Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2017; 34(11): 1058-1064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603653
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Ultrasonographic Change in Uterocervical Angle is not a Risk Factor for Preterm Birth in Women with a Short Cervix

Tara A. Lynch
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Kam Szlachetka
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Neil S. Seligman
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 April 2017

28 April 2017

Publication Date:
05 June 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To determine if change in uterocervical angle (UCA) is associated with an increased rate of preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) for women with a short cervix.

Study Design A retrospective study was performed from January 2013 to March 2016 of singleton pregnancies undergoing universal cervical length screening. The difference between the UCA for the first cervical length ≤ 2.5 cm and last recorded cervical length < 25 weeks was defined as the change in UCA. The primary outcome was the rate of preterm birth at < 37 weeks of gestation.

Results A total of 176 women met the inclusion criteria. There was no difference in the rate of preterm birth at < 34 weeks (23.3 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.27) or at < 37 weeks (34.9 vs. 37.8%, p = 0.69) based on a change in UCA (i.e., decreased/no change or increased UCA). However, women with a final UCA ≥105 degrees had an increased risk of preterm birth at less than 34 weeks (24.2 vs. 6.8%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion A change in UCA was not associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Instead, a final absolute UCA ≥ 105 degrees measured < 25 weeks was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth at < 34 weeks of gestation for women with a short cervix ≤ 2.5 cm.

Keywords

preterm birth - short cervix - ultrasound - uterocervical angle

Note

These findings were presented at the 37th Annual Pregnancy Meeting, Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, from January 23 to 28, 2017.


 

  • References

  • 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ. Births in the United States, 2015. NCHS Data Brief 2016; (258) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Callaghan WM, MacDorman MF, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Barfield WD. Explaining the recent decrease in US infant mortality rate, 2007-2013. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (01) 73.e1-73.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Suhag A, Berghella V. Short cervical length dilemma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015; 42 (02) 241-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Berghella V, Saccone G. Fetal fibronectin testing for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (04) 431-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Beta J, Akolekar R, Ventura W, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from maternal factors, obstetric history and placental perfusion and function at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31 (01) 75-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dziadosz M, Bennett TA, Dolin C. , et al. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (03) 376.e1-376.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V. , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 2001; 286 (11) 1340-1348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH. ; Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (05) 462-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Foundation PQ. . Cervical Length Education and Review (CLEAR). 2016 . Available at: https://clear.perinatalquality.org/
    PubMed
  • 10 Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24 (05) 538-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cannie MM, Dobrescu O, Gucciardo L. , et al. Arabin cervical pessary in women at high risk of preterm birth: a magnetic resonance imaging observational follow-up study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42 (04) 426-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Knight JC, Tenbrink E, Sheng J, Patil AS. Anterior uterocervical angle measurement improves prediction of cerclage failure. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (04) 375-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (06) 789-801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ. , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334 (09) 567-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D. , et al; PREGNANT Trial. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38 (01) 18-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Iams JD. Identification of candidates for progesterone: why, who, how, and when?. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (06) 1317-1326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar