Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2018; 39(03): 211-222
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660780
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

External Memory Aid Preferences of Individuals with Mild Memory Impairments

Alyssa Lanzi
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
,
Sarah E. Wallace
2   Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
,
Michelle S. Bourgeois
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 June 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Individuals with mild memory impairments often rely on external memory aids (EMAs) to compensate for impaired cognitive abilities and to support independent completion of activities of daily living. These strategies are evidence based; however, professionals have limited knowledge regarding individual preferences and guidance on how to incorporate a person-centered approach into the EMA development phase. The purpose of the current study was to qualitatively investigate individuals' preferences and experiences as they relate to EMAs. Data analysis included (1) evaluation of a posttreatment questionnaire to explore individual strategy preferences following intervention and (2) evaluation of group intervention videos using thematic coding to investigate individuals' experiences with strategies during intervention. Results suggest that older adults with mild memory impairments have unique preferences and experiences, despite limited variability in demographic characteristics. Some themes that emerged included memory ability awareness and attitudes toward technology. Within a person-centered approach, skilled professionals must consider individuals' unique needs, preferences, and experiences when developing strategies throughout the continuum of care to promote sustained EMA use within everyday settings.

Keywords

person-centered care - external memory aids - preferences - neurocognitive - disorder - older adults
 

  • References

  • 1 Cohen-Mansfield J, Creedon MA, Malone TB, Kirkpatrick III MJ, Dutra LA, Herman RP. Electronic memory aids for community-dwelling elderly persons: attitudes, preferences, and potential utilization. J Appl Gerontol 2005; 24 (01) 3-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington: 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Sohlberg MM, Turkstra LS. Optimizing Cognitive Rehabilitation: Effective Instructional Methods. New York: Guilford Press; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Stott J, Spector A. A review of the effectiveness of memory interventions in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Int Psychogeriatr 2011; 23 (04) 526-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lanzi A, Burshnic V, Bourgeois MS. Person-centered memory and communication strategies for adults with dementia. Top Lang Disord 2017; 37 (04) 361-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bourgeois MS. Effects of memory aids on the dyadic conversations of individuals with dementia. J Appl Behav Anal 1993; 26 (01) 77-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bourgeois MS, Burgio LD, Schulz R, Beach S, Palmer B. Modifying repetitive verbalizations of community-dwelling patients with AD. Gerontologist 1997; 37 (01) 30-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hoerster L, Hickey EM, Bourgeois MS. Effects of memory aids on conversations between nursing home residents with dementia and nursing assistants. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2001; 11 (3–4): 399-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kinsella GJ, Mullaly E, Rand E. , et al. Early intervention for mild cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80 (07) 730-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hopper T, Bourgeois M, Pimentel J. , et al. An evidence-based systematic review on cognitive interventions for individuals with dementia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2013; 22 (01) 126-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gitlin LN, Schemm RL, Landsberg L, Burgh D. Factors predicting assistive device use in the home by older people following rehabilitation. J Aging Health 1996; 8 (04) 554-575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Scherer MJ. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27 (13) 731-739
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Epp TD. Person-centred dementia care: a vision to be refined. The Canadian Alzheimer Disease Review 2003; 5 (03) 14-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
  • 15 Scherer MJ, Hart T, Kirsch N, Schulthesis M. Assistive technologies for cognitive disabilities. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 2005; 17 (03) 195-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Brown J, Hux K, Hey M, Murphy M. Exploring cognitive support use and preference by college students with TBI: a mixed-methods study. NeuroRehabilitation 2017; 41 (02) 483-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wilson BA. Long-term prognosis of patients with severe memory disorders. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1991; 1 (02) 117-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wilson BA, Watson PC. A practical framework for understanding compensatory behaviour in people with organic memory impairment. Memory 1996; 4 (05) 465-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Evans JJ, Wilson BA, Needham P, Brentnall S. Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2003; 9 (06) 925-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lanzi A. Group External Memory Aid Treatment for Mild Cognitive Impairment [Master's Thesis]. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Moustakas C. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V. , et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53 (04) 695-699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Training use of compensatory memory books: a three stage behavioral approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989; 11 (06) 871-891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Bourgeois MS. Therapy techniques for mild cognitive impairment. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord 2013; 23 (01) 23-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hart T, Buchhofer R, Vaccaro M. Portable electronic devices as memory and organizational aids after traumatic brain injury: a consumer survey study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19 (05) 351-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wallace SE, Graham C, Saraceno A. Older adults' use of technology. Perspect on Gerontology 2013; 18 (02) 50-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar