J Knee Surg 2022; 35(11): 1223-1228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722662
Original Article

Knee Arthroscopy Prior to Revision TKA Is Associated with Increased Re-Revision for Stiffness

Ruben Oganesyan
1   Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Christian Klemt
1   Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
John Esposito
1   Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala
1   Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Liang Xiong
1   Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Young-Min Kwon
1   Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

This is an experimental study. As knee arthroscopy may be used as a suitable temporizing alternative prior to revision surgery, knee arthroscopy potentially may be a risk factor for subsequent adverse outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of prior knee arthroscopy on outcomes of subsequent TKA revision surgery. We identified 1,689 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA: (1) patients with no prior knee arthroscopy (n = 1,549) and (2) patients with knee arthroscopy prior to revision TKA (n = 140). A control group of matched revision TKA patients who did not undergo prior knee arthroscopy was identified (700 patients), using one-to-five matching. Matched patients with prior knee arthroscopy demonstrated an increased likelihood of requiring re-revision (odds ratio [OR], 2.06, p < 0.001), particularly for stiffness (OR, 2.72, p < 0.02) compared with patients who underwent revision TKA without prior knee arthroscopy. Knee arthroscopy demonstrated a time-dependent impact on revision TKA outcomes, with an increased likelihood of requiring re-revision for patients who underwent knee arthroscopy within 6 months prior to revision TKA compared with patients who underwent knee arthroscopy within 6 to 12 months prior to revision TKA (OR, 3.16, p < 0.04). This cohort matched study shows that patients who had prior knee arthroscopy demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood of requiring re-revision compared with patients who underwent revision TKA without prior knee arthroscopy. Additionally, there was a significant increased likelihood in requiring re-revision for patients who had prior knee arthroscopy within 6 months. This provides clinically useful information for counseling of patients who are considering temporizing their symptoms with knee arthroscopy prior to revision TKA.



Publication History

Received: 20 July 2020

Accepted: 29 November 2020

Article published online:
28 January 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Viste A, Abdel MP, Ollivier M, Mara KC, Krych AJ, Berry DJ. Prior knee arthroscopy does not influence long-term total knee arthroplasty outcomes and survivorship. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (12) 3626-3631
  • 2 Gu A, Malahias M-A, Cohen JS. et al. Prior knee arthroscopy is associated with increased risk of revision after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (01) 100-104
  • 3 Kim S, Bosque J, Meehan JP, Jamali A, Marder R. Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (11) 994-1000
  • 4 Hutchinson JRM, Parish EN, Cross MJ. Results of open arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (10) 1357-1360
  • 5 Wells VM, Hearn TC, McCaul KA, Anderton SM, Wigg AER, Graves SE. Changing incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (03) 267-273
  • 6 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 780-785
  • 7 Barton SB, McLauchlan GJ, Canty SJ. The incidence and impact of arthroscopy in the year prior to total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2017; 24 (02) 396-401
  • 8 Piedade SR, Pinaroli A, Servien E, Neyret P. Is previous knee arthroscopy related to worse results in primary total knee arthroplasty?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (04) 328-333
  • 9 Issa K, Naziri Q, Johnson AJ, Pivec R, Bonutti PM, Mont MA. TKA results are not compromised by previous arthroscopic procedures. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (02) 161-164
  • 10 Wong JWK, Yau PWP, Chiu PKY. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar symptoms in posterior stabilized total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2002; 26 (04) 250-252
  • 11 Koh Y-G, Kim S-J, Chun Y-M, Kim Y-C, Park Y-S. Arthroscopic treatment of patellofemoral soft tissue impingement after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2008; 15 (01) 36-39
  • 12 Amouzandeh G, Mentink-Vigier F, Helsper S, Bagdasarian FA, Rosenberg JT, Grant SC. Magnetic resonance electrical property mapping at 21.1 T: a study of conductivity and permittivity in phantoms, ex vivo tissue and in vivo ischemia. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65 (05) 055007
  • 13 Werner BC, Burrus MT, Novicoff WM, Browne JA. Total knee arthroplasty within six months after knee arthroscopy is associated with increased postoperative complications. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (08) 1313-1316
  • 14 Choi WC, Ryu K-J, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (05) 1512-1522
  • 15 Klemt C, Tirumala V, Oganesyan R, Xiong L, van den Kieboom J, Kwon YM. Single-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved functional outcomes: a propensity score matched cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (01) 298-304
  • 16 Fan Y, Xiao Y, Sabuhi WA. et al. Longitudinal model of periprosthetic joint infection in the rat. J Orthop Res 2020; 38 (05) 1101-1112
  • 17 Mehrani A, Ahmadvand P, Mehdizadeh Barforushi M, Mehrani K. Double functionalized nanoporous magnetic gadolinium–silica composite for doxorubicin delivery. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 2016; 26 (01) 226-232
  • 18 Brophy RH, Gray BL, Nunley RM, Barrack RL, Clohisy JC. Total knee arthroplasty after previous knee surgery: expected interval and the effect on patient age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (10) 801-805
  • 19 Newman ET, Herschmiller TA, Attarian DE, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP, Wellman SS. Risk factors, outcomes, and timing of manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (01) 245-249
  • 20 Vovos TJ, Lazarides AL, Ryan SP, Kildow BJ, Wellman SS, Seyler TM. Prior hip arthroscopy increases risk for perioperative total hip arthroplasty complications: a matched-controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (08) 1707-1710
  • 21 Raab GE, Jobe CM, Williams PA, Dai QG. Damage to cobalt-chromium surfaces during arthroscopy of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83 (01) 46-52
  • 22 Liu C-W, Kuo C-L, Chuang S-Y. et al. Results of infected total knee arthroplasty treated with arthroscopic debridement and continuous antibiotic irrigation system. Indian J Orthop 2013; 47 (01) 93-97
  • 23 Chen W, Klemt C, Padmanabha A, Tirumala V, Xiong L, Kwon Y-M. Outcome and risk factors associated with failures of isolated bearing exchange for osteolysis in well-fixed cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020:S0883-5403(20)30670-7