Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2018; 36(02): 099-106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676084
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Evaluation of Female Pelvic Pain

Jessica Chandler   *
1   Section of Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
,
Elena Wagner   *
1   Section of Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
,
Kristin Riley
1   Section of Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 December 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain is a condition defined by pelvic pain for more than six months which is severe enough to cause functional disability or require treatment. When pain becomes a chronic condition, it is more challenging to evaluate and treat. Chronic pelvic pain patients often have multiple factors contributing to their pain. Here, we review the approach to the evaluation of chronic female pelvic pain. It is important to establish a trusting patient–physician relationship. When evaluating a female patient with chronic pelvic pain, an in-depth history and targeted physical exam can localize contributors to pain. While limited, corresponding imaging and laboratory work should also be considered.

Keywords

chronic pelvic pain - physical exam - imaging

* These authors contributed equally to the writing of this article.


 

  • References

  • 1 Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Lipschutz RC, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (03) 321-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Howard FM. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101 (03) 594-611
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lamvu G. Role of hysterectomy in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (05) 1175-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Frantsve LM, Kerns RD. Patient-provider interactions in the management of chronic pain: current findings within the context of shared medical decision making. Pain Med 2007; 8 (01) 25-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995; 152 (09) 1423-1433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Powell RA, Downing J, Ddungu H, Mwangi-Powell FN. Pain history and pain assessment. In: Kopf A, Patel NB. , eds. Guide to Pain Management in Low-Resource Settings. Seattle, WA: International Association for the Study of Pain; 2010: 67-78
    Google Scholar
  • 7 The International Pelvic Pain Society. Research Committee. Pelvic Pain Assessment Form. Birmingham, Alabama: The International Pelvic Pain Society. Available at: https://www.pelvicpain.org/IPPS/Professional/Documents-Forms/IPPS/Content/Professional-Patients/Documents_and_Forms.aspx?hkey=2597ab99-df83-40ee-89cd-7bd384efed19 . Accessed July 13, 2018
    PubMed
  • 8 World Health Organization 2016 WHO guidelines for the treatment of Genital Herpes Simplex Virus. Available at: http://who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/genital-HSV-treatment-guidelines/en/ . Accessed November 1, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Steege JF, Siedhoff MT. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (03) 616-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Walker E, Katon W, Harrop-Griffiths J, Holm L, Russo J, Hickok LR. Relationship of chronic pelvic pain to psychiatric diagnoses and childhood sexual abuse. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145 (01) 75-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Walling MK, Reiter RC, O'Hara MW, Milburn AK, Lilly G, Vincent SD. Abuse history and chronic pain in women: I. Prevalences of sexual abuse and physical abuse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84 (02) 193-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Okaro E, Condous G, Khalid A. , et al. The use of ultrasound-based ‘soft markers’ for the prediction of pelvic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain--can we reduce the need for laparoscopy?. BJOG 2006; 113 (03) 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89 (11) 1374-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hudelist G, English J, Thomas AE, Tinelli A, Singer CF, Keckstein J. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37 (03) 257-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ignacio EA, Dua R, Sarin S. , et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Intervent Radiol 2008; 25 (04) 361-368
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rozenblit AM, Ricci ZJ, Tuvia J, Amis Jr ES. Incompetent and dilated ovarian veins: a common CT finding in asymptomatic parous women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176 (01) 119-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Steenbeek MP, van der Vleuten CJM, Schultze Kool LJ, Nieboer TE. Noninvasive diagnostic tools for pelvic congestion syndrome: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97 (07) 776-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mol BW, Bayram N, Lijmer JG. , et al. The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1998; 70 (06) 1101-1108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar