) 735-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kerrison JB, Lynn MJ, Baer CA, Newman SA, Biousse V, Newman NJ. Stages of improvement in visual fields after pituitary tumor resection. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130 (6) 813-820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Moon CH, Hwang SC, Kim BT, Ohn YH, Park TK. Visual prognostic value of optical coherence tomography and photopic negative response in chiasmal compression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52 (11) 8527-8533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kedar S, Zhang X, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Pediatric homonymous hemianopia. J AAPOS 2006; 10 (3) 249-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Barker WH, Mullooly JP. Stroke in a defined elderly population, 1967-1985. A less lethal and disabling but no less common disease. Stroke 1997; 28 (2) 284-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Çelebisoy M, Çelebisoy N, Bayam E, Köse T. Recovery of visual-field defects after occipital lobe infarction: a perimetric study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82 (6) 695-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bosley TM, Dann R, Silver FL , et al. Recovery of vision after ischemic lesions: positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1987; 21 (5) 444-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Raposo N, Cauquil AS, Albucher JF , et al. Poststroke conscious visual deficit: clinical course and changes in cerebral activations. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25 (8) 703-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Maya-Vetencourt JF, Pizzorusso T. Molecular mechanisms at the basis of plasticity in the developing visual cortex: epigenetic processes and gene programs. J Exp Neurosci 2013; 7: 75-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Maya-Vetencourt JF, Origlia N. Visual cortex plasticity: a complex interplay of genetic and environmental influences. Neural Plast 2012; 2012: 631965
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Medini P, Pizzorusso T. Visual experience and plasticity of the visual cortex: a role for epigenetic mechanisms. Front Biosci 2008; 13: 3000-3007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 McKean-Cowdin R, Varma R, Wu J, Hays RD, Azen SP ; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143 (6) 1013-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gall C, Mueller I, Franke GH, Sabel BA. Psychological distress is associated with vision-related but not with generic quality of life in patients with visual field defects after cerebral lesions. Ment Illn 2012; 4 (2) e12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gall C, Lucklum J, Sabel BA, Franke GH. Vision- and health-related quality of life in patients with visual field loss after postchiasmatic lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50 (6) 2765-2776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gall C, Brösel D, Sabel BA. Remaining visual field and preserved subjective visual functioning prevent mental distress in patients with visual field defects. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 584
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 de Haan GA, Heutink J, Melis-Dankers BJ, Brouwer WH, Tucha O. Difficulties in daily life reported by patients with homonymous visual field defects. J Neuroophthalmol 2015; (Mar): 26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kasneci E, Sippel K, Heister M , et al. Homonymous visual field loss and its impact on visual exploration: a supermarket study. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2014; 3 (6) 2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Schuett S. The rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia. Nat Rev Neurol 2009; 5 (8) 427-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Zihl J. Eye movement patterns in hemianopic dyslexia. Brain 1995; 118 (Pt 4): 891-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81 (10) 1357-1363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach. Stroke 1988; 19 (11) 1354-1358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lövsund P, Hedin A, Törnros J. Effects on driving performance of visual field defects: a driving simulator study. Accid Anal Prev 1991; 23 (4) 331-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Coeckelbergh TR, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Van Wolffelaar P, Kooijman AC. The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator study. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120 (11) 1509-1516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Bron AM, Viswanathan AC, Thelen U , et al. International vision requirements for driver licensing and disability pensions: using a milestone approach in characterization of progressive eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4: 1361-1369
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Visual standards vision requirements for driving safety with emphasis on individual assessment. Report prepared for the International Council of Ophthalmology. 2005 . Available at: http://www.icoph.org/dynamic/attachments/resources/visionfordriving.pdf . Accessed March 31, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Physician's Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers. 2010 . Available at: www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/older_drivers/pdf/811298.pdf . Accessed March 31, 2015
    PubMed
  • 53 Kerkhoff G. Restorative and compensatory therapy approaches in cerebral blindness - a review. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1999; 15 (2-3) 255-271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Pollock A, Hazelton C, Henderson CA , et al. Interventions for visual field defects in patients with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (10) CD008388
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Rowe FJ, Wright D, Brand D , et al. A prospective profile of visual field loss following stroke: prevalence, type, rehabilitation, and outcome. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 719096
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Rossi PW, Kheyfets S, Reding MJ. Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect. Neurology 1990; 40 (10) 1597-1599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Nelles G, Pscherer A, de Greiff A , et al. Eye-movement training-induced plasticity in patients with post-stroke hemianopia. J Neurol 2009; 256 (5) 726-733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Gold DR, Grover LL. Treatment of homonymous visual field defects. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2012; 14 (1) 73-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Schreiber A, Vonthein R, Reinhard J, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Connert C, Schiefer U. Effect of visual restitution training on absolute homonymous scotomas. Neurology 2006; 67 (1) 143-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 McFadzean RM. NovaVision: vision restoration therapy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17 (6) 498-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Mueller I, Mast H, Sabel BA. Recovery of visual field defects: a large clinical observational study using vision restoration therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25 (5-6) 563-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Trauzettel-Klosinski S. [Visual rehabilitation training for homonymous field defects]. Ophthalmologe 2012; 109 (5) 496-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Spitzyna GA, Wise RJ, McDonald SA , et al. Optokinetic therapy improves text reading in patients with hemianopic alexia: a controlled trial. Neurology 2007; 68 (22) 1922-1930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Das A, Tadin D, Huxlin KR. Beyond blindsight: properties of visual relearning in cortically blind fields. J Neurosci 2014; 34 (35) 11652-11664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Peli E. Field expansion for homonymous hemianopia by optically induced peripheral exotropia. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77 (9) 453-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Bowers AR, Keeney K, Peli E. Community-based trial of a peripheral prism visual field expansion device for hemianopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126 (5) 657-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Giorgi RG, Woods RL, Peli E. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86 (5) 492-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Goodwin D. Homonymous hemianopia: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8: 1919-1927
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Bowers AR, Keeney K, Peli E. Randomized crossover clinical trial of real and sham peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132 (2) 214-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Schofield TM, Leff AP. Rehabilitation of hemianopia. Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22 (1) 36-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Kasten E, Wüst S, Behrens-Baumann W, Sabel BA. Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nat Med 1998; 4 (9) 1083-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Watanabe K, Shinoda K, Kimura I, Mashima Y, Oguchi Y, Ohde H. Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143 (2) 295-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Pelak VS, Dubin M, Whitney E. Homonymous hemianopia: a critical analysis of optical devices, compensatory training, and NovaVision. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2007; 9 (1) 41-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Roth T, Sokolov AN, Messias A, Roth P, Weller M, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Comparing explorative saccade and flicker training in hemianopia: a randomized controlled study. Neurology 2009; 72 (4) 324-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Passamonti C, Bertini C, Làdavas E. Audio-visual stimulation improves oculomotor patterns in patients with hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47 (2) 546-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Wood JM, McGwin Jr G, Elgin J , et al. Hemianopic and quadrantanopic field loss, eye and head movements, and driving. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52 (3) 1220-1225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Corbett JJ, Jacobson DM, Mauer RC, Thompson HS. Enlargement of the blind spot caused by papilledema. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105 (3) 261-265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Wall M. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurol Clin 2010; 28 (3) 593-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Amore FM, Silvestri V, Turco S, De Rossi F, Cruciani F. Rehabilitative approach in patients with ring scotoma. Can J Ophthalmol 2013; 48 (5) 420-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Johnson A, Gurnsey R. Size scaling compensates for sensitivity loss produced by a simulated central scotoma in a shape-from-texture task. J Vis 2010; 10 (12) 18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Altpeter EK, Blanke BR, Leo-Kottler B, Nguyen XN, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Evaluation of fixation pattern and reading ability in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol 2013; 33 (4) 344-348
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Pacella E, Pacella F, Mazzeo F , et al. Effectiveness of vision rehabilitation treatment through MP-1 microperimeter in patients with visual loss due to macular disease. Clin Ter 2012; 163 (6) e423-e428
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Verboschi F, Domanico D, Nebbioso M, Corradetti G, Zaccaria Scalinci S, Vingolo EM. New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction. Funct Neurol 2013; 28 (4) 285-291
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Verdina T, Giacomelli G, Sodi A , et al. Biofeedback rehabilitation of eccentric fixation in patients with Stargardt disease. Eur J Ophthalmol 2013; 23 (5) 723-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Gaffney AJ, Margrain TH, Bunce CV, Binns AM. How effective is eccentric viewing training? A systematic literature review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34 (4) 427-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Sabel BA, Kasten E. Restoration of vision by training of residual functions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2000; 11 (6) 430-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Kerkhoff G, Münßinger U, Haaf E, Eberle-Strauss G, Stögerer E. Rehabilitation of homonymous scotomata in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system: saccadic compensation training. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1992; 4 (4) 245-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar