Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(02): 118-123
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669907
SMFM Fellowship Series Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Chlorhexidine–Alcohol Compared with Povidone–Iodine Preoperative Skin Antisepsis for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mary Catherine Tolcher
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Megan D. Whitham
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Sherif A. El-Nashar
2   Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Steven L. Clark
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 January 2018

25 July 2018

Publication Date:
05 September 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To compare chlorhexidine–alcohol with povidone–iodine solutions for skin antisepsis prior to cesarean delivery for the prevention of surgical site infection.

Study Design Electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to August 2017. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing chlorhexidine–alcohol with povidone–iodine skin preparation solutions for women undergoing cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was surgical site infection including superficial or deep wound infection. Meta-analysis was performed, and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel random effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin's I 2.

Results Of 61 abstracts identified in the primary search, four studies (3,059 women) met the eligibility criteria. The risk of surgical site infection was significantly reduced with chlorhexidine–alcohol (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.52–0.98). No heterogeneity across studies was observed with I 2 = 0%. Subgroup analysis of superficial infection only or deep infection only showed no statistically significant difference (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54–1.08; and RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.23–1.10, respectively).

Conclusion Preoperative skin cleansing prior to cesarean delivery with chlorhexidine–alcohol reduces surgical site infection as compared with povidone–iodine solutions.

Keywords

cesarean delivery - surgical site infection - skin antisepsis - chlorhexidine
 

  • References

  • 1 Kawakita T, Landy HJ. Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 2017; 3: 12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (04) 294-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Caissutti C, Saccone G, Zullo F. , et al. Vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (03) 527-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hadiati DR, Hakimi M, Nurdiati DS, Ota E. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (09) CD007462
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tuuli MG, Liu J, Stout MJ. , et al. A randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (07) 647-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Springel EH, Wang XY, Sarfoh VM, Stetzer BP, Weight SA, Mercer BM. A randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217 (04) 463.e1-463.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ngai IM, Van Arsdale A, Govindappagari S. , et al. Skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (06) 1251-1257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 CDC. CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definitions for Specific Types of Infections. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/17pscnosinfdef_current.pdf . Accessed July 3, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Meaney-Delman D, Bartlett LA, Gravett MG, Jamieson DJ. Oral and intramuscular treatment options for early postpartum endometritis in low-resource settings: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (04) 789-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mackeen AD, Packard RE, Ota E, Speer L. Antibiotic regimens for postpartum endometritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (02) CD001067
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. , et al; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kunkle CM, Marchan J, Safadi S, Whitman S, Chmait RH. Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28 (05) 573-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Huang H, Li G, Wang H, He M. Optimal skin antiseptic agents for prevention of surgical site infection in cesarean section: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (24) 3267-3274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Menderes G, Athar Ali N, Aagaard K, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis in cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (05) 1037-1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Amer-Alshiek J, Alshiek T, Almog B. , et al. Can we reduce the surgical site infection rate in cesarean sections using a chlorhexidine-based antisepsis protocol?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26 (17) 1749-1752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 von Hippel PT. The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Srinivas A, Kaman L, Raj P. , et al. Comparison of the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine as preoperative skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infections in clean-contaminated upper abdominal surgeries. Surg Today 2015; 45 (11) 1378-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dumville JC, McFarlane E, Edwards P, Lipp A, Holmes A, Liu Z. Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (04) CD003949
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Darouiche RO, Wall Jr MJ, Itani KM. , et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (01) 18-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Park HM, Han SS, Lee EC. , et al. Randomized clinical trial of preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone-iodine. Br J Surg 2017; 104 (02) e145-e150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Noorani A, Rabey N, Walsh SR, Davies RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97 (11) 1614-1620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lee I, Agarwal RK, Lee BY, Fishman NO, Umscheid CA. Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31 (12) 1219-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12 (01) 147-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lim KS, Kam PC. Chlorhexidine--pharmacology and clinical applications. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008; 36 (04) 502-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hemani ML, Lepor H. Skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infection: which agent is best?. Rev Urol 2009; 11 (04) 190-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Armstrong EP, Patrick KL, Erstad BL. Comparison of preoperative skin preparation products. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21 (03) 345-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, Gross GA, Hamilton BH, Fraser VJ. Attributable costs of surgical site infection and endometritis after low transverse cesarean delivery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31 (03) 276-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar