Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32(04): 424-430
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584554
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Contemporary Issues in the Open Management of Subcondylar Fractures of the Mandible

Jeffrey Cranford
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York
,
Sameep Kadakia
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York
,
Raja Sawhney
2   Department of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Florida Health Science Center, Gainesville, Florida
,
Yadranko Ducic
3   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 August 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Subcondylar fractures encompass a large portion of mandible fractures. Owing to their proximity to the temporomandibular joint and difficulty achieving surgical exposure, treatment of these fractures has been challenging and highly debated throughout the literature. While no one modality is the accepted gold standard, there are multiple options for addressing these fractures that can yield satisfying results for both patient and surgeon alike. A thorough literature review was conducted using PubMed, analyzing articles in the past 15 years for relevance to the subject matter. Various search terms were used to glean information regarding closed treatment, open treatment, and the risks and benefits of the different surgical approaches involved. The articles were reviewed by all of the authors for applicability and quality of data provided. A total of 50 articles were selected for inclusion in the current study. The open management of subcondylar fractures encompasses a vast array of techniques. While some surgeons advocate closed treatment in some circumstances, open treatment affords numerous advantages with the advent of multiple access modalities. There is no single superior method, and as such, the craniofacial surgeon should have a comprehensive understanding of options so as to select the appropriate option that is individualized to the patient. A clear understanding of fracture biomechanics balanced with patient expectations and operative safety allows for the surgeon to make a sound decision for treatment.

Keywords

trauma - condylar fracture - management
 

  • References

  • 1 Ellis III E, Throckmorton GS. Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63 (1) 115-134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Landes CA, Lipphardt R. Prospective evaluation of a pragmatic treatment rationale: open reduction and internal fixation of displaced and dislocated condyle and condylar head fractures and closed reduction of non-displaced, non-dislocated fractures. Part I: condyle and subcondylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34 (8) 859-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mueller RV, Czerwinski M, Lee C, Kellman RM. Condylar fracture repair: use of the endoscope to advance traditional treatment philosophy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2006; 14 (1) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kellman RM. Early mobilization advocated in subcondylar fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (10) 1230-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ellis III E, Kellman RM, Vural E. Subcondylar fractures. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20 (3) 365-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ellis III E. Method to determine when open treatment of condylar process fractures is not necessary. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (8) 1685-1690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hackenberg B, Lee C, Caterson EJ. Management of subcondylar mandible fractures in the adult patient. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (1) 166-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Assael LA. Open versus closed reduction of adult mandibular condyle fractures: an alternative interpretation of the evidence. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61 (11) 1333-1339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Blevins C, Gores R. Fractures of the mandibular condyloid process: results of conservative treatment in 140 patients. J Oral Surg 1961; 19: 28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vural E. Treatment of adult subcondylar mandibular fractures: closed vs open vs endoscopic approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (10) 1228-1230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ernst A, Herzog M, Seidl R. Treatment of injuries of the mandible. Head and Neck Trauma: An Interdisciplinary Approach. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2004: 186-198
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Zide MF, Kent JN. Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41 (2) 89-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Haug RH, Assael LA. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59 (4) 370-375 , discussion 375–376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ellis III E, Throckmorton GS. Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59 (4) 389-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yang WG, Chen CT, Tsay PK, Chen YR. Functional results of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures after open and closed treatment. J Trauma 2002; 52 (3) 498-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Worsaae N, Thorn JJ. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of unilateral dislocated low subcondylar fractures: a clinical study of 52 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52 (4) 353-360 , discussion 360–361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Villarreal PM, Monje F, Junquera LM, Mateo J, Morillo AJ, González C. Mandibular condyle fractures: determinants of treatment and outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62 (2) 155-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ellis III E, Simon P, Throckmorton GS. Occlusal results after open or closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (3) 260-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Eckelt U, Schneider M, Erasmus F , et al. Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process-a prospective randomized multi-centre study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34 (5) 306-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Singh V, Bhagol A, Goel M, Kumar I, Verma A. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (6) 1304-1309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bhagol A, Singh V, Kumar I, Verma A. Prospective evaluation of a new classification system for the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 (4) 1159-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Danda AK, Muthusekhar MR, Narayanan V, Baig MF, Siddareddi A. Open versus closed treatment of unilateral subcondylar and condylar neck fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (6) 1238-1241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Haerle F, Champy M, Terry B. Condylar neck fracture miniplates: extraoral approach. Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Osteosynthesis: Microplates, Miniplates, and Screws. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2009: 67-73
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Handschel J, Rüggeberg T, Depprich R , et al. Comparison of various approaches for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40 (8) e397-e401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ellis III E, Zide MF. Preauricular approach. Approaches to the Facial Skeleton. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 193-212
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Sawhney R, Brown R, Ducic Y. Condylar fractures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2013; 46 (5) 779-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Liao HT, Wang PF, Chen CT. Experience with the transparotid approach via a mini-preauricular incision for surgical management of condylar neck fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (8) 1595-1601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Widmark G, Bågenholm T, Kahnberg KE, Lindahl L. Open reduction of subcondylar fractures. A study of functional rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 25 (2) 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ellis III E, McFadden D, Simon P, Throckmorton G. Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (9) 950-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vesnaver A, Gorjanc M, Eberlinc A, Dovsak DA, Kansky AA. The periauricular transparotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005; 33 (3) 169-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Saikrishna D, Shetty SK, Reshma VP. A comparative evaluation of rhytidectomy versus retromandibular approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of mandibular condylar fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2009; 8 (1) 13-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chossegros C, Cheynet F, Blanc JL, Bourezak Z. Short retromandibular approach of subcondylar fractures: clinical and radiologic long-term evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82 (3) 248-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Choi BH, Yoo JH. Open reduction of condylar neck fractures with exposure of the facial nerve. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88 (3) 292-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Narayanan V, Ramadorai A, Ravi P, Nirvikalpa N. Transmasseteric anterior parotid approach for condylar fractures: experience of 129 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50 (5) 420-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Salgarelli AC, Anesi A, Bellini P , et al. How to improve retromandibular transmasseteric anteroparotid approach for mandibular condylar fractures: our clinical experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42 (4) 464-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Colletti G, Battista VM, Allevi F, Giovanditto F, Rabbiosi D, Biglioli F. Extraoral approach to mandibular condylar fractures: our experience with 100 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (5) e186-e194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schön R, Gutwald R, Schramm A, Gellrich NC, Schmelzeisen R. Endoscopy-assisted open treatment of condylar fractures of the mandible: extraoral vs intraoral approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31 (3) 237-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Nogami S, Takahashi T, Yamauchi K , et al. Clinical comparison between the retromandibular approach for reduction and fixation and endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular condyle fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (6) 1815-1818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Schmelzeisen R, Cienfuegos-Monroy R, Schön R, Chen CT, Cunningham Jr L, Goldhahn S. Patient benefit from endoscopically assisted fixation of condylar neck fractures—a randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (1) 147-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ducic Y. Endoscopic treatment of subcondylar fractures. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (7) 1164-1167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kellman RM, Cienfuegos R. Endoscopic approaches to subcondylar fractures of the mandible. Facial Plast Surg 2009; 25 (1) 23-28
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Troulis MJ, Kaban LB. Endoscopic approach to the ramus/condyle unit: Clinical applications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59 (5) 503-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Eroğlu L, Aksakal IA, Keleş MK, Yağmur Ç, Aslan O, Şimşek T. The synergy between endoscopic assistance and extraoral approach in subcondylar fracture repair: a report of 13 cases. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2013; 19 (5) 434-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lo J, Cheung LK. Endoscopic-assisted rigid fixation of condylar fracture: a technical note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64 (9) 1443-1446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Aboelatta YA, Elbarbary AS, Abdelazeem S, Massoud KS, Safe II. Minimizing the submandibular incision in endoscopic subcondylar fracture repair. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2015; 8 (4) 315-320
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kanno T, Sukegawa S, Fujioka M, Takabatake K, Furuki Y. Transoral open reduction with rigid internal fixation for subcondylar fractures of the mandible using a small angulated screwdriver system: is endoscopic assistance necessary?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 (11) e372-e384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Vajgel A, Santos TdeS, Camargo IB , et al. Treatment of condylar fractures with an intraoral approach using an angulated screwdriver: results of a multicentre study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (1) 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Nam SM, Kim YB, Cha HG, Wee SY, Choi CY. Transoral open reduction for subcondylar fractures of the mandible using an angulated screwdriver system. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (3) 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hammer B, Schier P, Prein J. Osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures: a review of 30 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 35 (4) 288-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Cortelazzi R, Altacera M, Turco M, Antonicelli V, De Benedittis M. Development and clinical evaluation of MatrixMANDIBLE subcondylar plates system (Synthes). Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2015; 8 (2) 94-99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Choi BH, Yi CK, Yoo JH. Clinical evaluation of 3 types of plate osteosynthesis for fixation of condylar neck fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59 (7) 734-737 , discussion 738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Meyer C, Kahn JL, Boutemi P, Wilk A. Photoelastic analysis of bone deformation in the region of the mandibular condyle during mastication. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002; 30 (3) 160-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Meyer C, Zink S, Chatelain B, Wilk A. Clinical experience with osteosynthesis of subcondylar fractures of the mandible using TCP plates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008; 36 (5) 260-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Darwich MA, Albogha MH, Abdelmajeed A , et al. Assessment of the biomechanical performance of 5 plating techniques in fixation of mandibular subcondylar fracture using finite element analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (4) 794.e1-794.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Neff A, Chossegros C, Blanc JL , et al; International Bone Research Association. Position paper from the IBRA Symposium on Surgery of the Head—the 2nd International Symposium for Condylar Fracture Osteosynthesis, Marseille, France, 2012. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (7) 1234-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar