Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2022; 35(04): 409-415
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715126
Original Article

Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty for a High-Volume Surgeon

Kevin B. Marchand
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
,
Joseph Ehiorobo
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
,
Kevin K. Mathew
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
,
Robert C. Marchand
2   South County Orthopaedics, Ortho Rhode Island, Wakefield, Rhode Island
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The learning curve has been established for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) during the first month of use; however, there have been no studies evaluating this on a longer term. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare operative times for three cohorts during the first year following adoption of RATKA (initial, 6 months, and 1 year) and a prior cohort of manual TKA. We investigated both mean operative times and the variability of operative time in each cohort. This is a learning curve study comparing a single surgeon's experience using RAKTA. The study groups were made up of two cohorts of 60 cementless RATKAs performed at ∼6 months and 1 year of use. A learning curve was created based on the mean operative times and individual operative times were stratified into different cohorts for comparison. Study groups were compared with the surgeon's initial group of 20 cemented RATKAs and 60 cementless manual cases. Descriptive numbers were compiled and mean operative times were compared using Student's t-tests for significant differences with a p-value of < 0.05. The mean surgical times continued to decrease after 6 months of RATKA. In 1 year, the surgeon was performing 88% of the RATKA between 50 and 69 minutes. The initial cohort and 1-year robotic-assisted mean operative times were 81 and 62 minutes, respectively (p < 0.00001). Mean 6-month robotic-assisted operative times were similar to manual times (p = 0.12). A significant lower time was found between the mean operative times for the 1-year robotic-assisted and manual (p = 0.008) TKAs. The data show continued improvement of operative times at 6 months and 1 year when using this new technology. The results of this study are important because they demonstrate how the complexity of a technology which initially increases operative time can be overcome and become more time-effective than conventional techniques.

Keywords

learning curve - robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty - knee - osteoarthritis


Publication History

Received: 30 October 2020

Accepted: 25 June 2020

Article published online:
24 August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH. et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Comput Aided Surg 2012; 17 (02) 86-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (03) 239-250
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Naziri Q, Cusson BC, Chaudhri M, Shah NV, Sastry A. Making the transition from traditional to robotic-arm assisted TKA: what to expect? A single-surgeon comparative-analysis of the first-40 consecutive cases. J Orthop 2019; 16 (04) 364-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kim S-M, Park Y-S, Ha C-W, Lim S-J, Moon Y-W. Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (09) e1334-e1339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A. et al. Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 849-853
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Liow MHL, Goh GSH, Wong MK, Chin PL, Tay DKJ, Yeo SJ. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2942-2951
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Liow MHL, Chin PL, Tay KJD, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Early experiences with robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the DigiMatch™ ROBODOC® surgical system. Singapore Med J 2014; 55 (10) 529-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int 2017; 30: 441-446
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckardt A. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (05) 573-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cool CL, Jacofsky DJ, Seeger KA, Sodhi N, Mont MA. A 90-day episode-of-care cost analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Comp Eff Res 2019; 8 (05) 327-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mont MA, Cool C, Gregory D, Coppolecchia A, Sodhi N, Jacofsky DJ. Health care utilization and payer cost analysis of robotic arm assisted total knee arthroplasty at 30, 60, and 90 days. J Knee Surg 2019. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695741. (Online ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (04) 1132-1141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS. et al. The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 17-21
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bhowmik-Stoker M, Scholl L, Khlopas A. et al. Accurately predicting total knee component size without preoperative radiographs. Surg Technol Int 2018; 33 (33) 337-342
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nam D, Lawrie CM, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same modern design: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (13) 1185-1192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sodhi N, Anis HK, Gold PA. et al. Operative times can predict and are correlated with lengths-of-stay in primary total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide database study. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (07) 1328-1332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MGE, Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2006; 2 (01) 70-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Coon TM. Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop 2009; 38 (02) 7-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Grau L, Lingamfelter M, Ponzio D. et al. Robotic arm assisted total knee arthroplasty workflow optimization, operative times and learning curve. Arthroplast Today 2019; 5 (04) 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002; 9 (03) 173-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Salem HS, Marchand KB, Ehiorobo JO. et al. Benefits of CT scanning for the management of hip arthritis and arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 2020; 36: 364-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M. et al. Does the robotic arm and preoperative CT planning help with 3D intraoperative total knee arthroplasty planning?. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (08) 742-749
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Casper M, Mitra R, Khare R. et al. Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2018; 23 (01) 14-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Shalhoub S, Lawrence JM, Keggi JM, Randall AL, DeClaire JH, Plaskos C. Imageless, robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty combined with a robotic tensioning system can help predict and achieve accurate postoperative ligament balance. Arthroplast Today 2019; 5 (03) 334-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shalhoub S, Moschetti WE, Dabuzhsky L, Jevsevar DS, Keggi JM, Plaskos C. Laxity profiles in the native and replaced knee-application to robotic-assisted gap-balancing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (09) 3043-3048
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar