Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2007; 46(01): V-VI
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628142
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Schattauer GmbH

Comparing the Implementation of CPOE in two Dutch Hospitals Revisited

A. J. ten Hoopen
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen – Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen The Netherlands
,
P. E. Zanstra
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen – Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen The Netherlands
,
P. F. de Vries Robbé
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen – Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • References

  • 1 Aarts J, Berg M. Same systems, different outcomes – comparing the implementation of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 53-61.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Demeester M. Cultural aspects of information technology implementation. Int J Med Inform 1999; 56 1-3 25-41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (Suppl. 03) 207-16.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brender J, Ammenwerth E, Nykanen P, Talmon J. Factors influencing success and failure of health informatics systems – a pilot Delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 125-36.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar