Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2019; 119(06): 882-893
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683428
Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Changes in Oral Anticoagulation Therapy over One Year in 51,000 Atrial Fibrillation Patients at Risk for Stroke: A Practice-Derived Study

Stefan H. Hohnloser
1   Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Edin Basic
2   Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, Berlin, Germany
,
Michael Nabauer
3   Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.
Further Information

Publication History

16 November 2018

31 January 2019

Publication Date:
21 March 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background This study assessed changes in anticoagulation therapy over time in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods Analyses were performed on a claims-based dataset of 4 million health-insured individuals. The study population consisted of patients newly initiating a non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for AF between 2013 and 2016. The study outcomes consisted of the proportion of patients who had (1) discontinued OAC treatment, (2) switched from VKA to NOAC, (3) switched from NOAC to VKA or (4) switched from one NOAC to another. Predictors of discontinuation or switching of OAC treatment were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-independent and time-dependent covariates.

Results The study population comprised 51,606 AF patients initiating VKA (n = 21,468, 41.6%), apixaban (n = 8,832, 17.1%), dabigatran (n = 3,973, 7.7%) or rivaroxaban (n = 17,333, 33.6%). After 1 year, 29.9% of VKA and 29.5% of NOAC patients had discontinued OAC treatment without switching to another anticoagulant. A total of 10.7% of VKA patients switched to NOACs within 1 year, whereas 4.9% NOAC patients had switched to VKA. Of AF patients who were initiated on a NOAC, 5.2% switched to another NOAC. Treatment changes among NOAC starters were strongly associated with occurrence of stroke, myocardial infarction and gastrointestinal bleeding after treatment initiation. For VKA starters switching to a NOAC, stroke and bleeding events were associated with an increased likelihood of switching.

Conclusion Overall discontinuation rates of VKA and NOACs are comparable over the first year of therapy, while switching from VKA to NOAC was more common than from NOAC to VKA. The majority of treatment changes were associated with clinical events.

Keywords

atrial fibrillation - non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants - vitamin K antagonist - discontinuation - switching

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY. , et al; European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31 (19) 2369-2429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146 (12) 857-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Martinez C, Katholing A, Wallenhorst C, Freedman SB. Therapy persistence in newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin or NOAC. A cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2016; 115 (01) 31-39
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Forslund T, Wettermark B, Hjemdahl P. Comparison of treatment persistence with different oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 72 (03) 329-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hellfritzsch M, Grove EL, Husted SE. , et al. Clinical events preceding switching and discontinuation of oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace 2017; 19 (07) 1091-1095
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 van den Heuvel JM, Hövels AM, Büller HR, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, de Boer A, Maitland-van der Zee AH. NOACs replace VKA as preferred oral anticoagulant among new patients: a drug utilization study in 560 pharmacies in The Netherlands. Thromb J 2018; 16: 7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lip GYH, Pan X, Kamble S. , et al. Discontinuation risk comparison among ‘real-world’ newly anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients: apixaban, warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. PLoS One 2018; 13 (04) e0195950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pottegård A, Poulsen BK, Larsen MD, Hallas J. Dynamics of vitamin K antagonist and new oral anticoagulants use in atrial fibrillation: a Danish drug utilization study. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12 (09) 1413-1418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Beyer-Westendorf J, Förster K, Ebertz F. , et al. Drug persistence with rivaroxaban therapy in atrial fibrillation patients-results from the Dresden non-interventional oral anticoagulation registry. Europace 2015; 17 (04) 530-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tsai K, Erickson SC, Yang J, Harada AS, Solow BK, Lew HC. Adherence, persistence, and switching patterns of dabigatran etexilate. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19 (09) e325-e332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Andersohn F, Walker J. Characteristics and external validity of the German Health Risk Institute (HRI) Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016; 25 (01) 106-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lamberts M, Lip GY, Hansen ML. , et al. Relation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to serious bleeding and thromboembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving antithrombotic therapy: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161 (10) 690-698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. , et al; RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (12) 1139-1151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J. , et al; ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (10) 883-891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV. , et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (11) 981-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sørensen R, Jamie Nielsen B, Langtved Pallisgaard J, Ji-Young Lee C, Torp-Pedersen C. Adherence with oral anticoagulation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a comparison of vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K antagonists. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2017; 3 (03) 151-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Durham TA, Hassmiller Lich K, Viera AJ. , et al. Utilization of standard and target-specific oral anticoagulants among adults in the United Kingdom with incident atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2017; 120 (10) 1820-1829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Manzoor BS, Walton SM, Sharp LK, Galanter WL, Lee TA, Nutescu EA. High number of newly initiated direct oral anticoagulant users switch to alternate anticoagulant therapy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2017; 44 (04) 435-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Beyer-Westendorf J, Gelbricht V, Förster K. , et al. Safety of switching from vitamin K antagonists to dabigatran or rivaroxaban in daily care--results from the Dresden NOAC registry. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 78 (04) 908-917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nishino M, Okamoto N, Tanaka A. , et al. Different risk factors for bleeding and discontinuation between dabigatran and rivaroxaban. J Cardiol 2016; 68 (02) 156-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hellfritzsch M, Hyllested LMR, Meegaard L, Wiberg-Hansen A, Grove EL, Pottegård A. Switching, adverse effects and use of over-the-counter analgesics among users of oral anticoagulants: a pharmacy-based survey. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2017; 121 (01) 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nührich JM, Kuck KH, Andresen D. , et al. Oral anticoagulation is frequently discontinued after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation despite previous stroke: data from the German Ablation Registry. Clin Res Cardiol 2015; 104 (06) 463-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Beyer-Westendorf J, Ebertz F, Förster K. , et al. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran therapy in daily-care patients with atrial fibrillation. Results from the Dresden NOAC Registry. Thromb Haemost 2015; 113 (06) 1247-1257
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Papp J, Zima E, Bover R. , et al. Changes in oral anticoagulation for elective cardioversion: results from a European cardioversion registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2017; 3 (03) 147-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hohnloser SH, Oldgren J, Yang S. , et al. Myocardial ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran or warfarin in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial. Circulation 2012; 125 (05) 669-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Holster IL, Valkhoff VE, Kuipers EJ, Tjwa ETTL. New oral anticoagulants increase risk for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2013; 145 (01) 105-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Diener HC, Eikelboom J, Connolly SJ. , et al; AVERROES Steering Committee and Investigators. Apixaban versus aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a predefined subgroup analysis from AVERROES, a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11 (03) 225-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar