Synlett 2018; 29(10): 1351-1357
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1591563
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

First Total Synthesis of Oxirapentyn D, a Highly Oxidized Chromene Natural Product

Takahiro Sakai
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan   Email: kohmori@chem.titech.ac.jp
,
Keisuke Suzuki
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan   Email: kohmori@chem.titech.ac.jp
,
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan   Email: kohmori@chem.titech.ac.jp
› Author Affiliations
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (No. 16H06351) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 08 February 2018

Accepted after revision: 12 March 2018

Publication Date:
13 April 2018 (online)


Dedicated to Prof. Victor Snieckus on occasion of his 80th birthday

Abstract

The first total synthesis of oxirapentyn D from myo-inositol has been achieved by utilizing chelation-directed bridgehead lithiation of a hydrazone derivative.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Takahashi S. Itoh Y. Takeuchi M. Furuya K. Kodama K. Naito A. Haneishi T. Sato S. Tamura C. J. Antibiot. 1983; 36: 1418
    • 1b Smetanina OF. Yurchenko AN. Afiyatullov SS. Kalinovsky AI. Pushilin MA. Khudyakova YV. Slinkina NN. Ermakova SP. Yurchenko EA. Phytochem. Lett. 2012; 5: 165
    • 1c Yurchenko AN. Smetanina OF. Khudyakova YV. Kirichuk NN. Chaikina EL. Anisimov MM. Afiyatullov SS. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2013; 49: 857
    • 1d Yurchenko AN. Smetanina OF. Kalinovsky AI. Pushilin MA. Glazunov VP. Khudyakova YV. Kirichuk NN. Ermakova SP. Dyshlovoy SA. Yurchenko EA. Afiyatullov SS. J. Nat. Prod. 2014; 77: 1321
    • 3a Lee HW. Kishi Y. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 4402
    • 3b Garret SW. Liu C. Riley AM. Potter BV. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998; 1367
    • 3c Sureshan KM. Devaraj S. Shashidhar MS. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 2703
  • 4 Referred to the numbering of the natural product.
    • 5a Wrobel J. Takahashi K. Honkan V. Lannoye G. Cook JM. Bertz SH. J. Org. Chem. 1983; 48: 139
    • 5b Shiner CS. Berks AH. Fisher AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 957
    • 5c Blake AJ. Giblin GM. P. Kirk DT. Simpkins NS. Wilson C. Chem. Commun. 2001; 2668
    • 5d Hayes CJ. Simpkins NS. Kirk DT. Mitchell L. Baudoux J. Blake AJ. Wilson C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 8196
    • 5e Siegel DR. Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 1048
    • 5f Rodeschini V. Simpkins NS. Wilson C. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 4265
    • 5g Uwamori M. Saito A. Nakada M. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 5098
    • 5h Sparling BA. Moebius DC. Shair MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 644
    • 6a Snieckus V. Chem. Rev. 1990; 90: 879
    • 6b Hartung CG. Snieckus V. In: Modern Arene Chemistry: Concepts, Synthesis, and Applications . Astruc D. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. Chap. 10 330
    • 6c Whisler MC. MacNeil S. Snieckus V. Beak P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 2206
  • 7 The remaining proton in 7 is less acidic due to the hydrogen bonding of the axial hydroxy group to the axial siloxy group; consequently, the oxonium cation was not deprotonated and therefore not silylated.
  • 8 Upon treatment of the MEM-protected precursor with LDA, aldol products were obtained as mixtures of regioisomers and/or diastereomers; see Supporting Information.
    • 9a Corey EJ. Enders D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976; 17: 3
    • 9b Corey EJ. Enders D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976; 17: 11
    • 9c Corey EJ. Enders D. Chem. Ber. 1978; 111: 1362
    • 9d Enders D. Eichenauer H. Angew. Chem. 1976; 88: 579 ; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 549

    • For the use of a bicyclic hydrazone as a bridgehead anion precursor, see:
    • 9e Shiina Y. Tomata Y. Miyashita M. Tanino K. Chem. Lett. 2010; 39: 835
  • 10 The geometry of the hydrazone was determined from the chemical shifts of its α-protons and extensive NMR analysis (NOE); see Supporting Information. The ratio of isomers fluctuated from 9a/9b =2:1 to 10:1.
  • 11 A 5:1 mixture of isomers 9a and 9b was used for the experiments listed in Table 2.
    • 12a Ellefson CR. J. Org. Chem. 1979; 44: 1533
    • 12b Sibi MP. Miah MA. J. Snieckus V. J. Org. Chem. 1984; 49: 737
    • 12c Sibi MP. Chattopadhyay S. Dankwardt JW. Snieckus V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 6312
    • 12d Hartman GD. Halczenko W. Phillips BT. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 2427
  • 13 The structure of 10 was determined by extensive NMR analysis (NOESY, and HMBC). See Supporting Information.
  • 14 For the isomerization of hydrazones, see: Jung ME. Shaw TJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977; 18: 3305
  • 15 For the chelating effect in the deprotonation of imine, see: Liao S. Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 15114
  • 16 Porath B. Rademacher P. Boese R. Bläser D. Z. Naturforsch., B 2002; 57: 365
  • 17 The geometries of hydrazones 11 and 12 were determined by extensive NMR analysis (NOESY); see the Supporting Information.
  • 18 Additionally, the starting material 12 and a regioisomer were each obtained in a 5% yield; see the Supporting Information.
  • 19 1H NMR analysis suggested the methylation occurred selectively at the amino nitrogen of the hydrazone, not at the imino nitrogen, judging from a 6 H singlet for the methyl groups; see Supporting Information.
  • 20 The structure of ketone 14 was determined by 1H and 13C NMR analyses.
  • 21 The equatorial orientation of the C2 iodine atom was assigned by 1H NMR. The J-values between the C2 methine and the C3 methylene protons were 4.4 and 13.1 Hz, respectively, the latter indicating an antiperiplanar relationship of the H2 and H3α protons.
    • 22a Ochiai M. In Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry: Modern Developments in Organic Synthesis. Wirth T. Springer; Berlin: 2003. Chap. 1 5
    • 22b Yoshimura A. Zhdankin VV. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 3328
  • 23 Zhu C. Zhang Y. Zhao H. Huang S. Zhang M. Su W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015; 357: 331
  • 24 The structure of acetate 17 was determined by extensive NMR analysis (NOE and HMBC); see the Supporting Information.
  • 25 Singh FV. Wirth T. Synthesis 2013; 45: 2499
  • 26 mCPBA and basic Oxone gave epoxide 18 and its diastereomer. DMDO afforded no reaction.
    • 27a Sharpless KB. Michaelson RC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973; 95: 6136
    • 27b Mihelich ED. Daniels K. Eickhoff DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981; 103: 7690

    • For an example of vanadium mediated stereoselective epoxidation of bishomoallyl alcohol, see
    • 27c Fukuyama T. Vranesic B. Negri DP. Kishi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978; 19: 2741
    • 28a Stork G. Cohen JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974; 96: 5270
    • 28b Baldwin JE. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976; 734
  • 30 HFIP afforded the best result among several fluorinated alcohols [F3CCH2OH, (F3C)3COH, and PhC(CF3)2OH].
  • 31 The stereochemistry of the C2 hydroxy group was assigned by comparing the H2–H3 coupling constant of 19 with that of its C2 epimer (obtained by oxidation of triol 5 with Oxone; see Supporting Information). The C2 epimer of 19 showed a large coupling constant (J = 11.7 Hz), indicating an equatorial disposition of the C2 hydroxy group. Further support was obtained from the downfield shift of the 2-OH proton of 19 (δ = 3.3), which suggested the presence of hydrogen bonding between the axial hydroxy group and the orthoester oxygen.
  • 32 The structures of 4 and 4′ were determined by 1H and 13C NMR, and by extensive NMR analysis (HMBC): see the Supporting Information.
  • 33 TLC analysis showed that the reaction stopped without obvious reason. There are two conceivable explanations for this. The first is that the oxidant interacted with product 4 or 4′. To examine this possibility, we studied the reverse addition of the alcohol 19 and found that the yield of 4 + 4′ decreased (14%; recovery: 60%). The second is that deprotonation of an adduct of the alcohol and the oxidant was slow. However, addition of base (pyridine) was not effective (4+ 4′: 38%, recovery: 9%).
  • 34 Oxirapentyn D (1) by Nucleophilic Addition of Acetylide 21 to Ketone 4 An equilibrium mixture of ketone 4 and its hydrate 4′ (4.9 mg, 0.017 mmol) was azeotropically dried with toluene and dissolved in THF (0.34 mL). A 0.20 M solution of acetylide 21 in THF (0.43 mL, 0.086 mmol) was added at –78 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at –78 °C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of sat. aq NH4Cl, and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (×3). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (1:1)] to give a white solid; yield: 3.2 mg (53%); mp 213–217 °C (EtOAc–hexane); Rf = 0.57 (hexane–EtOAc, 1:5). IR (neat): 3472, 2955, 2925, 2853, 2226, 1615, 1434, 1402, 1296, 1230, 1176, 1138, 1080, 999, 948, 905, 853, 827 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (s, 3 H), 1.39 (s, 3 H), 1.51 (s, 3 H), 1.78 (dd, J = 15.1, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.91 (t, J = 1.1 Hz, 3 H), 2.52 (dd, J = 15.1, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.16 (s, 1 H, OH), 3.32 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, OH), 3.46 (ddd, J = 11.6, 3.6, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.60 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1 H, OH), 4.02 (dd, J = 9.7, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.12 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.18 (dd, J = 3.4, 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.19–4.20 (m, 1 H), 5.33 (quint, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.38–5.39 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.9, 23.1, 24.4, 26.3, 31.4, 60.1, 68.6, 70.8, 71.0, 72.7, 73.9, 75.8, 76.5, 86.8, 87.7, 108.8, 123.9, 125.5. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H24NaO7: 375.1414; found: 375.1398. UV (MeCN, 6.81 × 10–5 M): λmax (log ε) = 221 (3.47), 228 (3.41) nm.
  • 35 The stereoselectivity is rationalized by the precoordination of alkynyl lithium species with the oxygen-rich functionality on the trioxaadamantane skeleton.
  • 36 CCDC 1581357 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 1. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures.