J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(04): 380-384
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717152
Original Article

Microsurgery Fellowship Website and Social Media Presence: Are Programs Optimizing Recruitment Strategy?

1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Hannah C. Langdell
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Andrew Hollins
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ronnie L. Shammas
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Adam Glener
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Caitlin Marks
2   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Bernard T. Lee
3   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Brett T. Phillips
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Microsurgery fellowship applicants make decisions for future training based on information obtained from colleagues, mentors, and microsurgery fellowship program Websites (MFWs). In this study, we sought to evaluate the accessibility and quality of available information by microsurgery programs by analyzing the most commonly used web resources and social media outlets for applicants.

Methods The San Francisco (SF) Match and American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery Websites were queried in April 2020 for microsurgery fellowship programs (MFPs) participating in the SF Match. Twenty-two independent variables of information were assessed on MFWs based on previously published data. Social media presence was also assessed by querying Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter for official hospital, plastic surgery residency, and microsurgery fellowship accounts.

Results All 24 MFWs participating in the SF Match had a webpage. Program description, faculty listing, operative volume, and eligibility requirements were listed for all programs (100%). The majority of MFWs listed affiliated hospitals (75%), provided a link to the fellowship application (66.7%), listed interview dates (66.7%), and highlighted research interests (50%). A minority of MFWs provided information on conference schedule (37.5%), current fellow listing (25%), previous fellow listing (16.67%), and positions held by previous fellows (8.33%). No MFWs (0%) presented information on selection process, or rotation schedule.

All hospitals with an MFP had a Facebook page and nearly all had Instagram (83.3%) and Twitter accounts (95.8%). Plastic surgery residency programs at the same institution of an MFP had social media presence on Facebook (38.9%), Twitter (38.9%), and Instagram (66.7%). Only three MFPs had Facebook accounts (12.5%) and none had Instagram or Twitter accounts.

Conclusion As the field of microsurgery continues to grow, the need for effective recruitment and training of microsurgeons continues to be essential. Overall, we conclude that both the accessibility and quality of information available to applicants are limited, which is a missed opportunity for recruitment.



Publication History

Received: 17 June 2020

Accepted: 25 August 2020

Article published online:
29 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Imahara SD, Scott JR, Neligan PC. Career plans of graduating plastic surgery trainees in 2009: the impact of an uncertain economic climate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (06) 2173-2178
  • 2 Herrera FA, Chang EI, Suliman A, Tseng CY, Bradley JP. Recent trends in resident career choices after plastic surgery training. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (06) 694-697
  • 3 Hashmi A, Khan FA, Herman F. et al. A survey of current state of training of plastic surgery residents. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10 (01) 234
  • 4 Silvestre J, Vargas CR, Ho O, Lee BT. Evaluation of the content and accessibility of microsurgery fellowship program websites. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (07) 560-564
  • 5 Match Participants Microsurgery Fellowship Match. Accessed September 22, 2020 at: https://www.microsurg.org/fellowships/match_list/
  • 6 Microsurgery Fellowship SF. Accessed September 22, 2020 at: https://www.microsurg.org/fellowships/match_list/
  • 7 Hashmi A, Policherla R, Campbell H, Khan FA, Schumaier A, Al-Mufarrej F. How informative are the plastic surgery residency websites to prospective applicants?. J Surg Educ 2017; 74 (01) 74-78
  • 8 Surani Z, Hirani R, Elias A. et al. Social media usage among health care providers. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10 (01) 654
  • 9 Hu J, Zhen M, Olteanu C, Avram R. An evaluation of accessibility and content of microsurgery fellowship websites. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2016; 24 (03) 187-190
  • 10 Huang BY, Hicks TD, Haidar GM, Pounds LL, Davies MG. An evaluation of the availability, accessibility, and quality of online content of vascular surgery training program websites for residency and fellowship applicants. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66 (06) 1892-1901
  • 11 Silvestre J, Tomlinson-Hansen S, Fosnot J, Taylor JA. Plastic surgery residency websites: a critical analysis of accessibility and content. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (03) 265-269
  • 12 Silvestre J, Guzman JZ, Abbatematteo JM, Chang B, Levin LS. Evaluation of content and accessibility of hand fellowship websites. Hand (N Y) 2015; 10 (03) 516-521
  • 13 Shaath MK, Yeranosian MG, Ippolito JA, Adams MR, Sirkin MS, Reilly MC. Evaluation of the content and accessibility of web sites for accredited orthopaedic trauma surgery fellowships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (09) e60
  • 14 Mulcahey MK, Gosselin MM, Fadale PD. Evaluation of the content and accessibility of web sites for accredited orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (12) e85
  • 15 Silvestre J, Guzman JZ, Skovrlj B. et al. The Internet as a communication tool for orthopedic spine fellowships in the United States. Spine J 2015; 15 (04) 655-661
  • 16 Lagwinski N, Hunt JL. Fellowship trends of pathology residents. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133 (09) 1431-1436
  • 17 Perron AD, Brady WJ. Sources of information on emergency medicine residency programs. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9 (12) 1462-1463
  • 18 Renew JR, Ladlie B, Gorlin A, Long T. The impact of social media on anesthesia resident recruitment. J Educ Perioper Med 2019; 21 (01) E632
  • 19 Khatri C, Chapman SJ, Glasbey J. STARSurg Committee. et al. Social media and internet driven study recruitment: evaluating a new model for promoting collaborator engagement and participation. PLoS One 2015; 10 (03) e0118899
  • 20 Benedict C, Hahn AL, Diefenbach MA, Ford JS. Recruitment via social media: advantages and potential biases. Digit Health 2019; 5: 2055207619867223
  • 21 Azoury SC, Mazzaferro DM, Piwnica-Worms W. et al. An update on social media in academic plastic surgery training programs: the rising trend of likes, shares, and retweets. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85: 100-104
  • 22 Chandawarkar AA, Gould DJ, Stevens WG. Insta-grated plastic surgery residencies: the rise of social media use by trainees and responsible guidelines for use. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (10) 1145-1152
  • 23 Irwin TJ, Riesel JN, Ortiz R, Helliwell LA, Lin SJ, Eberlin KR. The impact of social media on plastic surgery residency applicants. Ann Plast Surg 2020; DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002375.