Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2007; 46(06): 694-699
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625430
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

A Pen-based Interface for Generating Graphical Reports of Findings in Cardiac Catheterization

Y. Mori
1   The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
T. Igarashi
1   The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
R. Haraguchi
2   National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
,
K. Nakazawa
2   National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives : This paper introduces a pen-based interface for the graphical reporting of findings in cardiac catheterization.

Methods : The user can interactively draw, erase, move, and deform coronary arteries as well as record stenoses on them. The location and degree of each stenosis is represented visually and the doctor can record various treatments such as bypasses and stents on the diagram. In addition, the system automatically extracts semantic information from the graphical representation and stores it in XML format. The system can also generate a table in the format specified by the American Heart Association.

Results : Our current implementation is a research prototype and is not yet being used in clinical practice. However, we have already demonstrated it to medical professionals and confirmed the following benefits.

Conclusions : This system is useful not only as a tool for efficiently generating reports of findings but also as an effective explanation tool for patients.

Keywords

User-computer interface - medical records - heart catheterization - coronary arteries - coronary artery bypass - coronary stenosis
 

  • References

  • 1. Matsumura T. Electronic Medical Record and Hospital Information System: Comprehensive Management of Patient Information. Japan Journal of Medical Informatics 2001; 21 (03) 211-222 (in Japanese).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Matsumura Y. Current Status of Electronic Medical Record and its Tasks. Medical Frontline 2003; 58 (08) 46-51 (in Japanese).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Sitting DF, Kuperman GJ, Fiskio J. Evaluating Physician Satisfaction Regarding User Interactions with an Electronic Medical Record System. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium 1999; 99 (400) 404.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Ginsburg M. Pediatric Electronic Health Record Interface Design: The PedOne System. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2007: 139.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Nakazawa K, Igarashi T. A Comprehensive Computer Interface for the Spreading of Electronic Medical Recording Systems Supporting Hand writing Inputs by Pen Device. New Medicine in Japan 2003; 345: 74-77 (in Japanese).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Nakazawa K, Haraguchi R, Yao T, Nagata S, Sugimoto Y, Ashihara T, Takada M, Namikawa H, Okada Y, Yoshimoto K, Furuya N, Senda S, Uematsu Y, Igarashi T. Pen-based Interface for Electronic Medical Record System with Advanced Recognition and Search Engine for the Hand-written Characters. Japan Journal of Medical Informatics 2005; 25 (02) 81-86 (in Japanese).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Igarashi T. Free form User Interfaces for Graphical Computing. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Smart Graphics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; July 2-4, 2003: 39-48.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Sakabe N, Arai K, Abe K, Inoue H, Sakai S, Watanabe Y. A Survey of Demerits of Electronic Medical Record in the Ear, Nose and Throat Department. Japan Journal of Medical Informatics 2001; 21 (01) 131-136 (in Japanese).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB. A Reporting System on Patients Evaluated for Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 1975; 51 (Suppl. 04) 5-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Igarashi T, Moscovich T, Hughes JF. As-Rigid-as-Possible Shape Manipulation. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics 2005; 24 (03) 1134-1141.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar