Anterior Extension of Tumor is as Important as Tumor Size to Facial Nerve Outcome and Extent of Resection for Vestibular Schwannomas

Abstract

Objectives We examined vestibular schwannoma tumor dimension and direction of growth to determine whether these correlate with facial nerve outcome as well as extent of resection (EOR).

Design Retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases.

Participants 206 patients were a part of this study.

Main Outcome Measures Tumor dimensions were measured using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and a series of ratios were then calculated to further characterize tumor dimension. Regression analyses were performed to investigate correlation with facial nerve outcome and EOR.

Results Patients with tumor extending >1.5 cm anterior to the internal auditory canal (IAC) (AB measurement) were three times more likely to have postoperative House-Brackman grades of 3 or worse. We also found that an EB/BF ratio (representing elongated growth parallel to the IAC axis) ≥1.1 was associated with half the risk of poor facial nerve outcome. Tumors with anterior-posterior diameter (AC measurement) >1.9 cm were five times less likely to undergo gross total resection (GTR). Furthermore, an increased degree of tumor extension into the IAC (DE measurement >2.4 cm) or an increased amount of brainstem compression (EB measurement >1.1 cm) were each associated with a nearly 3-fold decrease in the likelihood of GTR.

Conclusion Our study demonstrates that anterior extent of the tumor is as important as tumor size to facial nerve outcome and degree of resection for vestibular schwannomas.

Keywords

acoustic neuroma - anterior extension - facial nerve outcome - tumor dimension - vestibular schwannoma

• References

• 1 Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (03) E14
• 2 Bloch O, Sughrue ME, Kaur R. , et al. Factors associated with preservation of facial nerve function after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. J Neurooncol 2011; 102 (02) 281-286
• 3 Chen Z, Prasad SC, Di Lella F. , et al. The behavior of residual tumors and facial nerve outcomes after incomplete excision of vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (06) 1278-1287
• 4 Copeland WR, Hoover JM, Morris JM, Driscoll CL, Link MJ. Use of preoperative MRI to predict vestibular schwannoma intraoperative consistency and facial nerve outcome. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74 (06) 347-350
• 5 Sameshima T, Morita A, Tanikawa R. , et al. Evaluation of variation in the course of the facial nerve, nerve adhesion to tumors, and postoperative facial palsy in acoustic neuroma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74 (01) 39-43
• 6 Grey PL, Moffat DA, Palmer CR, Hardy DG, Baguley DM. Factors which influence the facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996; 21 (05) 409-413
• 7 Gerganov VM, Giordano M, Samii M, Samii A. Diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking for prediction of the position of the facial nerve in relation to large vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (06) 1087-1093
• 8 Taoka T, Hirabayashi H, Nakagawa H. , et al. Displacement of the facial nerve course by vestibular schwannoma: preoperative visualization using diffusion tensor tractography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24 (05) 1005-1010
• 9 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93 (02) 146-147
• 10 Carlson ML, Van Abel KM, Driscoll CL. , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging surveillance following vestibular schwannoma resection. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (02) 378-388
• 11 Jacob JT, Carlson ML, Driscoll CL, Link MJ. Volumetric analysis of tumor control following subtotal and near-total resection of vestibular schwannoma. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (08) 1877-1882
• 12 Gerganov VM, Klinge PM, Nouri M, Stieglitz L, Samii M, Samii A. Prognostic clinical and radiological parameters for immediate facial nerve function following vestibular schwannoma surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151 (06) 581-587 , discussion 587
• 13 Sharma M, Sonig A, Ambekar S, Nanda A. Radiological and Clinical Factors Predicting the Facial Nerve Outcome following Retrosigmoid Approach for Large Vestibular Schwannomas (VSs). J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74 (05) 317-323
• 14 Ryzenman JM, Pensak ML, Tew Jr JM. Facial paralysis and surgical rehabilitation: a quality of life analysis in a cohort of 1,595 patients after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26 (03) 516-521 , discussion 521
• 15 Ruth HR, Luetje CM, Whittaker CK. Acoustic tumors: preoperative measurement and correlation with postoperative facial nerve function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93 (02) 160-163
• 16 Symon L, Bordi LT, Compton JS, Sabin IH, Sayin E. Acoustic neuroma: a review of 392 cases. Br J Neurosurg 1989; 3 (03) 343-347
• 17 Lee TK, Lund WS, Adams CB. Factors influencing the preservation of the facial nerve during acoustic surgery. Br J Neurosurg 1990; 4 (01) 5-8
• 18 Hardy DG, Macfarlane R, Baguley D, Moffat DA. Surgery for acoustic neurinoma. An analysis of 100 translabyrinthine operations. J Neurosurg 1989; 71 (06) 799-804
• 19 Sterkers JM, Morrison GA, Sterkers O, El-Dine MM. Preservation of facial, cochlear, and other nerve functions in acoustic neuroma treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 110 (02) 146-155
• 20 Sampath P, Holliday MJ, Brem H, Niparko JK, Long DM. Facial nerve injury in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery: etiology and prevention. J Neurosurg 1997; 87 (01) 60-66
• 21 Brackmann DE, Cullen RD, Fisher LM. Facial nerve function after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136 (05) 773-777
• 22 Falcioni M, Fois P, Taibah A, Sanna M. Facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (04) 820-826