Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2020; 30(01): 104-110
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402712
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Outcomes of Primary versus Multiple-Staged Repair in Hirschsprung's Disease in England

Stefano Giuliani    *
1   Division of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Kate Honeyford   *
2   Dr Foster Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Chieh-Yu Chang
2   Dr Foster Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Alex Bottle
2   Dr Foster Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Paul Aylin
2   Dr Foster Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 May 2019

03 December 2019

Publication Date:
07 January 2020 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction The study aimed to compare 1-year outcomes for primary versus multiple-staged (three operations with colostomy) repairs in Hirschsprung's disease (HD).

Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of a large national administrative database (Hospital Episode Statistics) including all the neonates born with HD in England between 2003 and 2015. Main outcomes were: 1-year mortality, postoperative readmissions, and reoperations. Secondary outcomes: cumulative length of hospital stay (cLOS) and hospital volume–outcome relationship.

Results A total of 1,333 neonates with HD were treated in 21 specialist pediatric surgical centers; 874 (65.5%) patients had a primary repair for HD. One-year mortality was 2.8%. The overall readmission rate was 70.2%, with a significant difference between primary and multiple-staged repair (79.9 vs. 90.1%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in reoperation. Primary pull-through was associated with a significantly lower probability of postoperative readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06–0.11, p < 0.001) and cLOS (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.28–0.52, p < 0.001) compared with multiple-staged repair. There were no significant difference in outcomes between patients treated in low-volume (<37 cases/year) and high-volume (> 55 cases/year) specialist centers.

Conclusion Whenever clinically indicated, primary repair should be used in HD as this is associated with fewer readmissions and shorter time spent in the hospital.

Keywords

Hirschsprung's disease - outcomes - primary repair - multiple-staged - length of stay

* Stefano Giuliani and Kate Honeyford share the first authorship.


Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 de Lorijn F, Boeckxstaens GE, Benninga MA. Symptomatology, pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, and treatment of Hirschsprung disease in infancy and childhood. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2007; 9 (03) 245-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Langer JC, Durrant AC, de la Torre L. , et al. One-stage transanal Soave pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease: a multicenter experience with 141 children. Ann Surg 2003; 238 (04) 569-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bradnock TJ, Knight M, Kenny S, Nair M, Walker GM. ; British Association of Paediatric Surgeons Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System. Hirschsprung's disease in the UK and Ireland: incidence and anomalies. Arch Dis Child 2017; 102 (08) 722-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Haricharan RN, Georgeson KE. Hirschsprung disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 2008; 17 (04) 266-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 De La Torre L, Langer JC. Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: technique, controversies, pearls, pitfalls, and an organized approach to the management of postoperative obstructive symptoms. Semin Pediatr Surg 2010; 19 (02) 96-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zani A, Eaton S, Morini F. , et al; EUPSA Network Office. European Paediatric Surgeons' Association survey on the management of Hirschsprung disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2017; 27 (01) 96-101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bandi AS, Bradshaw CJ, Giuliani S. Advances in minimally invasive neonatal colorectal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8 (10) 670-678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Strebeck J. Acute & chronic wounds: current management concepts. AORN J 2007; 86 (04) 677-678
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Faiz O, Brown T, Bottle A, Burns EM, Darzi AW, Aylin P. Impact of hospital institutional volume on postoperative mortality after major emergency colorectal surgery in English National Health Service Trusts, 2001 to 2005. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53 (04) 393-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 NHS Digital. Available at: http://content.digital.nhs.uk/hes . Accessed January 31, 2018
    PubMed
  • 11 Burns EM, Bottle A, Aylin P, Darzi A, Nicholls RJ, Faiz O. Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. BMJ 2011; 343: d4836
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Best KE, Glinianaia SV, Bythell M, Rankin J. Hirschsprung's disease in the North of England: prevalence, associated anomalies, and survival. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012; 94 (06) 477-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Burns EM, Bottle A, Almoudaris AM. , et al. Hierarchical multilevel analysis of increased caseload volume and postoperative outcome after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2013; 100 (11) 1531-1538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wang Y, Honeyford K, Aylin P, Bottle A, Giuliani S. One-year outcomes for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. BJS Open 2019; 3 (03) 305-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sulkowski JP, Cooper JN, Congeni A. , et al. Single-stage versus multi-stage pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: practice trends and outcomes in infants. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (11) 1619-1625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bradnock TJ, Knight M, Kenny S, Nair M, Walker GM. ; British Association of Paediatric Surgeons Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (BAPS-CASS). The use of stomas in the early management of Hirschsprung disease: findings of a national, prospective cohort study. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (09) 1451-1457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Swenson O. Hirschsprung's disease: a review. Pediatrics 2002; 109 (05) 914-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hackam DJ, Superina RA, Pearl RH. Single-stage repair of Hirschsprung's disease: a comparison of 109 patients over 5 years. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (07) 1028-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Shinall Jr MC, Koehler E, Shyr Y, Lovvorn III HN. Comparing cost and complications of primary and staged surgical repair of neonatally diagnosed Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (12) 2220-2225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 van den Hondel D, Sloots C, Meeussen C, Wijnen R. To split or not to split: colostomy complications for anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung disease: a single center experience and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014; 24 (01) 61-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liechty ST, Barnhart DC, Huber JT, Zobell S, Rollins MD. The morbidity of a divided stoma compared to a loop colostomy in patients with anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (01) 107-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chirdan LB, Uba FA, Ameh EA, Mshelbwala PM. Colostomy for high anorectal malformation: an evaluation of morbidity and mortality in a developing country. Pediatr Surg Int 2008; 24 (04) 407-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Langer JC, Fitzgerald PG, Winthrop AL. , et al. One-stage versus two-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease in the first year of life. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31 (01) 33-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Keckler SJ, Yang JC, Fraser JD. , et al. Contemporary practice patterns in the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (06) 1257-1260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Grosfeld J, O'Neill J, Coran A, Fonkalsrud E. Pediatric Surgery, 6th ed. Mosby; 2006: 1514-1559
    Google Scholar