Thromb Haemost 1995; 74(04): 1055-1058
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649881
Original Article
Clinical Studies
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

The Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer

Robert D Bona
The Departments of Medicine, Sections of Hematology-Oncology. St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center Hartford, CT, USA, and the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
,
Khalil Y Sivjee
The Departments of Medicine, Sections of Hematology-Oncology. St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center Hartford, CT, USA, and the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
,
Amy D Hickey
The Departments of Medicine, Sections of Hematology-Oncology. St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center Hartford, CT, USA, and the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
,
Donna M Wallace
The Departments of Medicine, Sections of Hematology-Oncology. St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center Hartford, CT, USA, and the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
,
Selby B Wajcs
The Departments of Medicine, Sections of Hematology-Oncology. St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center Hartford, CT, USA, and the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 21 February 1995

Accepted 06 June 1995

Publication Date:
09 July 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: To compare the complication rate (bleeding and thrombosis) of oral anticoagulation in a cohort of patients with cancer to a cohort without cancer

Design: Prospective cohort study

Setting: Outpatient anticoagulation clinic in a community hospital

Patients: Consecutive patients enrolled in an anticoagulation clinic: 44 with cancer, 64 without cancer

Interventions: Patients received prophylactic doses of Warfarin (target INR 2–3 in the majority of instances) and complication rates were assessed

Measurements: Major bleeding (strictly defined), minor bleeding, recurrent thrombosis, proportion of time with therapeutic INR, frequency of clinic visits

Results: The rates of major bleeding, minor bleeding, and recurrent thrombosis were not statistically significantly different in the two groups of patients. Therapeutic INR’s were more difficult to sustain in the cancer patients as compared to the non-cancer patients (43.3% vs 56.9%, p <0.0001). There was a non significant trend towards more frequent monitoring for the cancer patients compared with the noncancer patients (4.6 vs 3.5 visits per treatment month, p = 0.14)

Conclusions: Oral anticoagulation is safe and effective in the patient with cancer. It is more difficult to sustain a therapeutic INR in the cancer patients and they may need more frequent monitoring to achieve a low complication rate

 
  • References

  • 1 Hirsh J. Oral Anticoagulant Drugs. New Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1865-1875
  • 2 Landefeld C, Beyth R. Anticoagulant-related bleeding: Clinical Epidemiol ogy, Prediction, and Prevention. Am J Med 1993; 95: 315-328
  • 3 Landefeld C, Cook EF, Flatley M, Weisberg M, Goldman L. Identification and Preliminary Validation of Predictors of Major Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients Starting Anticoagulant Therapy. Am J Med 1987; 82: 703-713
  • 4 Landefeld C, Goldman L. Major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfar. In: Incidence and prediction by factors known at the start of outpatient therapy. Am J Med. 1989. 87 144-152
  • 5 Finh SD, McDonell M, Martin D. et al. Risk Factors for Complications of Chronic Anticoagulation. Ann Int Med 1993; 118: 511-520
  • 6 Gurwitz J, Goldberg R, Holden A, Knapic N, Ansell J. Age Related Risks of Long Term Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Arch Int Med 1988; 148: 1732-1736
  • 7 Calligaro K, Bergen WS, Haut MJ, Savarese RP, DeLaurentis DA. Thromboembolic complications in patients with advanced cancer: Anticoagulation versus Greenfield filter placement. Ann of Vas Sur 1991; 2: 186-189
  • 8 Clarke-Pearson DL, Synan IS, Creasman WT. Anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism in patients with gynecologic malignancy. Amer J Obstet Gyn 1983; 147 (04) 369-375
  • 9 Cohen JR, Tenenbaum N, Citron M. Greenfield filter as primary therapy for deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer. Surgery 1991; 109: 12-15
  • 10 Moore F, Osteen RT, Karp DD, Steele G, Wilson RE. Anticoagulants, venous thromboembolism and the cancer patient. Arch Surg 1981; 116: 405-407
  • 11 Zacharski LR, Henderson WG, Forman WB, Edwards RL, Cornell CJ, Forcier RJ, Headley E, Kim S, O’Donnell JF, O’Dell R, Tornyos K, Kwaan HC. Bleeding complications from warfarin anticoagulation in patients with malignancy. J Med 1985; 16 5-6 535-561
  • 12 Chan A, Woodruff RK. Complications and failure of anticoagulation therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with disseminated malignancy. Aust NZ J Med 1992; 22: 119-122
  • 13 Krauth D, Holden A, Knapic N, Liepman M, Ansell J. Safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation in cancer patients. Cancer 1987; 59: 983-985
  • 14 Olin JW, Young JR, Graor RA, Ruschhaupt WF, Beven EG, Bay JW. Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Emboli in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Arch Int Med 1987; 147: 2177-2179
  • 15 van der Meer FJ M, Rosendaal FR, Vandenbroucke Briet E. Bleeding complications in oral anticoagulant therapy. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 1557-1562
  • 16 Cortelazzo S, Finazzi G, Viero P. et al Thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis attending an anticoagulation clinic. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69 (04) 316-320
  • 17 Bussey HI, Rospond RM, Quandt CM, Clark GM. The Safety and Effectiveness of Long Term Warfarin Therapy in an Anticoagulant Clinic. Pharmacotherapy 1989; 9 (04) 214-219
  • 18 Levine M, Hirsh J, Gent M, Arnold A, Warr D, Falanga A, Samosh M, Bramwell V, Pritchard KI, Stewart D, Goodwin P. Double Blind randomised trial of very-low-dose warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in state IV breast cancer. Lancet 1994; 343: 886-889
  • 19 Hirsh J, Pollen L, Deykin D. Optimal Therapeutic Range for Oral Anticoagulants. Chest 1989; 95: 55-115