Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32(02): 139-148
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677751
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Percutaneous Tibial Fracture Reduction Using Computed Tomography Imaging, Computer Modelling and 3D Printed Alignment Constructs: A Cadaveric Study

Albert C. Lynch
1   Santa Cruz Veterinary Hospital, Santa Cruz, California, United States
,
John A. Davies
2   Southern Oregon Veterinary Specialty Center, Central Point, Oregon, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 May 2018

04 December 2018

Publication Date:
13 February 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The main aim of this study was to evaluate a percutaneous method of bone alignment using a diaphyseal tibial fracture model.

Materials and Methods Mid-shaft diaphyseal fractures were created in 12 large-breed canine tibiae. Interaction pins were inserted into the proximal and distal bone segments. Computed tomography scans of the fractured tibiae and pins were imported into three-dimensional (3D) modelling software and the fractures were virtually reduced. A multi-component 3D printed alignment jig was created that encompassed the pins in their aligned configuration. Orthogonal radiographs were taken after alignment jig application. Intact and post-alignment tibial lengths and joint angles were compared. Rotational alignment was subjectively evaluated.

Results Post-alignment tibial lengths differed on the mediolateral and craniocaudal radiographs by an average of 1.55 and 1.43% respectively. Post-alignment mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, mechanical medial distal tibial angle and mechanical caudal proximal tibial angle had an average difference of 1.67°, 1.92° and 2.17° respectively. Differences in tibial length and joint angles were not significant (p > 0.05).

Clinical Significance While in vivo evaluation is necessary, this technique to align diaphyseal fractures percutaneously using computer modelling and 3D printing is technically feasible and may facilitate the clinical use of minimally invasive osteosynthesis techniques.

Keywords

tibia - three-dimensional printing - fracture alignment - canine - minimally invasive osteosynthesis

Authors' Contribution

Both authors contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Both authors also drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.


Note

The results of this report have been presented at the 2017 American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS) Surgery Summit held at Indianapolis, IN, on October 14, 2017 and Veterinary Orthopedic Society (VOS) Conference held at Snowmass Village, CO on March 10, 2018.


 

  • References

  • 1 Chao P, Lewis DD, Kowaleski MP, Pozzi A. Biomechanical concepts applicable to minimally invasive fracture repair in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42 (05) 853-872 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Grundnes O, Reikerås O. The importance of the hematoma for fracture healing in rats. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64 (03) 340-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mizuno K, Mineo K, Tachibana T, Sumi M, Matsubara T, Hirohata K. The osteogenetic potential of fracture haematoma. Subperiosteal and intramuscular transplantation of the haematoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72 (05) 822-829
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Helfet DL, Haas NP, Schatzker J, Matter P, Moser R, Hanson B. AO philosophy and principles of fracture management-its evolution and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (06) 1156-1160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pozzi A, Risselada M, Winter MD. Assessment of fracture healing after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation of coexisting radius and ulna fractures in dogs via ultrasonography and radiography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 241 (06) 744-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Harasen G. Biologic repair of fractures. Can Vet J 2002; 43 (04) 299-301
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rhinelander FW. The normal microcirculation of diaphyseal cortex and its response to fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1968; 50 (04) 784-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (08) 1093-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Palmer RH. Biological osteosynthesis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29 (05) 1171-1185 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Guiot LP, Déjardin LM. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (02) 171-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Boero Baroncelli A, Peirone B, Winter MD, Reese DJ, Pozzi A. Retrospective comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open plating for tibial fractures in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25 (05) 410-417
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Horstman CL, Beale BS, Conzemius MG, Evans R R. Biological osteosynthesis versus traditional anatomic reconstruction of 20 long-bone fractures using an interlocking nail: 1994-2001. Vet Surg 2004; 33 (03) 232-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Peirone B, Rovesti GL, Baroncelli AB, Piras L. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis fracture reduction techniques in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42 (05) 873-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Guiot LP, Déjardin LM. Perioperative imaging in minimally invasive osteosynthesis in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42 (05) 897-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H. , et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J CARS 2010; 5 (04) 335-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hespel AM, Wilhite R, Hudson J. Invited review--applications for 3D printers in veterinary medicine. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55 (04) 347-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hoang D, Perrault D, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A. Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4 (23) 456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Giannatsis J, Dedoussis V. Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2007; 40 (1–2): 116-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rankin TM, Giovinco NA, Cucher DJ, Watts G, Hurwitz B, Armstrong DG. Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: are we there yet?. J Surg Res 2014; 189 (02) 193-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hamilton-Bennett SE, Oxley B, Behr S. Accuracy of a patient-specific 3D printed drill guide for placement of cervical transpedicular screws. Vet Surg 2018; 47 (02) 236-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Phan K, Sgro A, Maharaj MM, D'Urso P, Mobbs RJ. Application of a 3D custom printed patient specific spinal implant for C1/2 arthrodesis. J Spine Surg 2016; 2 (04) 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ. 3D printing in orthognathic surgery - a literature review. J Formos Med Assoc 2018; 117 (07) 547-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook JL, Witsberger TH. Radiographic measurement of canine tibial angles in the sagittal plane. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (03) 300-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB. , et al. Radiographic measurement of the proximal and distal mechanical joint angles in the canine tibia. Veterinary surgery 2007; 36 (07) 699-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP. , et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: an in vitro experimental study. Veterinary Surgery 2001; 30 (03) 278-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF, Solano M, McCarthy RJ, Boudrieau RJ. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32 (05) 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Johnson AL. Current concepts in fracture reduction. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16 (02) 59-66
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pozzi A, Hudson CC, Gauthier CM, Lewis DD. Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation of radius-ulna fractures in dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (01) 19-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Johnson AL, Kneller SK, Weigel RM. Radial and tibial fracture repair with external skeletal fixation. Effects of fracture type, reduction, and complications on healing. Vet Surg 1989; 18 (05) 367-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Seaman JA, Simpson AM. Tibial fractures. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2004; 19 (03) 151-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Zaal MD, Hazewinkel HA. Treatment of isolated tibial fractures in cats and dogs. Vet Q 1997; 19 (04) 191-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Aron DN, Johnson AL, Palmer RH. Biologic strategies and a balanced concept for repair of highly comminuted long bone fractures. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1995; 17: 35-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hulse D, Hyman W, Nori M, Slater M. Reduction in plate strain by addition of an intramedullary pin. Vet Surg 1997; 26 (06) 451-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Selmi AL, Padilha Filho JG. Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament associated with deformity of the proximal tibia in five dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2001; 42 (08) 390-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Read RA, Robins GM. Deformity of the proximal tibia in dogs. Vet Rec 1982; 111 (13) 295-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Franczuszki D, Chalman JA, Butler HC. , et al. Postoperative effects of experimental femoral shortening in the mature dog. J Am Animal Hosp Assoc 1987; 23: 429-437
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Peters KM, Hutter E, Siston RA, Bertran J, Allen MJ. Surgical navigation improves the precision and accuracy of tibial component alignment in canine total knee replacement. Vet Surg 2016; 45 (01) 52-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Harrysson OLA, Cormier DR, Marcellin-Little DJ. , et al. Rapid prototyping for treatment of canine limb deformities. Rapid Prototyping J 2003; 9 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 DeTora MD, Boudrieau RJ. Complex angular and torsional deformities (distal femoral malunions). Preoperative planning using stereolithography and surgical correction with locking plate fixation in four dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (05) 416-425
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kwan TW, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OLA. Correction of biapical radial deformities by use of bi-level hinged circular external fixation and distraction osteogenesis in 13 dogs. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (03) 316-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Oxley B. A 3-dimensional-printed patient-specific guide system for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of a comminuted mid-diaphyseal humeral fracture in a cat. Vet Surg 2018; 47 (03) 445-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Dismukes DI, Fox DB, Tomlinson JL, Cook JL, Essman SC. Determination of pelvic limb alignment in the large-breed dog: a cadaveric radiographic study in the frontal plane. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (07) 674-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Edgerton BC, An K-N, Morrey BF. Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orthop Res 1990; 8 (06) 851-855
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar