J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(08): 609-615
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688748
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Latissimus Denervation: A Review of Evidence

Christopher D. Lopez
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
,
Franca Kraenzlin
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Christopher Frost
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Halley Darrach
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Pathik Aravind
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Justin M. Sacks
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 November 2018

17 March 2019

Publication Date:
08 May 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Breast reconstruction is becoming an increasingly important and accessible component of breast cancer care. Among the many reconstructive options available, the latissimus dorsi flap has experienced a renewal in popularity because of its favorable properties and outcomes when used for breast reconstruction. However, a limitation unique to latissimus-based reconstruction is inappropriate breast animation postoperatively, due to persistent thoracodorsal innervation of the latissimus dorsi muscle after transfer to the mastectomy site.

Methods A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for studies investigating the role of thoracodorsal denervation in latissimus-based breast reconstruction. Data on surgical techniques, type of intervention, objective outcome measurements, and patient satisfaction-based outcomes were reported. Additional data included patient sample size, follow-up length, and treatment of thoracodorsal nerve (e.g., resection versus transection and length of transection) when applicable.

Results Sixty-six search results were reviewed for inclusion and nine qualified after exclusion criteria for a total of 361 patients undergoing either unilateral or bilateral latissimus flap reconstruction. Successful thoracodorsal denervation rates were included in most studies and outcomes measurements were heterogeneous. Eight out of nine studies included patient-reported symptoms of breast animation postoperatively. Based on these findings, a systematic approach is presented.

Conclusion We present this review to elucidate successful practices, identify current gaps in knowledge, and offer a systematic approach to this clinical challenge.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cancer Facts and Figures 2018. American Cancer Society. 2018. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html
  • 2 2016 National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery. 2016. (Accessed January 25th 2019, 2019 . Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2016/2016-plastic-surgery-statistics-report.pdf
  • 3 Miller AM, Steiner CA, Barrett ML, Fingar KR, Elixhauser A. Breast reconstruction surgery for mastectomy in hospital inpatient and ambulatory settings, 2009–2014: statistical brief #228. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2017
  • 4 Hammond DC. Latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2007; 34 (01) 75-82 , abstract vi–vii
  • 5 Paolini G, Amoroso M, Pugliese P, Longo B, Santanelli F. Functional sequelae following bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: medium-term follow-up. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014; 48 (02) 99-103
  • 6 Laporta R, Sorotos M, Longo B, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Tips and tricks to improve clinical and aesthetic outcomes in latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (07) 455-465
  • 7 Hammond DC. Latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (04) 1055-1063
  • 8 Figus A, Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Curinga G, Scuderi N. Treatment of muscular contraction deformities with botulinum toxin type A after latissimus dorsi flap and sub-pectoral implant breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (07) 869-875
  • 9 Schroegendorfer KF, Hacker S, Nickl S, Vierhapper M, Nedomansky J, Haslik W. Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: how much nerve resection is necessary to prevent postoperative muscle twitching? . Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1125-1129
  • 10 Halperin TJ, Fox SE, Caterson SA, Slavin SA, Morris DJ. Delayed division of the thoracodorsal nerve: a useful adjunct in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (01) 23-25
  • 11 Kääriäinen M, Giordano S, Kauhanen S, Helminen M, Kuokkanen H. No need to cut the nerve in LD reconstruction to avoid jumping of the breast: a prospective randomized study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (08) 1106-1110
  • 12 Paolini G, Longo B, Laporta R, Sorotos M, Amoroso M, Santanelli F. Permanent latissimus dorsi muscle denervation in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (06) 639-642
  • 13 Kääriäinen M, Giordano S, Kauhanen S. , et al. The significance of latissimus dorsi flap innervation in delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective randomized study-magnetic resonance imaging and histologic findings. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 637e-645e
  • 14 Szychta P, Butterworth M, Dixon M, Kulkarni D, Stewart K, Raine C. Breast reconstruction with the denervated latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Breast 2013; 22 (05) 667-672
  • 15 Chiang IH, Wang CH, Tzeng YS. , et al. Breast reconstruction using pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in Asian patients with small breasts. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (03) (Suppl. 02) S95-S101
  • 16 Sbitany H. Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction): 7S-13S