Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32(02): 129-133
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676478
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Colorectal Surgery: A Review of the Economic Implications

Alexander B. Stone
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Michael C. Grant
2   Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Christopher L. Wu
2   Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Elizabeth C. Wick
3   Department of Surgery, The University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 February 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are transdisciplinary, evidence-based perioperative protocols that aim to standardize best practices and increase the value of delivered healthcare. Quality improvement programs such as ERAS for colorectal surgery have been linked to a reduction in rates of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) including surgical site infection as well as a reduction in overall length of stay. Importantly, to achieve these results, hospitals must commit to fostering transdisciplinary collaboration across surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing, as well as alignment between frontline providers and hospital executives. This requires upfront investment as well as ongoing resource allocation to sustain the program but given the magnitude of the potential impact of a successful ERAS program on multiple domains of quality and safety, the investment will easily reap ongoing rewards. The purpose of this manuscript is to outline implementation and sustainability costs of an ERAS program as well as discuss the potential cost savings related to the program to further inform hospitals considering adoption of this approach to care.

Keywords

ERAS implementation cost - cost savings - ERAS hospital charges
 

  • References

  • 1 Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (02) CD007635
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lau CS, Chamberlain RS. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs improve patient outcomes and recovery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 2017; 41 (04) 899-913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Grant MC, Yang D, Wu CL, Makary MA, Wick EC. Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and fast track surgery pathways on healthcare-associated infections: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (01) 68-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kehlet H, Büchler MW, Beart Jr RW, Billingham RP, Williamson R. Care after colonic operation--is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202 (01) 45-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27 (03) 759-769
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (03) 292-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 MacFie J. Enhanced recovery after surgery is obsolete. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (10) 1002-1003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pędziwiatr M, Kisialeuski M, Wierdak M. , et al. Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol - compliance improves outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2015; 21: 75-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio Roda C. , et al. Implementation costs of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on experiences at a quaternary academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222 (03) 219-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S. , et al. Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2013; 100 (08) 1108-1114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W. , et al; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31 (06) 783-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lee L, Mata J, Ghitulescu GA. , et al. Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (06) 1026-1033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lee L, Li C, Landry T. , et al. A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2014; 259 (04) 670-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Keenan JE, Speicher PJ, Nussbaum DP. , et al. Improving outcomes in colorectal surgery by sequential implementation of multiple standardized care programs. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221 (02) 404-14.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE. , et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220 (04) 430-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Adamina M, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Kehlet H. A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (05) e138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD. , et al; Enhanced Recovery Study Group. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 2014; 118 (05) 1052-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A, Kahokehr A, Hill AG. A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 2010; 123 (1319): 61-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Archibald LH, Ott MJ, Gale CM, Zhang J, Peters MS, Stroud GK. Enhanced recovery after colon surgery in a community hospital system. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (07) 840-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW. , et al; LAFA Study Group. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011; 254 (06) 868-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ. , et al. Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a “fast track” postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (02) 137-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P. , et al. The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8 (06) 506-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Blazeby JM, Soulsby M, Winstone K, King PM, Bulley S, Kennedy RH. A qualitative evaluation of patients' experiences of an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (10 Online): e236-e242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Taheri PA, Butz DA, Greenfield LJ. Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191 (02) 123-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ, Skinner JS. Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States. Ann Surg 2012; 255 (01) 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 McLeod RS, Aarts M-A, Chung F. , et al. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guideline and implementation strategy based on the knowledge-to-action cycle. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (06) 1016-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wick EC, Galante DJ, Hobson DB. , et al. Organizational culture changes result in improvement in patient-centered outcomes: implementation of an integrated recovery pathway for surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221 (03) 669-677 , quiz 785–786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McEvoy MD, Wanderer JP, King AB. , et al. A perioperative consult service results in reduction in cost and length of stay for colorectal surgical patients: evidence from a healthcare redesign project. Perioper Med (Lond) 2016; 5: 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lee D, Haynes C, Deans G, Cook G. Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery in a district general hospital: implications of a pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17 (06) 1243-1245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gani F, Makary MA, Wick EC. , et al. Bundled payments for surgical colectomy among Medicare enrollees: potential savings vs the need for further reform. JAMA Surg 2016; 151 (05) e160202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar