Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1987; 26(03): 99-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635495
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Dutch Respelling Rules for English and German Medical Word Lists

Holländische Umbuchstabierungsregeln für Wortlisten englischer und deutscher medizinischer Termini
G. J. A. Offerhaus
1   Research Fellow of the Queen Wilhelmina Fund - Netherlands Cancer Research Foundation.
,
A. C. Tersmette
2   (From the Department of Pathology, The Welch Medical Library, and the Milton S. Eisenhower Library of The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.)
,
G. W. Moore
2   (From the Department of Pathology, The Welch Medical Library, and the Milton S. Eisenhower Library of The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.)
,
Johanna Hershey
2   (From the Department of Pathology, The Welch Medical Library, and the Milton S. Eisenhower Library of The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.)
,
R. A. Polacsek
2   (From the Department of Pathology, The Welch Medical Library, and the Milton S. Eisenhower Library of The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Computer translation programs for foreign language texts have recently become available commercially and in the public domain, but large medical lexicons for these programs are not readily available. It has been shown that many English words can be “respelled” to form their corresponding translations in other Western European languages. We have used lists of 139,451 English and 185,137 German medical terms to generate respeliings in the Dutch language. The English list yielded 39,035 Dutch respeliings, and the German list yielded 56,683 respeliings. Medical respelling rules can substantially lower the effort of installing and maintaining a medically oriented computer translation program.

Computerübersetzungsprogramme für fremdsprachige Texte sind seit kurzem kommerziell und über die öffentliche Hand erhältlich. Umfangreiche medizinische Lexika sind jedoch für diese Programme noch nicht leicht zugänglich. Es wird gezeigt, daß viele englische Wörter “umbuchstabiert” werden können, um ihre entsprechende Übersetzung in andere westeuropäische Sprachen zu ermöglichen. Wir haben Listen von 139451 englischen und 185137 deutschen medizinischen Termini verwendet, um Umbuchstabierungen in die holländische Sprache zu erzeugen. Die englische Liste ergab 39035 entsprechende holländische Termini, die deutsche Liste 56683. Medizinische Umbuchstabierungsregeln können den Aufwand für die Installierung und Instandhaltung eines medizinisch orientierten Computerübersetzungsprogramms erheblich verringern.

Key-Words

Respelling Rules - Word Segmentation - Computer Translation Program - Dutch Language - English Language - German Language

Schlüssel-Wörter

Umbuchstabierungsregeln - Wortsegmentierung - Computerübersetzungsprogramm - holländische Sprache - englische Sprache - deutsche Sprache
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Adler C. R. Knochenkrankheiten. Diagnostik makroskopischer, histologischer und radiologischer Strukturveränderungen des Skeletts. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bar-Hillel B. Language and Information. Selected Essays on Their Theory and Application. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Inc; 1964
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Garcia-Hidalgo I, Dunham G. An experiment in English-Spanish automated translation of medical language data. Meth. Inform. Med 1981; 20: 38-46.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Language and Machines. Computers in Translation and Linguistics. Publication 1416 (A report by the Automatic Language Processing Advisory Committee, Division of Behavioral Sciences, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1966
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Locke W. N, Booth A. D. (Eds) Historical Introduction. In: Machine Translation of Languages. New York: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons; 1955
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Medical Subject Headings – Annotated Alphabetic List, 1986 Medical Subject Heading Section, Library Operations. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Moore G. W, Boitnott J. K, Miller R. E, Eggleston J. C, Hutchins G. M. Integrated anatomic pathology reporting system using natural language diagnoses. (Abstract). Lab. Invest 1987; 56: 53A
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moore G. W, Hutchins G. M, Miller R. E. Strategies for searching medical natural anatomical diagnoses of 7000 au-topsied patients. Amer. J. Pathol 1984; 115: 36-41.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Moore G. W, Polacsek R. A, Casanova M. E, Erozan Y. S, Hershey J, Miller R. E, Hutchins G. M. Multilingual Respelling Rules for an English Medical Word List. In Salamon R, Blum B, Jorgensen M. (Eds.) MEDINFO-86. North Holland/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V; 1986: 1106-1100.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Moore G. W, Riede U. N, Polacsek R. A, Miller R. E, Hutchins G. M. Automated translation of German to English medical text. Amer. J. Med 1986; 81: 103-111.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moore G. W, Riede U. N, Polacsek R. A, Miller R. E, Hutchins G. M. Group theory approach to computer translation of medical German. Meth. Inform. Med 1986; 25: 176-182.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nagao M, Tsujii J, Nakamura J. The Japanese Government project for machine translation. Comput. Linguist 1985; 11: 91-110.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Norton L. M, Pacak M. G. Morphose-mantic Analysis of Compound Word Forms in Medical Language. Meth. Inform. Med 1983; 22: 29-36.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pacak M, Cousineau L, White W. The segmentation approach to dictionary construction. J. clin. Comput 1972; 2: 37-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pacak M. G, Norton L. M, Dunham G. S. Morphosemantic Analysis of -ITIS Forms in Medical Language. Meth. Inform. Med 1980; 19: 99-105.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pacak M. G, Pratt A. W. Identification and Transformation of Terminal Morphemes in Medical English, Part II. Meth. Inform. Med 1978; 17: 95-100.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pearson W. R. Programming languages III. M. D. Computing 1985; 2: 45-56.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pratt A. W, Pacak M. Identification and Transformation of Terminal Morphemes in Medical English. Meth. Inform. Med 1969; 8: 84-90.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Slocum J. A survey of machine translation: Its history, current status, and future prospects. Comput. Linguist 1985; 11: 1-17.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Handleiding Koderen en Mini-Thesaurus. Amsterdam: Stichting PALGA,; 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Tucker Jr. A. B. A perspective on machine translation: Theory and practice. Commun. ACM 1984; 27: 322-329.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vasconcellos M, Leon M. SPANAM and ENGSPAN: Machine translation at ‘ the Pan American Health Organization. Comput: Linguist 1985; 11: 122-136.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Watanabe T, Ohsawa T, Suzuki T. A simple database language for personal computers. Commun. ACM 1983; 26: 646-653.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wingert F. Morphologic analysis of compound words. Meth. Inform. Med 1985; 24: 155-162.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wingert F. Medical Informatics. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Wingert F. Automated Indexing Based on SNOMED. Meth. Inform. Med 1985; 24: 27-34.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wingert F. SNOMED. Systematisierte Nomenklatur der Medizin. Band 1: Numerischer Index. Band 2: Alphabetischer Index. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1984
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Wolff S. The use of morphosemantic regularities in the medical vocabulary for automatic lexical coding. Meth. Inform. Med 1984; 23: 195-203.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar