Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26(01): 022-028
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563673
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Screening and Treatment of Tethered Spinal Cord in Anorectal Malformation Patients

Desiree van den Hondel
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Cornelius Sloots
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
T. H. Rob de Jong
2   Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Maarten Lequin
3   Department of Pediatric Radiology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Rene Wijnen
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 March 2015

10 July 2015

Publication Date:
21 September 2015 (online)

Abstract

Introduction This study aims to evaluate diagnosis and treatment of tethered spinal cord (TSC) in anorectal malformation (ARM) patients.

Material and Methods A retrospective case study was performed on patients with an ARM born between 2004 and 2011 and treated at the Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital.

Results During the study period, 110 neonates with ARM were treated. Spinal ultrasonography was performed in 94 (85%) patients. Ultrasonography findings were abnormal in 17 patients (18%): 16 had evidence for TSC and 1 for caudal regression. These findings were confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in eight patients. Six of the other 76 patients developed neurologic symptoms and MRI revealed evidence for TSC in 2 of those 6 patients. Thus, sensitivity of spinal ultrasonography was 80%, specificity was 89%, the positive predictive value was 47%, and the negative predictive value was 97%. The prevalence of TSC, as confirmed by MRI, was 9%. Three patients underwent untethering surgery: one patient developed neurologic symptoms and two patients were asymptomatic at the time of surgery (MRI showed progressive syringomyelia in one and the other had a dermal sinus with TSC). All operations were without any complications and the symptoms resolved in the first patient. A relationship between TSC and a specific type of ARM or syndrome disorder could not be found.

Conclusions Tethered cord occurs in 9% of the ARM patients. Neonatal spinal ultrasonography has a sensitivity and specificity of 80 and 89%, respectively. Not in all patients an MRI was performed, but the vast majority remained clinically asymptomatic concerning TSC. Ultrasound screening seems an effective screening method, however, when ultrasonography is negative and the patient becomes symptomatic later in life, an MRI should be performed to exclude TSC. In our series, only 1 of 110 ARM patients had symptomatic tethered cord syndrome, and symptoms resolved postoperatively.

 
  • References

  • 1 The Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Annual report 2011: with data for 2009. Available at: www.icbdsr.org/filebank/documents/ar2005/Report2011.pdf . Accessed December 18, 2013
  • 2 Cho S, Moore SP, Fangman T. One hundred three consecutive patients with anorectal malformations and their associated anomalies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155 (5) 587-591
  • 3 de Blaauw I, Wijers CHW, Schmiedeke E , et al. First results of a European multi-center registry of patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (12) 2530-2535
  • 4 Hassink EAM, Rieu PNMA, Hamel BCJ, Severijnen RS, vd Staak FH, Festen C. Additional congenital defects in anorectal malformations. Eur J Pediatr 1996; 155 (6) 477-482
  • 5 Karrer FM, Flannery AM, Nelson Jr MD, McLone DG, Raffensperger JG. Anorectal malformations: evaluation of associated spinal dysraphic syndromes. J Pediatr Surg 1988; 23 (1 Pt 2) 45-48
  • 6 Golonka NR, Haga LJ, Keating RP , et al. Routine MRI evaluation of low imperforate anus reveals unexpected high incidence of tethered spinal cord. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (7) 966-969 , discussion 966–969
  • 7 Solomon BD, Baker LA, Bear KA , et al. An approach to the identification of anomalies and etiologies in neonates with identified or suspected VACTERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, tracheo-esophageal fistula with esophageal atresia, cardiac anomalies, renal anomalies, and limb anomalies) association. J Pediatr 2014; 164 (3) 451-7.e1
  • 8 Ailawadhi P, Kale SS, Agrawal D, Mahapatra AK, Kumar R. Primary tethered cord syndrome—clinical and urological manifestations, diagnosis and management: a prospective study. Pediatr Neurosurg 2012; 48 (4) 210-215
  • 9 Valentini LG, Selvaggio G, Erbetta A , et al. Occult spinal dysraphism: lessons learned by retrospective analysis of 149 surgical cases about natural history, surgical indications, urodynamic testing, and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (9) 1657-1669
  • 10 Tu A, Steinbok P. Occult tethered cord syndrome: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (9) 1635-1640
  • 11 Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A , et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (10) 1521-1526
  • 12 Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, Cama A. Spinal dysraphism: a review of neuroradiological features with embryological correlations and proposal for a new classification. Neuroradiology 2000; 42 (7) 471-491
  • 13 Kim SM, Chang HK, Lee MJ , et al. Spinal dysraphism with anorectal malformation: lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 120 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (4) 769-776
  • 14 Levitt MA, Patel M, Rodriguez G, Gaylin DS, Pena A. The tethered spinal cord in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (3) 462-468
  • 15 Miyasaka M, Nosaka S, Kitano Y , et al. Utility of spinal MRI in children with anorectal malformation. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (8) 810-816
  • 16 Teo AT, Gan BK, Tung JS, Low Y, Seow WT. Low-lying spinal cord and tethered cord syndrome in children with anorectal malformations. Singapore Med J 2012; 53 (9) 570-576
  • 17 Tuuha SE, Aziz D, Drake J, Wales P, Kim PC. Is surgery necessary for asymptomatic tethered cord in anorectal malformation patients?. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (5) 773-777
  • 18 Uchida K, Inoue M, Matsubara T , et al. Evaluation and treatment for spinal cord tethering in patients with anorectal malformations. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2007; 17 (6) 408-411
  • 19 Scottoni F, Iacobelli BD, Zaccara AM, Totonelli G, Schingo AM, Bagolan P. Spinal ultrasound in patients with anorectal malformations: is this the end of an era?. Pediatr Surg Int 2014; 30 (8) 829-831
  • 20 Azzoni R, Gerevini S, Cabitza P. Spinal cord sonography in newborns: anatomy and diseases. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005; 14 (3) 185-188
  • 21 Solmaz I, Izci Y, Albayrak B , et al. Tethered cord syndrome in childhood: special emphasis on the surgical technique and review of the literature with our experience. Turk Neurosurg 2011; 21 (4) 516-521
  • 22 Suppiej A, Dal Zotto L, Cappellari A , et al. Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25 (10) 851-855
  • 23 Morimoto K, Takemoto O, Wakayama A. Tethered cord associated with anorectal malformation. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 38 (2) 79-82