Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(02): 185-192
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721815
Original Article

Retrosigmoid Craniectomy with a Layered Soft Tissue Dissection and Hydroxyapatite Reconstruction: Technical Note, Surgical Video, Regional Anatomy, and Outcomes

Stephen T. Magill 
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Young M. Lee
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Roberto R. Rubio
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Minh P. Nguyen
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Carl B. Heilman
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Michael W. McDermott
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction There are many reported modifications to the retrosigmoid approach including variations in skin incisions, soft tissue dissection, bone removal/replacement, and closure.

Objective The aim of this study was to report the technical nuances developed by two senior skull base surgeons for retrosigmoid craniectomy with reconstruction and provide anatomic dissections, surgical video, and outcomes.

Methods The regional soft tissue and bony anatomy as well as the steps for our retrosigmoid craniectomy were recorded with photographs, anatomic dissections, and video. Records from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed to determine the incidence of complications after the authors began using the described approach.

Results Dissections of the relevant soft tissue, vascular, and bony structures were performed. Key surgical steps are (1) a retroauricular C-shaped skin incision, (2) developing a skin and subgaleal tissue flap of equal thickness above the fascia over the temporalis and sub-occipital muscles, (3) creation of subperiosteal soft tissue planes over the top of the mastoid and along the superior nuchal line to expose the suboccipital region, (4) closure of the craniectomy defect with in-lay titanium mesh and overlay hydroxyapatite cranioplasty, and (5) reapproximation of the soft tissue edges during closure. Complications in 40 cases were pseudomeningocele requiring shunt (n = 3, 7.5%), wound infection (n = 1, 2.5%), and aseptic meningitis (n = 1, 2.5%). There were no incisional cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

Conclusion The relevant regional anatomy and a revised technique for retrosigmoid craniectomy with reconstruction have been presented with acceptable results. Readers can consider this technique when using the retrosigmoid approach for pathology in the cerebellopontine angle.

Keywords

retrosigmoid - cerebellopontine angle - anatomy - neuroanatomy - CSF leak - suboccipital - retromastoid - hydroxyapatite - reconstruction


Publication History

Received: 12 March 2020

Accepted: 03 September 2020

Article published online:
22 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Lang Jr J, Samii A. Retrosigmoidal approach to the posterior cranial fossa. An anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 111 (3-4): 147-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Das P, Borghei-Razavi H, Moore NZ, Recinos PF. Posterior approach to Meckel's cave: retrosigmoid craniectomy with endoscopic assistance. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80 (Suppl. 03) S331-S332
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Liu JK, Dodson VN. Retrosigmoid suprameatal approach for resection of petrotentorial cerebellopontine angle meningioma: operative video and technical nuances. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80 (Suppl. 03) S290-S291
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Elhammady MS, Telischi FF, Morcos JJ. Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45 (02) 375-397 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mostafa BE, El Sharnoubi M, Youssef AM. The keyhole retrosigmoid approach to the cerebello-pontine angle: indications, technical modifications, and results. Skull Base 2008; 18 (06) 371-376
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yamashima T, Lee JH, Tobias S, Kim C-H, Chang JH, Kwon J-T. Surgical procedure “simplified retrosigmoid approach” for C-P angle lesions. J Clin Neurosci 2004; 11 (02) 168-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Aldahak N, Dupre D, Ragaee M, Froelich S, Wilberger J, Aziz KM. Hydroxyapatite bone cement application for the reconstruction of retrosigmoid craniectomy in the treatment of cranial nerves disorders. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8 (01) 115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pabaney AH, Reinard KA, Asmaro K, Malik GM. Novel technique for cranial reconstruction following retrosigmoid craniectomy using demineralized bone matrix. Clin Neurol Neurosur. 2015;136. Arch Surg 1934; 29: 66-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Della Pepa GM, Montano N, Lucantoni C, Alexandre AM, Papacci F, Meglio M. Craniotomy repair with the retrosigmoid approach: the impact on quality of life of meticulous reconstruction of anatomical layers. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (11) 2255-2258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Baird CJ, Hdeib A, Suk I. et al. Reduction of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after vestibular schwannoma surgery by reconstruction of the drilled porus acusticus with hydroxyapatite bone cement. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (02) 347-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tubbs RS, Fries FN, Kulwin C, Mortazavi MM, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol AA. Modified skin incision for avoiding the lesser occipital nerve and occipital artery during retrosigmoid craniotomy: potential applications for enhancing operative working distance and angles while minimizing the risk of postoperative neuralgias and intraoperative hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 32: 83-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hoshide R, Faulkner H, Teo M, Teo C. Keyhole retrosigmoid approach for large vestibular schwannomas: strategies to improve outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 44 (03) E2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fournier HD, Dellière V, Gourraud JB, Mercier P. Surgical anatomy of calvarial skin and bones--with particular reference to neurosurgical approaches. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2006; 31: 253-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Houseman ND, Taylor GI, Pan WR. The angiosomes of the head and neck: anatomic study and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (07) 2287-2313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rubio RR, Lawton MT, Kola O. et al. The middle temporal artery: surgical anatomy and exposure for cerebral revascularization. World Neurosurg. 2018;110. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26: e79-e83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 McKinnon BJ, Wall MP, Karakla DW. The vascular anatomy and angiosome of the posterior auricular artery. A cadaver study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (02) 101-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Benet A, Tabani H, Ding X. et al. The transperiosteal “inside-out” occipital artery harvesting technique. J Neurosurg 2018; 130 (01) 207-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Alvernia JE, Fraser K, Lanzino G. The occipital artery: a microanatomical study. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (1, Suppl): discussion ONS114–ONS122 ONS114-ONS122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lee JH, Oh TS, Park SW, Kim JH, Tansatit T. Temple and postauricular dissection in face and neck lift surgery. Arch Plast Surg 2017; 44 (04) 261-265
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zagzoog N, Attar A, Takroni R, Alotaibi MB, Reddy K. Endoscopic versus open microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2018; 131 (05) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kurucz P, Baksa G, Patonay L, Thaher F, Buchfelder M, Ganslandt O. Endoscopic approach-routes in the posterior fossa cisterns through the retrosigmoid keyhole craniotomy: an anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev 2017; 40 (03) 427-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Andrews JP, McDermott M, Jacques L. Lesser occipital nerve damage after retrosigmoid craniotomy repaired with processed nerve allograft. Interdiscip Neurosurg 2020; 19: 100592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar