Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2018; 35(13): 1287-1296
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649481
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Severe Maternal Morbidity and Hospital Cost among Hospitalized Deliveries in the United States

Han-Yang Chen
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Suneet P. Chauhan
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Sean C. Blackwell
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

05 September 2017

28 March 2018

Publication Date:
03 May 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the contemporary national rate of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and its associated hospital cost during delivery hospitalization.

Study Design We conducted a retrospective study identifying all delivery hospitalizations in the United States between 2011 and 2012. We used data from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The delivery hospitalizations with SMM were identified by having at least one of the 25 previously established list of diagnosis and procedure codes. Aggregate and mean hospital costs were estimated. A generalized linear regression model was used to examine the association between SMM and hospital costs.

Results Of 7,438,946 delivery hospitalizations identified, the rate of SMM was 154 per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations. Without any SMM, the mean hospital cost was $4,300 and with any SMM, the mean hospital cost was $11,000. After adjustment, comparing to those without any SMM, the mean cost of delivery hospitalizations with any SMM was 2.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.1–2.2) times higher, and this ratio increases from 1.7-fold in those with only one SMM to 10.3-fold in those with five or more concurrent SMM.

Conclusion The hospital cost with any SMM was 2.1 times higher than those without any SMM. Our findings highlight the need to identify interventions and guide research efforts to mitigate the rate of SMM and its economic burden.

Keywords

administrative data - childbirth - hospital cost - severe maternal morbidity

Note

The abstract of this article was presented in the Oral Session at the 2016 Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Annual Meeting.


 

  • References

  • 1 Callaghan WM, Grobman WA, Kilpatrick SJ, Main EK, DʼAlton M. Facility-based identification of women with severe maternal morbidity: it is time to start. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 978-981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC. ; WHO Working Group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss--towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 23 (03) 287-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Callaghan WM, Mackay AP, Berg CJ. Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1991-2003. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (02) 133.e1-133.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Callaghan WM, Creanga AA, Kuklina EV. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (05) 1029-1036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kuklina EV, Meikle SF, Jamieson DJ. , et al. Severe obstetric morbidity in the United States: 1998-2005. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2, Pt 1): 293-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Ko JY. , et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now?. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014; 23 (01) 3-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2011. National Vital Statistics Reports; Vol 62, No. 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Hall MF, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National Health Statistics Reports; No. 29. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Podulka J, Stranges E, Steiner C. Hospitalizations Related to Childbirth, 2008. HCUP Statistical Brief #110. April 2011. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb110.pdf . Accessed May 5, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Severe Maternal Morbidity in New York City, 2008–2012. New York, NY; 2016 . Available at: https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/data/maternal-morbidity-report-08-12.pdf . Accessed May 5, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Databases. December 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp . Accessed May 5, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 HCUP NIS Trend Weights. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). May 2015. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/trendwghts.jsp . Accessed May 5, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kuklina EV, Whiteman MK, Hillis SD. , et al. An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity. Matern Child Health J 2008; 12 (04) 469-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe Maternal Morbidity in the United States. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/MaternalInfantHealth/ SevereMaternalMorbidity.html . Accessed May 5, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tompkins CP, Altman SH, Eilat E. The precarious pricing system for hospital services. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006; 25 (01) 45-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96 (01) 102-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cost-to-Charge Ratio Files. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). November 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge.jsp . Accessed May 5, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/ . Accessed January 15, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. Am Econ Rev 1970; 60 (03) 364-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mihaylova B, Briggs A, O'Hagan A, Thompson SG. Review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare resources and costs. Health Econ 2011; 20 (08) 897-916
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sabbatini AK, Kocher KE, Basu A, Hsia RY. In-hospital outcomes and costs among patients hospitalized during a return visit to the emergency department. JAMA 2016; 315 (07) 663-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Bishu KG, Fonarow GC, Egede LE. Trends in health care expenditure among US adults with heart failure: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2002-2011. Am Heart J 2017; 186: 63-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bui AL, Dieleman JL, Hamavid H. , et al. Spending on children's personal health care in the United States, 1996–2013. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (02) 181-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dodd S, Bassi A, Bodger K, Williamson P. A comparison of multivariable regression models to analyse cost data. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12 (01) 76-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Desai PR, Lawson KA, Barner JC, Rascati KL. Identifying patient characteristics associated with high schizophrenia-related direct medical costs in community-dwelling patients. J Manag Care Pharm 2013; 19 (06) 468-477
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Williams JS, Bishu K, Dismuke CE, Egede LE. Sex differences in healthcare expenditures among adults with diabetes: evidence from the medical expenditure panel survey, 2002-2011. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17 (01) 259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Malehi AS, Pourmotahari F, Angali KA. Statistical models for the analysis of skewed healthcare cost data: a simulation study. Health Econ Rev 2015; 5: 11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Berg CJ, Mackay AP, Qin C, Callaghan WM. Overview of maternal morbidity during hospitalization for labor and delivery in the United States: 1993-1997 and 2001-2005. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (05) 1075-1081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kilpatrick SJ, Berg C, Bernstein P. , et al. Standardized severe maternal morbidity review: rationale and process. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (2, Pt 1): 361-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Obstetric Care Consensus No. 5: Severe Maternal Morbidity: Screening and Review. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (03) e54-e60
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Press MJ, Rajkumar R, Conway PH. Medicare's new bundled payments: design, strategy, and evolution. JAMA 2016; 315 (02) 131-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. Accelerating and Aligning Clinical Episode Payment Models. Available at: http://hcp-lan.org/workproducts/cep-whitepaper-final.pdf . Accessed May 2, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Main EK, Cape V, Abreo A. , et al. Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (03) 298.e1-298.e11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Main EK, Abreo A, McNulty J. , et al. Measuring severe maternal morbidity: validation of potential measures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (05) 643.e1-643.e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119 (08) 844-850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar