Semin Hear 2017; 38(04): 348-358
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606328
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Understanding Why People Enjoy Loud Sound

David Welch
1   Audiology Department, Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
,
Guy Fremaux
2   Triton Hearing, New Zealand
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 October 2017 (online)

Abstract

Sounds at levels that can injure the ear are regarded as enjoyable by many people. In many societies, a common form of this behavior is listening to loud music, either via personal audio systems or at music venues. Drawing on theory from the literature around loud sound and emotional responses to music, and combining it with concepts of physiological sound adaptation and classical conditioning, we developed a model of the process that may underlie people's enjoyment of loud sound, particularly loud music in nightclubs. The Conditioning, Adaptation, and Acculturation to Loud Music (CAALM) model proposes that the benefits associated with loud sound, alongside other desirable aspects of nightclubs, provide the unconditioned stimuli. Over time regular clubbers become conditioned to enjoy loud sound in itself. Exposure to loud sound also causes adaptation within the auditory system, so there is both a desire for, and tolerance of, loud sound during leisure time. This sets up an expectation of loud music as a cultural norm, and staff of leisure venues, who are themselves part of that culture, set music levels to meet customer expectations; and a cycle is perpetuated. This theory may be a useful consideration for health promotion and hearing conservation interventions.

 
  • References

  • 1 Torre III P, Howell JC. Noise levels during aerobics and the potential effects on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Commun Disord 2008; 41 (06) 501-511
  • 2 Beach E, Williams W, Gilliver M. Estimating young Australian adults' risk of hearing damage from selected leisure activities. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (01) 75-82
  • 3 Williams W. Trends in listening to personal stereos. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (11) 784-788
  • 4 Opperman DA, Reifman W, Schlauch R, Levine S. Incidence of spontaneous hearing threshold shifts during modern concert performances. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134 (04) 667-673
  • 5 Vogel I, Brug J, van der Ploeg CPB, Raat H. Young people's exposure to loud music: a summary of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33 (02) 124-133
  • 6 Griest SE, Folmer RL, Martin WH. Effectiveness of “Dangerous Decibels,” a school-based hearing loss prevention program. Am J Audiol 2007; 16 (02) S165-S181
  • 7 Juslin PN, Västfjäll D. Emotional responses to music: the need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behav Brain Sci 2008; 31 (05) 559-575 , discussion 575–621
  • 8 Fettiplace R, Kim KX. The physiology of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in hearing. Physiol Rev 2014; 94 (03) 951-986
  • 9 Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 2006; 27 (01) 1-19
  • 10 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 2009; 29 (45) 14077-14085
  • 11 Ceriani F, Mammano F. Calcium signaling in the cochlea—molecular mechanisms and physiopathological implications. Cell Commun Signal 2012; 10 (01) 20
  • 12 Rutherford MA, Moser T. The ribbon synapse between type I spiral ganglion neurons and inner hair cells. In: Dabdoub A, Fritzsch B, Popper AN, Fay RR. , eds. Primary Auditory Neurons of the Mammalian Cochlea. Vol. 52. New York, NY: Springer; 2016: 117-156
  • 13 Whitmire CJ, Stanley GB. Rapid sensory adaptation redux: a circuit perspective. Neuron 2016; 92 (02) 298-315
  • 14 Beach EF, Gilliver M, Williams W. Leisure noise exposure: participation trends, symptoms of hearing damage, and perception of risk. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (Suppl. 01) S20-S25
  • 15 Williams W, Beach EF, Gilliver M. Clubbing: the cumulative effect of noise exposure from attendance at dance clubs and night clubs on whole-of-life noise exposure. Noise Health 2010; 12 (48) 155-158
  • 16 Rintelmann WF, Borus JF. Noise-induced hearing loss and rock and roll music. Arch Otolaryngol 1968; 88 (04) 377-385
  • 17 Blesser B. The seductive (yet destructive) appeal of loud music. Available at: www.blesser.net . Accessed August 23, 2017
  • 18 Todd NPM, Cody FW. Vestibular responses to loud dance music: a physiological basis of the “rock and roll threshold”?. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107 (01) 496-500
  • 19 Welch D, Fremaux G. Why do people like loud sound? A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14 (08) 908 . doi:10.3390/ijerph14080908
  • 20 Forsyth A, Cloonan M. Alco-pop? The use of popular music in Glasgow pubs. Pop Music Soc 2008; 31 (01) 57-78
  • 21 Forsyth AJM. “Lager, lager shouting”: the role of music and DJs in nightclub disorder control. Adicciones 2009; 21 (04) 327-345
  • 22 van de Goor LAM, Knibbe RA, Drop MJ. Adolescent drinking behavior: an observational study of the influence of situational factors on adolescent drinking rates. J Stud Alcohol 1990; 51 (06) 548-555
  • 23 Guéguen N, Jacob C, Le Guellec H, Morineau T, Lourel M. Sound level of environmental music and drinking behavior: a field experiment with beer drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2008; 32 (10) 1795-1798
  • 24 Guéguen N, Le Guellec H, Jacob C. Sound level of background music and alcohol consumption: an empirical evaluation. Percept Mot Skills 2004; 99 (01) 34-38
  • 25 Mercier V, Hohmann BW. Is electronically amplified music too loud? What do young people think?. Noise Health 2002; 4 (16) 47-55
  • 26 Gilles A, Thuy I, De Rycke E, Van de Heyning P. A little bit less would be great: adolescents' opinion towards music levels. Noise Health 2014; 16 (72) 285-291
  • 27 Johnson O, Andrew B, Walker D, Morgan S, Aldren A. British university students' attitudes towards noise-induced hearing loss caused by nightclub attendance. J Laryngol Otol 2014; 128 (01) 29-34 , quiz 33–34
  • 28 Mulder J. Average is the new loudest. Leonardo Music J 2016; 26: 56-59
  • 29 Siegel A, Sapru HN. Essential Neuroscience. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011
  • 30 Brown RE, Basheer R, McKenna JT, Strecker RE, McCarley RW. Control of sleep and wakefulness. Physiol Rev 2012; 92 (03) 1087-1187
  • 31 Koch M, Schnitzler HU. The acoustic startle response in rats—circuits mediating evocation, inhibition and potentiation. Behav Brain Res 1997; 89 (1–2): 35-49
  • 32 Gillmeister H, Eimer M. Tactile enhancement of auditory detection and perceived loudness. Brain Res 2007; 1160: 58-68
  • 33 Kellaris JJ, Mantel SP, Altsech MB. Decibels, disposition, and duration: the impact of musical loudness and internal states on time perceptions. Advances in Consumer Research 1996; (23) 498-503
  • 34 Schafer RM. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, NY: Destiny Books; 1977
  • 35 Axelsson Ö, Nilsson ME, Berglund B. A principal components model of soundscape perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128 (05) 2836-2846
  • 36 Andringa TC, Lanser JJL. How pleasant sounds promote and annoying sounds impede health: a cognitive approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10 (04) 1439-1461
  • 37 Watts GR, Pheasant RJ. Tranquillity in the Scottish Highlands and Dartmoor National Park—the importance of soundscapes and emotional factors. Appl Acoust 2015; 89: 297-305
  • 38 Brown AL, Kang JA, Gjestland T. Towards standardization in soundscape preference assessment. Appl Acoust 2011; 72 (06) 387-392
  • 39 Aiello LM, Schifanella R, Quercia D, Aletta F. Chatty maps: constructing sound maps of urban areas from social media data. R Soc Open Sci 2016; 3 (03) 150690
  • 40 Welch D, Shepherd D, Dirks K, Tan MY. Towards a quantitative tool to assess the soundscape. Paper presented at: INTERNOISE 2014—43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control; Melbourne, Australia, 16–19 November, 2014
  • 41 Brown AL. A review of progress in soundscapes and an approach to soundscape planning. Int J Acoust Vib 2012; 17 (02) 73-81
  • 42 Arnett J. Sensation seeking—a new conceptualization and a new scale. Pers Individ Dif 1994; 16 (02) 289-296
  • 43 Bull M. iPod: a personalized sound world for its consumers. e-LiS 2010; 17 (34) 55-63
  • 44 Clark WW. Noise exposure from leisure activities: a review. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (01) 175-181
  • 45 Widen SE, Erlandsson SI. Risk perception in musical settings—a qualitative study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2007; 2: 33-44
  • 46 Florentine M, Hunter W, Robinson M, Ballou M, Buus S. On the behavioral characteristics of loud-music listening. Ear Hear 1998; 19 (06) 420-428
  • 47 Arnett J. The soundtrack of recklessness. J Adolesc Res 1992; 7 (03) 313-331
  • 48 Stansfeld SA. Noise, noise sensitivity and psychiatric disorder: epidemiological and psychophysiological studies. Psychol Med 1992; (Suppl. 22) 1-44
  • 49 Siegel AW, Cousins JH, Rubovits DS, Parsons JT, Lavery B, Crowley CL. Adolescents' perceptions of the benefits and risks of their own risk-taking. J Emot Behav Disord 1994; 2 (02) 89-98
  • 50 Martin WH, Griest SE, Sobel JL, Howarth LC. Randomized trial of four noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus prevention interventions for children. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (Suppl. 01) S41-S49
  • 51 Weichbold V, Zorowka P. Effects of a hearing protection campaign on the discotheque attendance habits of high-school students. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 (08) 489-493
  • 52 Keppler H, Ingeborg D, Sofie D, Bart V. The effects of a hearing education program on recreational noise exposure, attitudes and beliefs toward noise, hearing loss, and hearing protector devices in young adults. Noise Health 2015; 17 (78) 253-262
  • 53 Welch D, Reddy R, Hand J, Devine IM. Educating teenagers about hearing health by training them to educate children. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (09) 499-506