J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(05): 419-426
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1612617
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Impact of Dural Resection on Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Encroachment or Erosion

Hedyeh Ziai
1   Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
,
Eugene Yu
2   Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Terence Fu
3   Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Nidal Muhanna
4   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
,
Eric Monteiro
4   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
,
Allan Vescan
4   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
,
Gelareh Zadeh
5   Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
,
Ian J. Witterick
4   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
,
David P. Goldstein
4   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
,
Fred Gentili
5   Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
,
John R. de Almeida
4   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 June 2017

13 November 2017

Publication Date:
29 December 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objectives (1) To determine the occult rate of dural invasion in patients with tumors extending to and/or eroding the bony anterior skull base but without evidence of dural invasion on preoperative imaging. (2) To determine the impact of dural resection and of skull base erosion on survival outcomes in this group of patients (without evidence of dural invasion upon preoperative imaging).

Study Design Retrospective study.

Setting Tertiary care academic center.

Participants Patients with sinonasal malignancies with anterior skull base encroachment/erosion without dural invasion on preoperative imaging treated surgically.

Main Outcome Measures (1) Histopathologic disease in the dura in patients who had dural resection and (2) Oncologic outcomes (5-year local recurrence, dural recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival) in patients with and without dural resection, and patients with and without skull base erosion.

Results Thirty-seven patients were included. The occult rate of dural invasion was 54%. Patients with dural resection had improved margin control versus those without dural resection (90% vs 56%, p = 0.02). Dural resection improved 5-year overall survival only in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma compared with bony skull base resection alone (100% vs 75%, p = 0.03). Patients with skull base erosion had reduced local control versus those without erosion (63% vs 93%, p = 0.047).

Conclusion This study suggests a substantial rate of occult dural invasion despite no overt imaging findings. Dural resection may be associated with improved margin control, but no oncologic benefit except for esthesioneuroblastomas, although treatment heterogeneity and small sample size may limit conclusions.

Note

This work was presented at the 26th Annual North American Skull Base Society Meeting in Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, February 14, 2016.


 
  • References

  • 1 Day TA, Beas RA, Schlosser RJ. , et al. Management of paranasal sinus malignancy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2005; 6 (01) 3-18
  • 2 Farag A, Rosen M, Evans J. Surgical techniques for sinonasal malignancies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2015; 26 (03) 403-412
  • 3 Turner JH, Reh DD. Incidence and survival in patients with sinonasal cancer: a historical analysis of population-based data. Head Neck 2012; 34 (06) 877-885
  • 4 Jimbo H, Kamata S, Miura K. , et al. Operative management of skull base malignant tumors arising from the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus: recent strategies used in 25 cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010; 50 (01) 20-26 , discussion 26
  • 5 Ganly I, Gross ND, Patel SG, Bilsky MH, Shah JP, Kraus DH. Outcome of craniofacial resection in patients 70 years of age and older. Head Neck 2007; 29 (02) 89-94
  • 6 Suárez C, Llorente JL, Fernández de León R, Cabanillas R, Suárez V, López A. [Anterior craniofacial resection: oncologic outcome and complications in a series of 111 cases]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2004; 55 (01) 27-33
  • 7 Patel SG, Singh B, Polluri A. , et al. Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors: report of an international collaborative study. Cancer 2003; 98 (06) 1179-1187
  • 8 Hanna E, DeMonte F, Ibrahim S, Roberts D, Levine N, Kupferman M. Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers with and without craniotomy: oncologic results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 135 (12) 1219-1224
  • 9 McIntyre JB, Perez C, Penta M, Tong L, Truelson J, Batra PS. Patterns of dural involvement in sinonasal tumors: prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic findings. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2 (04) 336-341
  • 10 Eisen MD, Yousem DM, Montone KT. , et al. Use of preoperative MR to predict dural, perineural, and venous sinus invasion of skull base tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17 (10) 1937-1945
  • 11 Ducic Y, Miles BA, Sabatini P. Extending the traditional resection limits of squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior skull base. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 137 (06) 899-905
  • 12 Ahmadi J, Hinton DR, Segall HD, Couldwell WT, Stanley RB. Dural invasion by craniofacial and calvarial neoplasms: MR imaging and histopathologic evaluation. Radiology 1993; 188 (03) 747-749
  • 13 Moiyadi AV, Pai P, Nair D, Pal P, Shetty P. Dural involvement in skull base tumors-accuracy of preoperative radiological evaluation and intraoperative assessment. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (02) 526-530
  • 14 Arana E, Martí-Bonmatí L, Ricart V, Pérez-Ebrí M. Dural enhancement with primary calvarial lesions. Neuroradiology 2004; 46 (11) 900-905
  • 15 Ahmadi J, Hinton DR, Segall HD, Couldwell WT. Surgical implications of magnetic resonance-enhanced dura. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (03) 370-377 , discussion 377
  • 16 Porceddu S, Martin J, Shanker G. , et al. Paranasal sinus tumors: Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute experience. Head Neck 2004; 26 (04) 322-330
  • 17 Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B. , et al. Craniofacial resection for malignant paranasal sinus tumors: Report of an International Collaborative Study. Head Neck 2005; 27 (07) 575-584
  • 18 Shah JP, Galicich JH. Craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of ethmoid and anterior skull base. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103 (09) 514-517
  • 19 Bentz BG, Bilsky MH, Shah JP, Kraus D. Anterior skull base surgery for malignant tumors: a multivariate analysis of 27 years of experience. Head Neck 2003; 25 (07) 515-520
  • 20 Upile T, Fisher C, Jerjes W. , et al. The uncertainty of the surgical margin in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2007; 43 (04) 321-326
  • 21 Arnold A, Ziglinas P, Ochs K. , et al. Therapy options and long-term results of sinonasal malignancies. Oral Oncol 2012; 48 (10) 1031-1037
  • 22 Dias FL, Sá GM, Kligerman J. , et al. Complications of anterior craniofacial resection. Head Neck 1999; 21 (01) 12-20
  • 23 Fukuda S, Sakai N, Kamata SE. , et al. Surgical results of skull base surgery for the treatment of head and neck malignancies involving skull base: multi-institutional studies on 143 cases in Japan. Auris Nasus Larynx 2001; 28 (Suppl): S71-S75
  • 24 Irish JC, Gullane PJ, Gentili F. , et al. Tumors of the skull base: outcome and survival analysis of 77 cases. Head Neck 1994; 16 (01) 3-10
  • 25 Kraus DH, Shah JP, Arbit E, Galicich JH, Strong EW. Complications of craniofacial resection for tumors involving the anterior skull base. Head Neck 1994; 16 (04) 307-312
  • 26 Levine PA, Debo RF, Meredith SD, Jane JA, Constable WC, Cantrell RW. Craniofacial resection at the University of Virginia (1976–1992): survival analysis. Head Neck 1994; 16 (06) 574-577
  • 27 Lund VJ, Howard DJ, Wei WI, Cheesman AD. Craniofacial resection for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses–a 17-year experience. Head Neck 1998; 20 (02) 97-105
  • 28 Gil Z, Fliss DM. Tumours of the Skull Base and Paranasal Sinuses. New Delhi: Springer India; 2012: 175
  • 29 Gil Z, Abergel A, Leider-Trejo L. , et al. A comprehensive algorithm for anterior skull base reconstruction after oncological resections. Skull Base 2007; 17 (01) 25-37
  • 30 Laedrach K, Lukes A, Raveh J. Reconstruction of skull base and fronto-orbital defects following tumor resection. Skull Base 2007; 17 (01) 59-72
  • 31 Nakagawa T, Kodama S, Kobayashi M. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal management of esthesioneuroblastoma: a retrospective multicenter study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017; 8146 (17) 30348-30356
  • 32 Nicolai P, Battaglia P, Bignami M. , et al. Endoscopic surgery for malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract and adjacent skull base: a 10-year experience. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22 (03) 308-316
  • 33 Fraser S, Gardner PA, Koutourousiou M. , et al. Risk factors associated with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. J Neurosurg 2017; 1-6 ; epub ahead of print
  • 34 Harbo G, Grau C, Bundgaard T. , et al. Cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. A clinico-pathological study of 277 patients. Acta Oncol 1997; 36 (01) 45-50
  • 35 Taghi A, Ali A, Clarke P. Craniofacial resection and its role in the management of sinonasal malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2012; 12 (09) 1169-1176
  • 36 Malouf GG, Casiraghi O, Deutsch E, Guigay J, Temam S, Bourhis J. Low- and high-grade esthesioneuroblastomas display a distinct natural history and outcome. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49 (06) 1324-1334