Synlett 2019; 30(09): 1100-1104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1611537
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Triphenylphosphine Oxide-Catalyzed Selective α,β-Reduction of Conjugated Polyunsaturated Ketones

Xuanshu Xia
,
Zhiqi Lao
,
Department of Chemistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, P. R. of China   Email: phtoy@hku.hk
› Author Affiliations
This research was supported financially by the University of Hong Kong and the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong S. A. R., P. R. of China (Project No. 17305915).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 05 March 2019

Accepted after revision: 04 April 2019

Publication Date:
24 April 2019 (online)


Abstract

The scope of the triphenylphosphine oxide-catalyzed reduction of conjugated polyunsaturated ketones using trichlorosilane as the reducing reagent has been examined. In all cases studied, the α,β-C=C double bond was selectively reduced to a C–C single bond while all other reducible functional groups remained unchanged. This reaction was applied to a large variety of conjugated dienones, a trienone, and a tetraenone. Additionally, a tandem one-pot Wittig/conjugate-reduction reaction sequence was developed to produce γ,δ-unsaturated ketones directly from simple building blocks. In these reactions the byproduct of the Wittig reaction served as the catalyst for the reduction reaction. This strategy was then used in the synthesis of naturally occurring moth pheromones to demonstrate its utility in the context of natural-product synthesis.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Sugiura M, Sato N, Kotani S, Nakajima M. Chem. Commun. 2008; 4309
  • 2 Keinan E, Greenspoon N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986; 108: 7314
  • 3 Fujii M, Nakamura K, Yasui S, Oka S, Ohno A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1987; 60: 2423
  • 4 Kraft P, Ahlin JS. E, Büchel M, Sutter P. Synthesis 2012; 44: 2985
  • 5 Kraft P, Jordi S, Denizot N, Felker I. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 554
  • 6 Ranu BC, Samanta S. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 7130
  • 7 Chandrasekhar S, Chandrashekar G, Reddy MS, Srihari P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006; 4: 1650
  • 8 Li W, Wu X.-F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 331
  • 9 Gan K, Ng JS, Sadeer A, Pullarkat SA. Synlett 2016; 26: 254
  • 10 Silva EM. P, Silva AM. S. Synthesis 2012; 44: 3109
  • 11 See Supporting Information for details.
  • 12 For a review, see: Kwong, C. K.-W.; Fu, M. Y.; Sze-Lok Lam, C.; Toy, P. H. Synthesis 2008 40, 2307.
  • 14 Enones 3br (Table [1]); General Procedure A solution of the appropriate diene 2br (1.0 mmol) and Ph3P=O (1) (0.2 mmol) in anhyd CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was stirred under N2 and cooled to –78 °C. Cl3SiH (2.0 mmol) was added, and stirring was continued for 2 h more. The mixture was then allowed to warm to rt and the volatiles were removed under a stream of air. Sat. aq Na2CO3 (20 mL) and CH2Cl2 were added, and the resulting suspension was stirred for 30 min. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with additional CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by chromatography [silica gel, EtOAc–hexane (10:90)]. (4E)-1-(2-Naphthyl)hex-4-en-1-one (3b) Clear oil; yield: 213 mg (95%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.61 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 3 H), 2.41–2.46 (m, 2 H), 3.04 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 5.46–5.48 (m, 2 H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 8.57 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.9, 27.6, 41.9, 124.3, 125.8, 126.1, 126.6, 127.3, 127.7, 128.4, 129.6, 130.1, 132.3, 133.9, 136.1, 204.2. HRMS (El-MS): m/z calcd for C16H16O: 224.1201; found: 224.1190.
    • 15a Cao J.-J, Zhou F, Zhou J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 4976
    • 15b Chen L, Shi T.-D, Zhou J. Chem. Asian J. 2013; 8: 556
    • 15c Chen L, Du Y, Zeng X.-P, Shi T.-D, Zhou F, Zhou J. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 1557

      For other recent examples of the ‘use of a byproduct in a subsequent reaction’ concept, see:
    • 16a Zhu F, Xu P.-W, Zhou F, Want C.-H, Zhou J. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 972
    • 16b Zhou X.-P, Cao Z.-Y, Wang X, Chen L, Zhou F, Zhu F, Wang C.-H, Zhou J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 416
    • 16c Gao X.-T, Gan C.-C, Liu X.-Y, Zhou F, Wu H.-H, Zhou J. ACS Catal. 2017; 7: 8588
    • 16d Liu Y.-L, Yin X.-P, Zhou J. Chin. J. Chem. 2018; 36: 321
    • 16e Hu X.-S, Yu J.-S, Gong Y, Zhou J. J. Fluorine Chem. 2019; 219: 106
  • 17 Aryl Enones 3s–u; General Procedure A mixture of the appropriate aryl ketone 13ac (2.1 mmol), enone 14a or 14b (2.0 mmol), Ph3P (2.1 mmol), and DIPEA (3.0 mmol) in anhyd CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was stirred under N2 and refluxed. When the Wittig reaction was completed (TLC), the mixture was cooled to –78 °C and Cl3SiH (4.0 mmol was added. The mixture was stirred for 2 h more and then warmed to rt. After 2 h, the volatiles were removed under a stream of air. Sat. aq Na2CO3 (20 mL) and CH2Cl2 (20 mL) were added, and the resulting suspension was stirred for 30 min. The layers were separated and the aqueous later was extracted with additional CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by chromatography [silica gel, EtOAc–hexane (10:90)]. (5E)-6-Phenylhex-5-en-2-one (3s) Clear oil; yield: 237 mg (68%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.16 (s, 3 H), 2.46–2.51 (m, 2 H), 2.58–2.63 (m, 2 H), 6.19 (dt, J 1 = 15.8, J 2 = 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.40 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.16–7.21 (m, 1 H), 7.24–7.34 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 27.2, 30.2, 43.3, 126.1, 127.2, 128.6, 128.9, 130.9, 137.5, 208.2. HRMS (El-MS): m/z calcd for C12H14O: 174.1045; found: 174.1031.
    • 18a Tamaki Y, Honma K, Kawasaki K. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1977; 12: 60
    • 18b Wenkert E, Ferreira VF, Michelotti EL, Tingoli M. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 719
    • 18c Yamamoto I, Tanaka S, Fujimoto T, Ohta K. J. Org. Chem. 1989; 54: 747
  • 19 Lapointe G, Schlenk K, Renaud P. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 4774