Radiographic Morphology and Method for Localization of the Adductor Tubercle on Anterior–Posterior Knee Radiographs

Abstract

The adductor tubercle (AT) is a landmark for joint line identification in knee arthroplasty. Up to now, there has not been a dedicated study to define its morphology on an anterior–posterior (AP) radiograph. As a result, radiographic localization of the AT has been inconsistent and confusing. Ten bone specimens, each with the AT labeled with a metal marker, were radiographed to demonstrate the AT appearance on AP radiographs. Based on this knowledge, a method to locate the AT was developed. A total of 200 clinical radiographs were examined to further confirm the observed radiographic morphology with emphasis on the visibility of the AT and its association with the rotational status of the knee on radiographs. One hundred of them were used to test the reliability of this method of AT identification. Of the 200 ATs, 153 (76%) were clearly visible on radiographs as a faint pyramid-shaped shadow protruding outward from the inflexion point of the concave–convex silhouette over the femoral shaft-condylar junction, allowing direct identification. For invisible ATs (24%), this inflexion point was found to be a useful surrogate landmark for their identification. Locating the AT using this technique showed a good intra- and interobserver reliabilities. The proposed method may be valuable for the consistent use of this landmark in joint line identification on radiographs.

Keywords

joint line - adductor tubercle - knee arthroplasty

• References

• 1 Figgie III HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller III HS, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (07) 1035-1040
• 2 Martin JW, Whiteside LA. The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (259) 146-156
• 3 Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, White SE, Milliano MT. Influence of prosthetic joint line position on knee kinematics and patellar position. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6 (02) 169-177
• 4 Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367) 165-171
• 5 Robinson M, Eckhoff DG, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Bach JM. Variability of landmark identification in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 442 (442) 57-62
• 6 Jacofsky DJ, Della Valle CJ, Meneghini RM, Sporer SM, Cercek RM. ; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (05) 1282-1292
• 7 Hofmann AA, Kurtin SM, Lyons S, Tanner AM, Bolognesi MP. Clinical and radiographic analysis of accurate restoration of the joint line in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (08) 1154-1162
• 8 Iacono F, Lo Presti M, Bruni D. , et al. The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (12) 2725-2729
• 9 Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Bruni D. , et al. The adductor tubercle as an important landmark to determine the joint line level in total knee arthroplasty: from radiographs to surgical theatre. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (12) 3034-3038
• 10 Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Filardo G. , et al. The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (10) 3212-3217
• 11 Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Swan JD, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (09) 1223-1231
• 12 Maderbacher G, Keshmiri A, Zeman F, Grifka J, Baier C. Assessing joint line positions by means of the contralateral knee: a new approach for planning knee revision surgery?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (11) 3244-3250
• 13 Luyckx T, Beckers L, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Bellemans J. The adductor ratio: a new tool for joint line reconstruction in revision TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (12) 3028-3033
• 14 Sadaka C, Kabalan Z, Hoyek F, Abi Fares G, Lahoud JC. Joint line restoration during revision total knee arthroplasty: an accurate and reliable method. Springerplus 2015; 4: 736-740
• 15 Chen IH, Wu WT, Wang CC, Liu KL, Yeh KT, Peng CH. An unambiguous technique for locating the adductor tubercle and using it to identify the joint line. Knee 2016; 23 (06) 960-963
• 16 Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Engh GA, Clark CR, Lotke P, Saleh KJ. Radiographic prediction of intraoperative bone loss in knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 446 (446) 51-58
• 17 Bontrager KL, Lampignano J. . Textbook of Radiographic Positioning and Related Anatomy: New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013: 244-248
• 18 Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17 (01) 101-110
• 19 Standring S. The anatomical basis of clinical practice. In: Smith J. , ed. Gray's Anatomy, 40th ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2008
• 20 Henry D, Clarke W. Anatomy. In: Scott WN. , ed. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee, 5 ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2012: 2-45