Semin Speech Lang 2021; 42(02): 117-135
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723843
Review Article

The Communication Benefits of Participation in Camp Dream. Speak. Live.: An Extension and Replication

Courtney T. Byrd
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Katherine L. Winters
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Megan Young
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Danielle Werle
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Robyn L. Croft
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Elizabeth Hampton
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Geoffrey Coalson
2   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
,
Andrew White
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Zoi Gkalitsiou
1   Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

School-based guidelines often require that treatment focuses on minimizing or eliminating stuttered speech. The purpose of this study was to examine the benefits of explicit training in communication competencies to children who stutter without targeting stuttered speech. Thirty-seven children (ages 4–16) completed Camp Dream. Speak. Live., an intensive group treatment program which targets the psychosocial needs and communication of children who stutter. Outcome measures included the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES), the Communication Attitude Test for Preschool and Kindergarten Children Who Stutter (KiddyCAT), and the Patient Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Peer Relationships Short Form (PROMIS Peer Relationships) and Parent Proxy Peer Relationships Short Form (PROMIS Parent Proxy). Pre- and posttreatment public presentations were rated on nine core verbal and nonverbal communication competencies by a neutral observer. Similar to previous studies, participants demonstrated significant improvements in communication attitudes (OASES) and perceived ability to establish peer relationships (PROMIS Peer Relationships), particularly school-aged participants (ages 7–16). Participants also demonstrated significant improvement in eight of the nine communication competencies. Findings suggest that, in addition to the psychosocial gains of programs such as Camp Dream. Speak. Live., children who stutter benefit from explicit training in communication skills, and these gains are not dependent on the presence of stuttered speech.

Financial Disclosures

No relevant financial relationships exist for any of the authors.


Nonfinancial Disclosures

The first author is the Founding and Executive Director of the Arthur M. Blank Center for Stuttering Education and Research, the Michael and Tami Lang Stuttering Institute, the Dr. Jennifer and Emanuel Bodner Developmental Stuttering Laboratory, and the Dealey Family Foundation Stuttering Clinic. No other nonfinancial relationships exist for the authors.




Publication History

Article published online:
16 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Craig A, Blumgart E, Tran Y. The impact of stuttering on the quality of life in adults who stutter. J Fluency Disord 2009; 34 (02) 61-71
  • 2 Boyle MP. Psychological characteristics and perceptions of stuttering of adults who stutter with and without support group experience. J Fluency Disord 2013; 38 (04) 368-381
  • 3 Tichenor SE, Yaruss JS. Stuttering as defined by adults who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62 (12) 4356-4369
  • 4 O'Brian S, Jones M, Packman A, Menzies R, Onslow M. Stuttering severity and educational attainment. J Fluency Disord 2011; 36 (02) 86-92
  • 5 Blumgart E, Tran Y, Craig A. An investigation into the personal financial costs associated with stuttering. J Fluency Disord 2010; 35 (03) 203-215
  • 6 Klein JF, Hood SB. The impact of stuttering on employment opportunities and job performance. J Fluency Disord 2004; 29 (04) 255-273
  • 7 Gerlach H, Totty E, Subramanian A, Zebrowski P. Stuttering and labor market outcomes in the United States. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2018; 61 (07) 1649-1663
  • 8 Byrd CT. Targeting Communication Competence in School [Video]. United States: Stuttering Foundation of America; 2019. . Accessed January 5, 2021 at: https://thestutteringfoundation.vhx.tv/
  • 9 Bajaj A, Hodson B, Westby C. Communicative ability conceptions among children who stutter and their fluent peers: a qualitative exploration. J Fluency Disord 2005; 30 (01) 41-64
  • 10 Boey RA, Van de Heyning PH, Wuyts FL, Heylen L, Stoop R, De Bodt MS. Awareness and reactions of young stuttering children aged 2-7 years old towards their speech disfluency. J Commun Disord 2009; 42 (05) 334-346
  • 11 Guttormsen LS, Kefalianos E, Næss K-AB. Communication attitudes in children who stutter: a meta-analytic review. J Fluency Disord 2015; 46: 1-14
  • 12 Langevin M. The Peer Attitudes Toward Children who Stutter scale: reliability, known groups validity, and negativity of elementary school-age children's attitudes. J Fluency Disord 2009; 34 (02) 72-86
  • 13 Vanryckeghem M, Brutten G. The KiddyCAT: a communication attitude test for preschool and kindergarten children who stutter. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, Inc; 2007
  • 14 Boyle MP. Relationships between psychosocial factors and quality of life for adults who stutter. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (01) 1-12
  • 15 James SE, Brumfitt SM, Cudd PA. Communicating by telephone: views of a group of people with stuttering impairment. J Fluency Disord 1999; 24: 299-317
  • 16 Kelso K. The relationship between communication apprehension, communication competence, and locus of control between stutterers and non-stutterers. In: Healey C, Peters H. eds. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Fluency Disorders. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen University Press; 1998: 246-248
  • 17 Klompas M, Ross E. Life experiences of people who stutter, and the perceived impact of stuttering on quality of life: personal accounts of South African individuals. J Fluency Disord 2004; 29 (04) 275-305
  • 18 Bricker-Katz G, Lincoln M, Cumming S. Stuttering and work life: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Fluency Disord 2013; 38 (04) 342-355
  • 19 Hayhow R, Cray AM, Enderby P. Stammering and therapy views of people who stammer. J Fluency Disord 2002; 27 (01) 1-16 , quiz 16–17
  • 20 Yaruss JS, Quesal RW. Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES): documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. J Fluency Disord 2006; 31 (02) 90-115
  • 21 Plexico LW, Manning WH, Levitt H. Coping responses by adults who stutter: part I. Protecting the self and others. J Fluency Disord 2009; 34 (02) 87-107
  • 22 Beilby J, Byrnes M, Yaruss J. The impact of a stuttering disorder on Western Australian children and adolescents. Perspect Fluen Fluen Disord 2012; 22: 51-62
  • 23 Daniels DE, Gabel RM, Hughes S. Recounting the K-12 school experiences of adults who stutter: a qualitative analysis. J Fluency Disord 2012; 37 (02) 71-82
  • 24 Davis S, Howell P, Cooke F. Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002; 43 (07) 939-947
  • 25 Hugh-Jones S, Smith PK. Self-reports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer. Br J Educ Psychol 1999; 69 (Pt 2): 141-158
  • 26 Byrd C, Chmela K, Coleman C. et al. An introduction to camps for children who stutter: what they are and how they can help. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2016; 1: 55-69
  • 27 Yaruss JS, Coleman CE, Quesal RW. OASES: Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience with Stuttering. McKinney, TX: Stuttering Therapy Resources, Inc; 2016
  • 28 Dewalt DA, Thissen D, Stucky BD. et al. PROMIS Pediatric Peer Relationships Scale: development of a peer relationships item bank as part of social health measurement. Health Psychol 2013; 32 (10) 1093-1103
  • 29 Byrd C, Hampton E, McGill M, Gkalitsiou Z. Participation in Camp Dream. Speak. Live.: affective and cognitive outcomes for children who stutter. J Speech Pathol Ther 2016; 1: 3-10
  • 30 Byrd CT, Gkalitsiou Z, Werle D, Coalson GA. Exploring the effectiveness of an intensive treatment program for school-age children who stutter, Camp Dream. Speak. Live.: a follow-up study. Semin Speech Lang 2018; 39 (05) 458-468
  • 31 Erickson S, Block S. The social and communication impact of stuttering on adolescents and their families. J Fluency Disord 2013; 38 (04) 311-324
  • 32 Blood GW, Blood IM, Tellis G, Gabel R. Communication apprehension and self-perceived communication competence in adolescents who stutter. J Fluency Disord 2001; 26: 161-178
  • 33 Olweus D. A profile of bullying at school. Educ Leadersh 2003; 60: 12-17
  • 34 Olweus D. Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: long-term consequences and an effective intervention program. In: Hodgins S. ed. Mental Disorder and Crime. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993: 317-349
  • 35 Blood GW, Blood IM. Bullying in adolescents who stutter: communication competence and self-esteem. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 2004; 31: 69-79
  • 36 Morreale SP, Cooper P, Perry C. Guidelines for Developing Oral Communication Curricula in Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade. Annandale, VA: National Communication Association; 2000
  • 37 Beebe S. Message from the president: our front porch. Spectra. 2013; 49: 3-22
  • 38 AC Nielsen Research Services. Research on employer satisfaction with graduate skills. Interim Report. Canberra, Australia: 1998
  • 39 Darling AL, Dannels DP. Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: a report on the role of oral communication in the workplace. Commun Educ 2003; 52: 1-16
  • 40 Mikkelson AC, York JA, Arritola J. Communication competence, leadership behaviors, and employee outcomes in supervisor-employee relationships. Busin Prof Comm Quar 2015; 78: 336-354
  • 41 Payne HJ. Reconceptualizing social skills in organizations: exploring the relationship between communication competence, job performance, and supervisory roles. J Leadersh Organ Stud 2005; 11: 63-77
  • 42 Scudder JN, Guinan PJ. Communication competencies as discriminators of superiors' ratings of employee performance. J Bus Commun 1989; 26: 217-229
  • 43 Hurst MI, Cooper EB. Employer attitudes toward stuttering. J Fluency Disord 1983; 8: 1-12
  • 44 Cream A, Onslow M, Packman A, Llewellyn G. Protection from harm: the experience of adults after therapy with prolonged-speech. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2003; 38 (04) 379-395
  • 45 Yaruss JS, Quesal RW, Reeves L. et al. Speech treatment and support group experiences of people who participate in the National Stuttering Association. J Fluency Disord 2002; 27 (02) 115-133 , quiz 133–134
  • 46 Venkatagiri HS. What do people who stutter want--fluency or freedom?. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52 (02) 500-515
  • 47 Morreale S, Moore M, Surges-Tatum D, Webster L. The Competent Speaker Evaluation Form. 2nd ed.. Washington, DC: National Communication Association; 2007
  • 48 Byrd CT, Croft R, Gkalitsiou Z, Hampton E. Clinical utility of self-disclosure for adults who stutter: apologetic versus informative statements. J Fluency Disord 2017; 54: 1-13
  • 49 Byrd CT, McGill M, Gkalitsiou Z, Cappellini C. The effects of self-disclosure on male and female perceptions of individuals who stutter. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2017; 26 (01) 69-80
  • 50 Byrd CT, Gkalitsiou Z, McGill M, Reed O, Kelly EM. The influence of self-disclosure on school-age children's perceptions of children who stutter. J Child Adolesc Behav 2016; 4: 296-304
  • 51 Collins CR, Blood GW. Acknowledgment and severity of stuttering as factors influencing nonstutterers' perceptions of stutterers. J Speech Hear Disord 1990; 55 (01) 75-81
  • 52 Healey EC, Gabel RM, Daniels DE, Kawai N. The effects of self-disclosure and non self-disclosure of stuttering on listeners' perceptions of a person who stutters. J Fluency Disord 2007; 32 (01) 51-69
  • 53 Riley G. Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults. 4th ed.. Tigard, OR: C.C. Publications; 2009
  • 54 Byrd C, Hampton E. Camp Dream. Speak. Live.: An Intensive Therapy Program for Children Who Stutter. Austin, TX: UT Copy Services; 2016
  • 55 RStudio. Integrated Development for R [Computer software]. RStudio, PBC, RStudio Team; 2020. . Accessed January 5, 2021 at: http://www.rstudio.com/
  • 56 Irwin DE, Gross HE, Stucky BD. et al. Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10 (01) 22
  • 57 Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand Stat Theory Appl. 1979; 6: 65-70
  • 58 Herbein E, Golle J, Tibus M, Schiefer J, Trautwein U, Zettler I. Fostering elementary school children's public speaking skills: a randomized controlled trial. Learn Instr 2018; 55: 158-168
  • 59 Corcoran JA, Stewart M. Stories of stuttering: a qualitative analysis of interview narratives. J Fluency Disord 1998; 23: 247-264
  • 60 Lowe R, Guastella AJ, Chen NTM. et al. Avoidance of eye gaze by adults who stutter. J Fluency Disord 2012; 37 (04) 263-274
  • 61 Plexico L, Manning WH, Dilollo A. A phenomenological understanding of successful stuttering management. J Fluency Disord 2005; 30 (01) 1-22
  • 62 Vanryckeghem M, Brutten GJ, Uddin N, Van Borsel J. A comparative investigation of the speech-associated coping responses reported by adults who do and do not stutter. J Fluency Disord 2004; 29 (03) 237-250
  • 63 Galati D, Miceli R, Sini B. Judging and coding facial expression of emotions in congenitally blind children. Int J Behav Dev 2001; 25: 268-278
  • 64 Matsumoto D, Willingham B. Spontaneous facial expressions of emotion of congenitally and noncongenitally blind individuals. J Pers Soc Psychol 2009; 96 (01) 1-10
  • 65 Shulman E. Factors influencing the variability of stuttering. In: Johnson W, Leutenegger RR. eds. Stuttering in Children and Adults. Minneapolis: MN: University of Minneapolis Press; 1955: 207-217
  • 66 Constantino CD, Leslie P, Quesal RW, Yaruss JS. A preliminary investigation of daily variability of stuttering in adults. J Commun Disord 2016; 60: 39-50
  • 67 Ambrose NG, Yairi E. The Tudor study: data and ethics. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11: 190-203
  • 68 Johnson W, Van Riper C, Davis D. et al. A study of the onset and development of stuttering. J Speech Disord 1942; 7: 251-257
  • 69 Byrd CT, Werle D, St Louis KO. Speech-language pathologists' comfort level with use of term “stuttering” during evaluations. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2020; 29 (02) 841-850