Dilatation of Vascular Prostheses in Ascending Aortic Position: A Long-Term Follow-Up Computed Tomography Study with Comparison of Different Measurement Methods

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term dilatation of Hemashield Gold and Hemashield Platinum vascular prostheses in ascending aortic position using different measurement methods to obtain precise results.

Methods Between 1999 and 2007, 73 patients with Stanford type A dissection received ascending aortic replacement with Hemashield Gold and Hemashield Platinum prostheses. Measurements were performed using multiplanar reconstruction mode of electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) in strictly orthogonal cross-sectional planes. Different methods of measurement were compared and maximum dilatation was estimated for different time spans.

Results Diameters calculated from the measured circumference showed a significant (p = 0.037) but clinically not relevant difference (0.1 mm) to the mean between the largest and the shortest cross-sectional diameter of the prosthesis. Dilatation after 24.2 ± 10.2 months was 8.5 ± 4.5%. Long-term dilatation after 91.8 ± 34 months amounted to 11.8 ± 4.2%.

Conclusion Based on ECG-gated MSCT images, the presented methods of measurement provided reliable results. Long-term analysis shows low dilatation rates for Hemashield prostheses, which therefore can be considered as safe from this point of view. Nevertheless, a maximal dilatation of 20% could be relevant in valve sparing root replacement. It remains unclear if a dilatation like this contributes to the formation of suture aneurysms.

Keywords

computed tomography - CT scan - aorta/aortic - vascular graft - aneurysm/dissection - imaging

• References

• 1 Hirst Jr AE, Johns Jr VJ, Kime Jr SW. Dissecting aneurysm of the aorta: a review of 505 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1958; 37 (03) 217-279
• 2 Khan IA, Nair CK. Clinical, diagnostic, and management perspectives of aortic dissection. Chest 2002; 122 (01) 311-328
• 3 Harrison JH. Synthetic materials as vascular prostheses. II. A comparative study of nylon, dacron, orlon, ivalon sponge and teflon in large blood vessels with tensile strength studies. Am J Surg 1958; 95 (01) 16-24
• 4 Blumenberg RM, Gelfand ML, Barton EA, Bowers CA, Gittleman DA. Clinical significance of aortic graft dilation. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14 (02) 175-180
• 5 Alimi Y, Juhan C, Morati N, Girard N, Cohen S. Dilation of woven and knitted aortic prosthetic grafts: CT scan evaluation. Ann Vasc Surg 1994; 8 (03) 238-242
• 6 Utoh J, Goto H, Obayashi H, Hirata T, Miyauchi Y. Dilation of gelatin-sealed knitted Dacron prosthesis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1996; 37 (04) 343-344
• 7 Goossens D, Weyers L, Engels P, Hamerlijnck R, Vermeulen F. ‘In vivo’ size of knitted Dacron prostheses (Gelseal) used in the thoracic aorta: a computed tomography study. Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 4 (02) 205-206
• 8 Utoh J, Goto H, Hirata T, Hara M, Kitamura N. Dilatation of sealed Dacron vascular prostheses: a comparison of Gelseal and Hemashield. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1998; 39 (02) 179-180
• 9 Alonso-Pérez M, Segura RJ, Luján S. , et al. Knitted dacron grafts used for abdominal aortic reconstruction: sizing references. Vasc Surg 2001; 35 (06) 457-461
• 10 Geun-Eun-Kim Imparato AM, Nathan I, Riles TS. Dilation of synthetic grafts and junctional aneurysms. Arch Surg 1979; 114 (11) 1296-1303
• 11 den Hoed PT, Veen HF. The late complications of aorto-ilio-femoral Dacron prostheses: dilatation and anastomotic aneurysm formation. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992; 6 (03) 282-287
• 12 Tardito E, Biondo B, Caputo V. , et al. Anastomotic disjunction in long-term patent vascular synthetic grafts in Dacron. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1993; 34 (05) 369-380
• 13 Chakfe N, Riepe G, Dieval F. , et al; Groupe Européen de Recherche sur les Prothèses appliquées à la Chirurgie Vasculaire (GEPROVAS). Longitudinal ruptures of polyester knitted vascular prostheses. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33 (05) 1015-1021
• 14 Nunn DB. Structural failure of first-generation, polyester, double-velour, knitted prostheses. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33 (05) 1131-1132
• 15 Kawata M, Morota T, Takamoto S, Kubota H, Kitahori K. Non-anastomotic rupture in the guideline of a Dacron thoracic aortic graft. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42 (03) 573
• 16 Kawamura M, Ogino H, Matsuda H, Minatoya K, Sasaki H, Kitamura S. Late-stage, nonanastomotic rupture of double-velour Dacron graft after descending aortic replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (04) 961-962
• 17 Franke U, Jurmann MJ, Uthoff K. , et al. In vivo morphology of woven, collagen-sealed Dacron prostheses in the thoracic aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64 (04) 1096-1098
• 18 Mattens E, Engels P, Hamerlijnck R. , et al. Gelseal versus Gelweave dacron prosthetic grafts in the descending thoracic aorta: a two-year computed tomography scan follow-up study. Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 7 (04) 432-435
• 19 Vermeulen F, Schepens M, de Valois J, Wijers L, Kelder J. The Hemashield Woven prosthesis in the thoracic aorta: a prospective computer tomography follow-up study. Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 9 (06) 580-585
• 20 Etz CD, Homann T, Silovitz D. , et al. Vascular graft replacement of the ascending and descending aorta: do Dacron grafts grow?. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84 (04) 1206-1212 , discussion 1212–1213
• 21 Takami Y, Tajima K, Kato W. , et al. Long-term size follow-up of knitted Dacron grafts (Gelseal™) used in the ascending aorta. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 14 (05) 529-531
• 22 Seike Y, Minatoya K, Sasaki H, Tanaka H. Recurrent aortic regurgitation after valve-sparing aortic root replacement due to dilatation of a previously implanted Valsalva graft. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22 (02) 241-242
• 23 Ko SF, Hsieh MJ, Chen MC. , et al. Effects of heart rate on motion artifacts of the aorta on non-ECG-assisted 0.5-sec thoracic MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184 (04) 1225-1230
• 24 Roos JE, Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR. Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2002; 222 (01) 271-277
• 25 von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Etz CD. , et al. Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 31 (01) 163-169
• 26 Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Von Aspern K. , et al. Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing?. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 29 (03) 693-703
• 27 Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Haensig M. , et al. Role of preprocedural computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. RoFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 2013; 185 (10) 941-949
• 28 Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G. , et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59 (14) 1275-1286
• 29 Morgan-Hughes GJ, Owens PE, Marshall AJ, Roobottom CA. Thoracic aorta at multi-detector row CT: motion artifact with various reconstruction windows. Radiology 2003; 228 (02) 583-588
• 30 Dapunt OE, de Asla RA, Griepp EB, Midulla PS, Griepp RB. Computer-generated 3D representations of the aorta: a new tool in the management of aortic aneurysm patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 42 (01) 25-28
• 31 Osserman R. The isoperimetric inequality. Bull Am Math Soc 1978; 84 (06) 1182-1238