J Knee Surg 2021; 34(07): 699-704
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700839
Original Article

Femoral Trochlear Geometry in Patients with Trochlear Dysplasia Using MRI Oblique Trochlear View

Luiz Felipe Ambra
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo—Escola Paulista de Medicina (DOT—UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil
,
Pedro Henrique Schmidt Alves Ferreira Galvão
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo—Escola Paulista de Medicina (DOT—UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil
,
Enzo Salviatto Mameri
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo—Escola Paulista de Medicina (DOT—UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil
,
Jack Farr
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OrthoIndy Knee Preservation Cartilage Restoration Center of Indiana, Greenwood, Indiana
,
Andreas H. Gomoll
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate trochlear morphology in patients with trochlear dysplasia using a new oblique trochlear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) view (OTV) in comparison with standard axial MRI sequences. MRI exam of 73 patients with patellofemoral instability (PFI) and the same number of controls were retrospectively reviewed. The oblique trochlear sequence was acquired by inclining the axial plane parallel to the intercondylar roof of the sagittal image, showing the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in its entire length. Trochlear morphology was assessed on axial and oblique trochlear sequences at three levels: level 1 at 25%, level 2 at 50%, and level 3 at 75% of the length of the trochlear groove. Trochlear sulcus angle and sulcus depth were measured at these three levels and compared between the new trochlear and standard axial sequences. Trochlear sulcus angle and sulcus depth were statistically different between axial and oblique trochlear views at all three levels (p < 0,05). Additionally, OTV displayed more uniform sulcus angle and depth along the trochlea. The oblique trochlear view on the MRI can more accurately evaluate trochlear morphology and also better characterize trochlear dysplasia in patients with PFI. This is Level III, retrospective comparative study.



Publication History

Received: 15 October 2018

Accepted: 18 September 2019

Article published online:
07 November 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Colvin AC, West RV. Patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (12) 2751-2762
  • 2 Waterman BR, Belmont Jr PJ, Owens BD. Patellar dislocation in the United States: role of sex, age, race, and athletic participation. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (01) 51-57
  • 3 White BJ, Sherman OH. Patellofemoral instability. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009; 67 (01) 22-29
  • 4 Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S. MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics 2010; 30 (04) 961-981
  • 5 Brattström H. Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of patella: a clinical and X-ray anatomical investigation. Acta Orthop Scand 1964; 35 (68) 1-148
  • 6 Dejour D, Reynaud P, Lecoultre B. Douleurs et instabilité rotulienne, Essai de classification. Med Hyg (Geneve) 1998; 56 (2217): 1466-1471
  • 7 Dejour HI, Walch G, Neyret P, Adeleine P. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1990; 76 (01) 45-54
  • 8 Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1994; 2 (01) 19-26
  • 9 Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Nelimarkka O, Komu M, Kujala UM. Magnetic resonance imaging of patellofemoral relationships. Skeletal Radiol 1993; 22 (06) 403-410
  • 10 Shih Y-F, Bull AM, Amis AA. The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004; 12 (04) 300-306
  • 11 Stäubli H-U, Dürrenmatt U, Porcellini B, Rauschning W. Anatomy and surface geometry of the patellofemoral joint in the axial plane. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (03) 452-458
  • 12 Toms AP, Cahir J, Swift L, Donell ST. Imaging the femoral sulcus with ultrasound, CT, and MRI: reliability and generalizability in patients with patellar instability. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38 (04) 329-338
  • 13 van Huyssteen AL, Hendrix MRG, Barnett AJ, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JDJ. Cartilage-bone mismatch in the dysplastic trochlea. An MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (05) 688-691
  • 14 Chhabra A, Subhawong TK, Carrino JA. A systematised MRI approach to evaluating the patellofemoral joint. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40 (04) 375-387
  • 15 Elias DA, White LM, Fithian DC. Acute lateral patellar dislocation at MR imaging: injury patterns of medial patellar soft-tissue restraints and osteochondral injuries of the inferomedial patella. Radiology 2002; 225 (03) 736-743
  • 16 Yi M, Hong SH, Choi J-Y. et al. Femoral trochlear groove morphometry assessed on oblique coronal MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205 (06) 1260-1268
  • 17 Iwano T, Kurosawa H, Tokuyama H, Hoshikawa Y. Roentgenographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral osteoarthrosis. With special reference to its relationship to femorotibial osteoarthrosis and etiologic factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (252) 190-197
  • 18 Pfirrmann CWA, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J. Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology 2000; 216 (03) 858-864
  • 19 Malghem J, Maldague B. Depth insufficiency of the proximal trochlear groove on lateral radiographs of the knee: relation to patellar dislocation. Radiology 1989; 170 (02) 507-510
  • 20 Rémy F, Chantelot C, Fontaine C, Demondion X, Migaud H, Gougeon F. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility in radiographic diagnosis and classification of femoral trochlear dysplasia. Surg Radiol Anat 1998; 20 (04) 285-289
  • 21 Tscholl PM, Wanivenhaus F, Fucentese SF. Conventional radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging for the analysis of trochlear dysplasia: the influence of selected levels on magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (05) 1059-1065