Thromb Haemost 2018; 118(05): 808-817
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1639585
Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Risk Factors for Higher-than-Expected Residual Rivaroxaban Plasma Concentrations in Real-Life Patients

Alexander Kaserer*
1   Institute of Anaesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Andreas Schedler*
1   Institute of Anaesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Alexander Jetter
2   Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Burkhardt Seifert
3   Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Donat R. Spahn
1   Institute of Anaesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Philipp Stein
1   Institute of Anaesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Jan-Dirk Studt
4   Division of Haematology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

18 November 2017

09 February 2018

Publication Date:
03 April 2018 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Rivaroxaban (RXA) is a direct oral factor Xa (Xa) antagonist with a short half-life and a fast onset and offset of effect. Before elective surgery, discontinuation is recommended with an interval of at least > 24 hours. In clinical practice, this is, however, not always sufficient to achieve a residual RXA plasma concentration deemed appropriate for surgery, defined as ≤ 50 mcg/L. Our study aimed at identifying factors associated with a higher-than-expected residual RXA plasma concentration in a large group of real-life patients.

Materials and Methods This retrospective single-centre study included all patients taking RXA between 2012 and 2016 where RXA plasma concentration was determined by pharmacodynamic anti-Xa assay (518 measurements in 368 patients). Medical records were reviewed. Residual RXA plasma concentrations were then compared with expected values according to a pharmacokinetic model.

Results Residual RXA plasma concentration was significantly higher-than-expected in patients with atrial fibrillation, impaired kidney function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 mL/min), CYP3A4-, CYP2J2- and PGP-inhibitory co-medication including amiodarone. Impaired kidney function (odds ratio [OR], 2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–3.78, p = 0.003) and concomitant amiodarone intake (OR, 1.97, 95% CI, 1.04–3.72, p = 0.036) were significantly associated with RXA plasma concentrations > 50 mcg/L at 24 to 48 hours after the last RXA intake.

Conclusion In our group of real-life patients, impaired kidney function (GFR < 60 mL/min) and co-medication with amiodarone were independently associated with higher-than-expected residual RXA plasma concentrations. In these patients, standard intervals of RXA discontinuation may not always be sufficient before elective surgery and routine pre-operative determination of the residual RXA concentration could be advisable.

Authors' Contributions

A.K. planned the study, contributed to data collection, data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. A.S. acquired the data, contributed to data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. A.K. and A.S. contributed equally to this manuscript. P.S. contributed to statistical analyses, data interpretation and corrected the manuscript. A.J. contributed to study planning, data interpretation and corrected the manuscript. B.S. analysed the data and contributed to data interpretation. D.S. planned the study, contributed to data interpretation and corrected the manuscript. J.S. contributed to study planning, data acquisition, data interpretation, writing and review of the manuscript.


Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the local ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission Zurich, Switzerland, KEK-ZH-No: 2017–00164).


* These authors contributed equally to this article.


 
  • References

  • 1 Product information Xarelto®. Available at: Swissmedicinfo.ch. Accessed October 1, 2017
  • 2 Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Davidson BL. , et al; RECORD4 Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): a randomised trial. Lancet 2009; 373 (9676): 1673-1680
  • 3 Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M. , et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin-K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. Eur Heart J 2017; 38 (27) 2137-2149
  • 4 Godier A, Martin AC, Leblanc I. , et al. Peri-procedural management of dabigatran and rivaroxaban: duration of anticoagulant discontinuation and drug concentrations. Thromb Res 2015; 136 (04) 763-768
  • 5 Gong IY, Kim RB. Importance of pharmacokinetic profile and variability as determinants of dose and response to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Can J Cardiol 2013; 29 (7, Suppl): S24-S33
  • 6 Kubitza D, Becka M, Mueck W. , et al. Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 70 (05) 703-712
  • 7 Kubitza D, Becka M, Roth A, Mueck W. The influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 53 (03) 249-255
  • 8 Kubitza D, Becka M, Zuehlsdorf M, Mueck W. Body weight has limited influence on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 47 (02) 218-226
  • 9 Kubitza D, Roth A, Becka M. , et al. Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 76 (01) 89-98
  • 10 Mueck W, Kubitza D, Becka M. Co-administration of rivaroxaban with drugs that share its elimination pathways: pharmacokinetic effects in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 76 (03) 455-466
  • 11 Studt JD, Alberio L, Angelillo-Scherrer A. , et al. Accuracy and consistency of anti-Xa activity measurement for determination of rivaroxaban plasma levels. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (08) 1576-1583
  • 12 Mueck W, Stampfuss J, Kubitza D, Becka M. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of rivaroxaban. Clin Pharmacokinet 2014; 53 (01) 1-16
  • 13 Mueck W, Becka M, Kubitza D, Voith B, Zuehlsdorf M. Population model of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban--an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor--in healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007; 45 (06) 335-344
  • 14 van Es N, Coppens M, Schulman S, Middeldorp S, Büller HR. Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials. Blood 2014; 124 (12) 1968-1975
  • 15 Asmis LM, Alberio L, Angelillo-Scherrer A. , et al. Rivaroxaban: quantification by anti-FXa assay and influence on coagulation tests: a study in 9 Swiss laboratories. Thromb Res 2012; 129 (04) 492-498
  • 16 Kreutz R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban--an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2014; 9 (01) 75-83
  • 17 Mueck W, Lensing AW, Agnelli G, Decousus H, Prandoni P, Misselwitz F. Rivaroxaban: population pharmacokinetic analyses in patients treated for acute deep-vein thrombosis and exposure simulations in patients with atrial fibrillation treated for stroke prevention. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011; 50 (10) 675-686
  • 18 Tanigawa T, Kaneko M, Hashizume K. , et al. Model-based dose selection for phase III rivaroxaban study in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2013; 28 (01) 59-70
  • 19 Godier A, Dincq AS, Martin AC. , et al. Predictors of pre-procedural concentrations of direct oral anticoagulants: a prospective multicentre study. Eur Heart J 2017; 38 (31) 2431-2439
  • 20 Chang SH, Chou IJ, Yeh YH. , et al. Association between use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants with and without concurrent medications and risk of major bleeding in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA 2017; 318 (13) 1250-1259
  • 21 Steinberg BA, Hellkamp AS, Lokhnygina Y. , et al; ROCKET AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Use and outcomes of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulation: results from the ROCKET AF trial. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11 (06) 925-932