Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(03): 250-256
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607315
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Resection of Parapharyngeal Space Tumors

Irit Duek
1   The Head and Neck Center, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
2   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
,
Gill E. Sviri
1   The Head and Neck Center, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
,
Salem Billan
1   The Head and Neck Center, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
4   Department of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
,
Ziv Gil
1   The Head and Neck Center, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
2   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 April 2017

10 September 2017

Publication Date:
13 October 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Surgical removal of parapharyngeal space tumors (PPST) poses challenges due to the complex anatomy of the region. PPSTs are routinely resected by a transcervical approach using blind finger dissection. Large PPSTs or those located high at the skull base, often require transmandibular or infratemporal fossa approaches, associated with considerable morbidity.

Objective Here, we describe an approach for PPST removal that comprises transcervical endoscopic, with or without transoral robotic technique.

Materials and Methods We retrospectively studied the demographic, clinical, surgical, and outcome data of 11 consecutive patients who underwent PPST excision between June 2013 and July 2017 at our center. Patients either underwent a transcervical endoscopic procedure (n = 4), a transoral robotic procedure (n = 2) or a combination of the two procedures (n = 5).

Results Complete tumor excision was achieved in all cases, with no intra-, peri-, or postoperative complications. Final histopathologic findings demonstrated pleomorphic adenoma for seven patients, cavernous hemangioma for one patient, and malignant tumors for three patients. The average tumor size was 44.22 ± 31.9 cm3 (range: 7.5–111 cm3). At follow-up (range: 3–42 months), there was no evidence of recurrence.

Conclusions The approach described provides improved visualization and safe vascular control with minimum tumor stress, preventing the need for blind finger dissection, and allowing complete tumor removal while minimizing tumor spillage, nerve injury, and blood loss, maintaining excellent cosmetic and functional results. This approach could be utilized for the removal of large benign PPST, or small PPST located high.

Keywords

parapharyngeal space - parapharyngeal space tumor - minimally invasive - transoral robotic surgery - da Vinci robot system
 

  • References

  • 1 Pensak ML, Gluckman JL, Shumrick KA. Parapharyngeal space tumors: an algorithm for evaluation and management. Laryngoscope 1994; 104 (09) 1170-1173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chang SS, Goldenberg D, Koch WM. Transcervical approach to benign parapharyngeal space tumors. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2012; 121 (09) 620-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boyce BJ, Curry JM, Luginbuhl A, Cognetti DM. Transoral robotic approach to parapharyngeal space tumors: Case series and technical limitations. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (08) 1776-1782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Benet A, Plata Bello J, El-Sayed I. Combined endonasal-transcervical approach to a metastatic parapharyngeal space papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cureus 2015; 7 (07) e285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Arshad H, Durmus K, Ozer E. Transoral robotic resection of selected parapharyngeal space tumors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270 (05) 1737-1740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Park YM, De Virgilio A, Kim WS, Chung HP, Kim SH. Parapharyngeal space surgery via a transoral approach using a robotic surgical system: transoral robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013; 23 (03) 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mendelsohn AH. Transoral robotic assisted resection of the parapharyngeal space. Head Neck 2015; 37 (02) 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 de Almeida JR, Genden EM. Robotic surgery for oropharynx cancer: promise, challenges, and future directions. Curr Oncol Rep 2012; 14 (02) 148-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ansarin M, Tagliabue M, Chu F, Zorzi S, Proh M, Preda L. Transoral robotic surgery in retrostyloid parapharyngeal space schwannomas. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2014; 2014: 296025
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chan JY, Tsang RK, Eisele DW, Richmon JD. Transoral robotic surgery of the parapharyngeal space: a case series and systematic review. Head Neck 2015; 37 (02) 293-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 O'Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS. Robotic skull base surgery: preclinical investigations to human clinical application. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (12) 1215-1219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cohen SM, Burkey BB, Netterville JL. Surgical management of parapharyngeal space masses. Head Neck 2005; 27 (08) 669-675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hughes III KV, Olsen KD, McCaffrey TV. Parapharyngeal space neoplasms. Head Neck 1995; 17 (02) 124-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 De Virgilio A, Park YM, Kim WS, Byeon HK, Lee SY, Kim SH. Transoral robotic surgery for the resection of parapharyngeal tumour: our experience in ten patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2012; 37 (06) 483-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Betka J, Chovanec M, Klozar J. , et al. Transoral and combined transoral-transcervical approach in the surgery of parapharyngeal tumors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (05) 765-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Khafif A, Segev Y, Kaplan DM, Gil Z, Fliss DM. Surgical management of parapharyngeal space tumors: a 10-year review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132 (03) 401-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar