Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy 2015; 04(04): 207-215
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563727
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart • New York

Contributions of Magnetoencephalography to Characterizing Brain Function in Pediatric Epilepsy: Evidences of Validity and Added Value

Eduardo M. Castillo
1   Magnetoencephalography Laboratory, Florida Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida, United States
2   Comprehensive Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Florida Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida, United States
3   Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
,
Tara Kleineschay
1   Magnetoencephalography Laboratory, Florida Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida, United States
2   Comprehensive Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Florida Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
James E. Baumgartner
2   Comprehensive Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Florida Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 July 2014

04 December 2014

Publication Date:
18 September 2015 (online)

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and magnetic source imaging are considered among the few available noninvasive modalities that can address, in pediatric populations, clinically relevant questions at the individual level. The contribution of MEG to the localization of the irritative zone (based on interictal epileptiform discharges), and the characterization of function-specific cortex (i.e., functional mapping), has proven to be as accurate as those derived from invasive “gold standard” procedures like the intracarotid amobarbital procedure and cortical stimulation mapping. Here, we will review some of the evidences supporting the added value of MEG in the study of pediatric epilepsy with special interest in the seminal studies where the clinical validity of MEG has been established after comparing MEG-derived estimates with those derived from the well-established invasive “gold standard” procedures. In the first section, we revisit a study where MEG is applied to characterize distinct patterns of propagation of interictal epileptiform discharges in relation with the clinical evolution of children with typical and atypical variants of benign rolandic epilepsy. This study serves to illustrate the additional value of MEG's high spatiotemporal resolution. Intralobar, interlobar, and interhemispheric patterns of propagation were demonstrated using MEG and associated to the clinical features exhibited by children with rolandic epilepsy. The second section of this article reviews part of the experience accumulated, in more than 800 clinical cases, by the MEG Laboratory at the University of Texas-Houston. In different studies, MEG-derived estimates for language and sensorimotor functions were compared with those derived from the gold standard invasive procedures (i.e., intracarotid amobarbital procedure and direct cortical stimulation) and tested against surgical outcome measurements. In these studies, authors benefit from some of the strengths of MEG as a valid, and noninvasive, tool to characterize brain function in pediatric population, demonstrating the utility of MEG in studying the issue of epilepsy in the developing brain.

 
  • References

  • 1 Papanicolaou AC. Fundamentals of Functional Brain Imaging: A Guide to the Methods and Their Applications to Psychology and Behavioral Neurosciences. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1998
  • 2 Lewine JD. Neuromagnetic techniques for the noninvasive analysis of brain function. In: Freeman SE, Fukushima E, Greene ER, eds. Noninvasive Techniques in Biology and Medicine. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Press; 1990: 33-74
  • 3 Knowlton RC. Can magnetoencephalography aid epilepsy surgery?. Epilepsy Curr 2008; 8 (1) 1-5
  • 4 Sobel DF, Gallen CC, Schwartz BJ , et al. Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993; 14 (4) 915-925
  • 5 Nakasato N, Kumabe T, Kanno A, Ohtomo S, Mizoi K, Yoshimoto T. Neuromagnetic evaluation of cortical auditory function in patients with temporal lobe tumors. J Neurosurg 1997; 86 (4) 610-618
  • 6 Papanicolaou AC, Simos PG, Breier JI , et al. Magnetoencephalographic mapping of the language-specific cortex. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (1) 85-93
  • 7 Papanicolaou AC, Pataraia E, Billingsley-Marshall R , et al. Toward the substitution of invasive electroencephalography in epilepsy surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 22 (4) 231-237
  • 8 Simos PG, Breier JI, Zouridakis G, Papanicolaou AC. Identification of language-specific brain activity using magnetoencephalography. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998; 20 (5) 706-722
  • 9 Simos PG, Papanicolaou AC, Breier JI , et al. Localization of language-specific cortex by using magnetic source imaging and electrical stimulation mapping. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (5) 787-796
  • 10 Castillo EM, Simos PG, Venkataraman V, Breier JI, Wheless JW, Papanicolaou AC. Mapping of expressive language cortex using magnetic source imaging. Neurocase 2001; 7 (5) 419-422
  • 11 Rosenow F, Lüders H. Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Brain 2001; 124 (Pt 9) 1683-1700
  • 12 Castillo EM, Passaro AD, Li Z, Slater JD, Papanicolaou A. Pattern of Spike Propagation in Typical and Atypical Variants of Benign Rolandic Epilepsy. American Epilepsy Society 61st Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, United States, Volume: Epilepsia, Vol. 48, Supplement 6, 2007
  • 13 Berg AT, Berkovic SF, Brodie MJ , et al. Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 2005-2009. Epilepsia 2010; 51 (4) 676-685
  • 14 Pataraia E, Simos PG, Castillo EM , et al. Does magnetoencephalography add to scalp video-EEG as a diagnostic tool in epilepsy surgery?. Neurology 2004; 62 (6) 943-948
  • 15 Wheless JW, Willmore LJ, Breier JI , et al. A comparison of magnetoencephalography, MRI, and V-EEG in patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 1999; 40 (7) 931-941
  • 16 Gallen CC, Schwartz BJ, Bucholz RD , et al. Presurgical localization of functional cortex using magnetic source imaging. J Neurosurg 1995; 82 (6) 988-994
  • 17 Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 1987; 32 (1) 11-22
  • 18 Papanicolaou AC, Simos PG, Castillo EM , et al. Magnetocephalography: a noninvasive alternative to the Wada procedure. J Neurosurg 2004; 100 (5) 867-876
  • 19 Castillo, et al. Contributions of direct cortical stimulation and MEG recordings to identify “essential” language cortex. Epilepsia 2005; 46 (s8): 324
  • 20 Castillo EM, Simos PG, Wheless JW , et al. Integrating sensory and motor mapping in a comprehensive MEG protocol: clinical validity and replicability. Neuroimage 2004; 21 (3) 973-983
  • 21 Loiseau P, Beaussart M. The seizures of benign childhood epilepsy with Rolandic paroxysmal discharges. Epilepsia 1973; 14 (4) 381-389
  • 22 Gregory DL, Wong PK. Topographical analysis of the centrotemporal discharges in benign rolandic epilepsy of childhood. Epilepsia 1984; 25 (6) 705-711
  • 23 Minami T, Gondo K, Yamamoto T, Yanai S, Tasaki K, Ueda K. Magnetoencephalographic analysis of rolandic discharges in benign childhood epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1996; 39 (3) 326-334
  • 24 Perkins Jr FF, Breier J, McManis MH , et al. Benign rolandic epilepsy — perhaps not so benign: use of magnetic source imaging as a predictor of outcome. J Child Neurol 2008; 23 (4) 389-393
  • 25 Otsubo H, Chitoku S, Ochi A , et al. Malignant rolandic-sylvian epilepsy in children: diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Neurology 2001; 57 (4) 590-596