Hamostaseologie 1998; 18(01): 18-26
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655324
Übersichtsarbeiten/Review Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Management of venous thromboembolism

Current status and future perspectives
Sylvia Haas
1   Institut für Experimentelle Chirurgie,Technische Universität München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 June 2018 (online)

Summary

The therapy of deep venous thrombosis consists of several elements and depends on the localization, the age and the extent of the thrombus. In addition, the patient’s age and the life expectancy may influence the modality of treatment. The present overview discusses various types of initial therapy and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism and also reviews future perspectives of pharmacological treatment. The initial treatment regimens comprise thrombolysis, thrombectomy, inferior vena cava filters and the anticoagulation with either unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparins. Thrombolysis is only effective in the initial phase of acute thromboembolic disorders, and the potential benefits must be balanced against the risk of hemorrhage. In the case of totally occlusive venous thrombosis, a successful outcome is more likely if the thrombolytic agent is infused into the thrombus via catheter directed thrombolysis. Thrombectomy should be considered in patients with acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis of less than seven days duration and a life expectancy of more than ten years. A filter device should be inserted in the inferior vena cava in patients with venous thrombosis above the knee when anticoagulation is contraindicated or when adequate anticoagulation fails to prevent recurrent embolism. The intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin has been the modality of choice for initial treatment of venous thromboembolism during several decades, however, this type of therapy requires an aPTT-adjusted dosing due to a broad interindividual variation of laboratory results. Numerous clinical trials have provided firm evidence that low molecular weight heparins given subcutaneously are significantly superior to intravenous, unfractionated heparin with regard to thrombus regression and reductions of severe hemorrhages, mortality and recurrent thromboembolism. Thus, these preparations may become the treatment of choice in the near future. Pulmonary embolism may be treated with low molecular weight heparins as well.

Long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism is usually performed with oral anticoagulants. The recommended therapeutic range is an INR of 2.0 to 3.0, however the optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with acute proximal deep venous thrombosis is uncertain.

Various thrômbin-inhibitors have been tested for initial treatment of thrombosis, however further investigations of their efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness will have to provide firm evidence on their superiority when compared to unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 A Collaborative European Multicentre Study. A randomised trial of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (CY 216) compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1991; 65: 251.
  • 2 Albada J, Nieuwenhuis HK, Sixma JJ. et al. Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin). Results of a double-blind randomized study Circulation 1989; 80: 935.
  • 3 Barritt DW, Jordan SC. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. A controlled trial. Lancet 1960; 01: 1309.
  • 4 Basu D, Gallus A, Hirsh J. et al. A prospective study of the value of monitoring heparin treatment with activated partial thromboplastin time. N Engl J Med 1972; 287: 324-7.
  • 5 Brandjes DPM, Heijboer H, Büller HR. et al. Acenocoumarol and heparin compared with acenocoumarol alone in the initial treatment of proximal vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1485.
  • 6 Bratt G, Tornebohm E, Granqvist S. et al. A comparison between low molecular weight heparin (KAB1 2165) and standard heparin in the intravenous treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1985; 54: 813.
  • 7 Bratt G, Aberg W, Johansson M. et al. Two daily subcutaneous injections of Fragmin as compared with intravenous standard heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Thromb Haemost 1990; 64: 506.
  • 8 Brill-Edwards P, Ginsberg JS, Johnston M. et al. Establishing a therapeutic range for heparin therapy. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 104-9.
  • 9 Chiu HM, Hirsh J, Yung WL. Relationship between the anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects of heparin in experimental venous thrombosis. Blood 1977; 49: 171-84.
  • 10 Comerota AJ, Aldridge SC, Cohen G. et al. A strategy of aggressive regional therapy for acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis with contemporary venous thrombectomy or catheter-directed thrombolysis. J Vase Surg 1994; 20: 244.
  • 11 Crowther MA, Ginsberg JS. Direct thrombin inhibitors in venous thromboembolism. In: New therapeutic agents in thrombosis and thrombolysis. Marcel Dekker 1997; 159.
  • 12 Cruickshank MK, Levine MN, Hirsh J. A standard heparin nomogram for the management of heparin therapy. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 333.
  • 13 Eacute;tude Multicentrique Française. Traitement des thromboses veineuses profondes constituées. Étude comparative d’un fragment d’héparine de bas poids moléculaire (Frag-mine®) administrée par voie sous-cutanée et de l’héparine standard administrée par voie intraveineuse continue. Rev Med Interne 1985; 10: 375.
  • 14 Faivre R, Neuhart Y, Kieffer Y. et al. Un nouveau traitement des thromboses veineuses profondes: les fractions d’héparine des bas poids moléculaire. Étude randomisée. Presse Med 1985; 17: 197.
  • 15 Fiessinger JN, LopezFernandez M, Gatterer E. et al. Fragmin® once daily versus continuous infusion heparin in the treatment of DVT-an European multicentre trial (abstract). Haemostasis 1994; 24 Suppl. 1: 44.
  • 16 Ginsberg JS, Normohamed MT, Gent M. et al. Effects on thrombin generation of single injections of Hirulog in patients with calf vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72: 523.
  • 17 Goldhaber SZ, Buring JE, Lipnick RJ. et al. Pooled analyses of randomized trials of streptokinase and heparin in phlebographi-cally documented acute deep venous thrombosis. Am J Med 1984; 76: 393.
  • 18 Goldhaber SZ, Polak JF, Feldstein ML. et al. Efficacy and safety of repeated boluses of urokinase in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 75.
  • 19 Goldhaber SZ. Contemporary pulmonary embolism thrombolysis. Chest. 1995 107. Suppl: 45-51s.
  • 20 Harenberg J, Huck K, Bratsch H. et al. Therapeutic application of subcutaneous low molecular-weight heparin in acute venous thrombosis. Haemostasis 1990; 20 Suppl. 1: 205.
  • 21 Hirsh J, Siragusa S, Cosmi B. et al. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74: 360.
  • 22 Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1996; 93: 2212.
  • 23 Holm HA, Handeland GF, Abildgaard U. et al. Subcutaneous heparin treatment of deep venous thrombosis; a comparison of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin. Haemostasis 1985; 16 Suppl. 2: 30.
  • 24 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Hirsh J. et al. Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1109-14.
  • 25 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Rosenbloom D. et al. Heparin for 5 days compared with with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1260-4.
  • 26 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Pineo GF. et al. Subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 975.
  • 27 Hull RD, Raskob GGE, Rosenbloom D. et al. Optimal thrapeutic level of heparin in patients with venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 1589-95.
  • 28 Hyers TM, Hull RD, Weg JG. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest. 1995 108. Suppl: 335-351s..
  • 29 Kakkar VV. Dalteparin prevention of recurrent DVT-a study versus warfarin. Haemostasis 1994; 24 Suppl 1: abstr. 45.
  • 30 Kanter DS, Parker JA, Goldhaber SZ. Three hundred eighteen patients receiving thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: Rate of intracranial hemorrhage and assiciation with age. Ciculation 1995; 92 Suppl I: 484 (abstr)
  • 31 Koopman MMW, Prandoni P, Piovella F. et al. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 682.
  • 32 Koopman MMW, Kraaijenhagen RA, Biiller HR. The feasibility of low molecular weight heparin treatment of venous thromboembolism at home. Vessels 1997; 03: 12.
  • 33 Leizorovicz A, Simmoneau G, Décousus H. et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis; a meta-analysis. Br Med J 1994; 309: 299.
  • 34 Leizorovicz A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparins in the initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis. An updated meta-analysis. Drugs 1996; 52 Suppl 7: 30.
  • 35 Lensing AW, Prins MH, Davidson BL. et al. Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparins. A metaanalysis. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 601.
  • 36 Levine MN, Hirsh J, Gent M. et al. Optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy: A randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74: 606.
  • 37 Levine M, Gent M. Hirsh J, et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primilary at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 677.
  • 38 Lindmarker P, Holmström M, Granqvist S. et al. Comparison of once daily subcutaneous Fragmin with continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72: 186.
  • 39 Lohr J, James KV, Deshmukh RM. et al. Calf vein thrombi are not a benign finding. Am J Surg 1995; 170: 86.
  • 40 Lopaciuk S. Meissner AJ, Filipecki S, et al. Subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin versus subcutaneous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a Polish multicenter trial. Thromb Haemost 1992; 68: 14.
  • 41 Luomanmäki K, Hallert C, Kim H. Low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin®) once daily vs. continuous infusion of standard heparin in the treatment of DVT (abstract). Haemostasis 1994; 24 Suppl. 1: 248.
  • 42 Marache P, Asseman P, Jabinet JL. et al. Percutaneous transluminla venous angioplasty in occlusive iliac vein thrombosis resistant to thrombolysis. Am Heart J 1993; 125: 362.
  • 43 Meyer G, Brenot F, Pacouret G. et al. Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin Fragmin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of acute non massive pulmonary embolism. An open randomized pilot study. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74: 1432.
  • 44 Moia M, Schiele F, Walker M. et al. Treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by subcutaneous r-Hirudin (HBW 023): a multi-centre study. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73: 1456.
  • 45 Monreal M, Lafoz E, Olive A. et al. Comparison of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin with a low-molecular-weight heparin (Fragmin) in patients with venous thromboembolism and contraindications to coumarin. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71: 191.
  • 46 Notarbartolo A, Salanitri G, Davi G. et al. Low molecular weight heparin in the short and long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis in diabetic subjects. Med Praxis 1985; 09: 1.
  • 47 Parent F, Bridey F, Dreyfus M. et al. Treatment of severe venous thrombo-embolism with intravenous Hirudin (HBW 023): an open pilot study. Thromb Haemost 1993; 70: 386.
  • 48 Pini M, Aiello S, Manotti C. et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus warfarin in the prevention of recurrences after deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72: 191.
  • 49 Plate G, Einarsson E, Ohlin P. et al. Thrombectomy with temporary arteriovenous fistula; the treatment of choice in acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis. J Vase Surg 1984; 01: 867.
  • 50 Plate G, Akesson H, Einarsson E. et al. Long term results of venous thrombectomy combined with a temporary arteerio-venous fistula. Eur J Vase Surg 1990; 04: 483.
  • 51 Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Büller HR. et al. Comparison of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin with intravenous standard heparin in proximal deep vein thrombosis. Lancet 1992; 339: 441.
  • 52 Prevention of venous thromboembolism. International Consensus Statement (Guideline according to scientific evidence). Int Angiol 1997; 16: 3.
  • 53 Raschke RA, Reilly BM, Guidry JR. et al. The weight-based heparin dosing nomogram compared with a standard care nomogram: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 874-81.
  • 54 Schiele F, Vuillemenot A, Kramarz P. et al. A pilot study of subcutaneous recombinant hirudin (HBW 023) in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71: 558.
  • 55 Semba CP, Dake MD. Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: Aggressive therapy with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Radiology 1994; 191: 487.
  • 56 Simonneau G, Charbonnier B, Décousus H. et al. Subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of proximal vein thrombosis. A multicenter randomized trial: DVTENOX Study. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 1541.
  • 57 Simonneau G, Sors H, Charbonnier B. et al. A comparison of low-molecular weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 663.
  • 58 Siragusa S, Cosmi B, Piovella F. et al. Low-molecular-weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism: Results of a meta-analysis. Am J Med 1996; 100: 269.
  • 59 Tedoldi A, Botticella F, Maloberti MR. Antithrombophilic effect of low molecular weight heparins in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Clin Trials Meta-Anal 1993; 28: 215.
  • 60 The Columbus Investigators. Low-molecular weight heparin in the treatment of patients with thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 657.
  • 61 Théry D, Simonneau G, Meyer G. et al. Randomized trial of subcutaneous low-mole-cular-weight heparin CY 216 (Fraxiparine) compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the curative treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism: a dose-ranging study. Circulation 1992; 85: 1380.
  • 62 Warkentin TE, Levine NM. Hirsh et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1330.
  • 63 Zanghi M, Morici V, Costanzo M. et al. Deep vein thrombosis of the legs: new therapy by means of low molecular weight heparins. J Int Med Res 1985; 16: 474.