Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(08): 643-654
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723940
Original Article

Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis in Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema: A Short-Term Clinicopathological Analysis from Indonesia

Bayu Brahma 
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital–National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Rizky Ifandriani Putri
2   Department of Anatomical Pathology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital–National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Jauhari Oka Reuwpassa
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital–National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Yustia Tuti
3   Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dharmais Cancer Hospital–National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Muhammad Farid Alifian
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital–National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Rian Fabian Sofyan
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital–National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Iskandar Iskandar
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital–National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Takumi Yamamoto
4   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Locally advanced breast cancer is commonly found in Indonesia. In this group of patients, aggressive treatment such as axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) with or without regional nodal irradiation (RNI) will increase the risk of breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) in our patients. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has been established as a minimally invasive approach in lymphedema surgery. In this study, we report our first experience of LVAs in BCRL patients.

Methods This was a cross-sectional study taken from breast cancer patients receiving ALND with or without RNI. From December 2018 until June 2020, we collected and described general patient information, tumor characteristics, diagnostic methods, and the outcome of LVA. Postoperative subjective symptoms scores (lymphedema quality-of-life score [LeQOLiS]) and lymphedematous volume (upper extremity lymphedema [UEL] index) were compared with preoperative ones.

Results Seventy patients experienced BCRL with the mean age of 54.8 (9.4) years and mean body mass index of 28.1 (4.5). ALND was performed in 66 (97.1%) cases and RNI was given in 58 (82.9%) patients. Thirty-one (44.3%) patients were in the International Society of Lymphology stage 1, 24 (34.3%) in stage 2A, and 15 (21.4%) in stage 2B. The mean lymphatic vessel diameter was 0.5 (0.26) mm and 0.80 (0.54) mm for the vein. Lymphosclerosis severity was 7 (4%) in S0 type, 129 (74.1%) in S1 type, 37 (21.3%) in S2 type, and 1 (0.6%) in S3 type. In histopathology examination, S1 types were in lower grade injury, while S2 and S3 types were in the higher grade. Seven (53.8%) cases of S2 type showed severe fibrosis from trichrome staining. Postoperative LeQOLiSs were significantly lower than preoperative ones (5.6 ± 2.4 vs. 3.7 ± 2.6; p = 0.000). With the mean follow-up of 7.4 (3.7) months, the overall UEL index reduction was 9.2%; mean –11 (16.8). Postoperative UEL index was significantly lower than preoperative ones (117.7 ± 26.5 vs. 106.9 ± 18.5; p = 0.000). No complications were observed during this period.

Conclusion LVA reduced the subjective symptoms and UEL index in BCRL cases. Future studies using updated imaging technologies of the lymphatic system and longer follow-up time are needed to confirm our results.

Keywords

lymphaticovenular anastomosis - breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema - axillary lymph nodes dissection


Publication History

Received: 15 July 2020

Accepted: 15 December 2020

Article published online:
01 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Anwar SL, Raharjo CA, Herviastuti R. et al. Pathological profiles and clinical management challenges of breast cancer emerging in young women in Indonesia: a hospital-based study. BMC Womens Health 2019; 19 (01) 28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Harahap WA, Khambri D. Outcomes of breast cancer treatment in West Sumatera-Indonesia. Eur J Cancer 2018; 92 (Suppl. 03) S27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nguyen TT, Hoskin TL, Habermann EB, Cheville AL, Boughey JC. Breast cancer-related lymphedema risk is related to multidisciplinary treatment and not surgery alone: results from a large cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24 (10) 2972-2980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Taghian NR, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, O'Toole J, Skolny MN. Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2014; 92 (03) 227-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dean LT, Moss SL, Ransome Y. et al. “It still affects our economic situation”: long-term economic burden of breast cancer and lymphedema. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27 (05) 1697-1708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kung TA, Champaneria MC, Maki JH, Neligan PC. Current concepts in the surgical management of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (04) 1003e-1013e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000; 16 (06) 437-442
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nagase T, Gonda K, Inoue K. et al. Treatment of lymphedema with lymphaticovenular anastomoses. Int J Clin Oncol 2005; 10 (05) 304-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Yoshimatsu H. et al. Minimally invasive lymphatic supermicrosurgery (MILS): indocyanine green lymphography-guided simultaneous multisite lymphaticovenular anastomoses via millimeter skin incisions. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (01) 67-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M, Koshima I. Factors associated with lymphosclerosis: an analysis on 962 lymphatic vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (04) 734-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Doi K. et al. Indocyanine green-enhanced lymphography for upper extremity lymphedema: a novel severity staging system using dermal backflow patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (04) 941-947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Yoshimatsu H. et al. Dynamic indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography for breast cancer-related arm lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (06) 706-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Singhal D, Tran BN, Angelo JP, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Technological advances in lymphatic surgery: bringing to light the invisible. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (01) 283-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yang JCS, Wu SC, Chiang MH, Lin WC. Targeting reflux-free veins with a vein visualizer to identify the ideal recipient vein preoperatively for optimal lymphaticovenous anastomosis in treating lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (03) 793-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chiu DTW, Chung B. Reply: adipose tissue-preserved skin graft: applicability and long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (06) 982e-984e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hayashi A, Giacalone G, Yamamoto T. et al. Ultra high-frequency ultrasonographic imaging with 70 MHz scanner for visualization of the lymphatic vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (01) e2086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Giacalone G, Yamamoto T, Belva F, Hayashi A. Bedside 3D visualization of lymphatic vessels with a handheld multispectral optoacoustic tomography device. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (03) 815
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Executive Committee. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Lymphedema: 2016 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 2016; 49 (04) 170-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Hara H, Mihara M, Narushima M, Koshima I. Upper extremity lymphedema index: a simple method for severity evaluation of upper extremity lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (01) 47-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Suami H, Taylor GI, Pan WR. The lymphatic territories of the upper limb: anatomical study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (06) 1813-1822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Suami H, Scaglioni MF. Anatomy of the lymphatic system and the lymphosome concept with reference to lymphedema. Semin Plast Surg 2018; 32 (01) 5-11
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Seki Y, Yamamoto T, Kajikawa A. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema: three-line strategy for an optimal outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (06) e13-e14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yamamoto T. Comment: selection of anastomosis type for lymphaticovenular anastomosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (02) 207-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tsai PL, Wu SC, Lin WC. et al. Determining factors in relation to lymphovascular characteristics and anastomotic configuration in supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis - a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2020; 81: 39-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Sakai H. et al. Reply: targeting reflux-free veins with a vein visualizer to identify the ideal recipient vein preoperatively for optimal lymphaticovenous anastomosis in treating lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (05) 804e-806e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ng CH, Pathy NB, Taib NA. et al. Comparison of breast cancer in Indonesia and Malaysia--a clinico-pathological study between Dharmais Cancer Centre Jakarta and University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011; 12 (11) 2943-2946
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gillespie TC, Sayegh HE, Brunelle CL, Daniell KM, Taghian AG. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, precautionary measures, and treatments. Gland Surg 2018; 7 (04) 379-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14 (06) 500-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Shaitelman SF, Chiang YJ, Griffin KD. et al. Radiation therapy targets and the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162 (02) 201-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Leray H, Malloizel-Delaunay J, Lusque A. et al. Body mass index as a major risk factor for severe breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 2020; 18 (06) 510-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Choi JK, Kim HD, Sim YJ. et al. A survey of the status of awareness of lymphedema in breast cancer patients in Busan-Gyeongnam, Korea. Ann Rehabil Med 2015; 39 (04) 609-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Borman P, Yaman A, Yasrebi S, Özdemir O. The importance of awareness and education in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Cancer Educ 2017; 32 (03) 629-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pappalardo M, Cheng MH. Lymphoscintigraphy for the diagnosis of extremity lymphedema: current controversies regarding protocol, interpretation, and clinical application. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121 (01) 37-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cheng MH, Pappalardo M, Lin C, Kuo CF, Lin CY, Chung KC. Validity of the novel Taiwan lymphoscintigraphy staging and correlation of Cheng lymphedema grading for unilateral extremity lymphedema. Ann Surg 2018; 268 (03) 513-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tartaglione G, Visconti G, Bartoletti R. et al. Stress lymphoscintigraphy for early detection and management of secondary limb lymphedema. Clin Nucl Med 2018; 43 (03) 155-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Mikami T, Hosono M, Yabuki Y. et al. Classification of lymphoscintigraphy and relevance to surgical indication for lymphaticovenous anastomosis in upper limb lymphedema. Lymphology 2011; 44 (04) 155-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Maegawa J, Mikami T, Yamamoto Y, Satake T, Kobayashi S. Types of lymphoscintigraphy and indications for lymphaticovenous anastomosis. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (06) 437-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Vaqueiro M, Gloviczki P, Fisher J, Hollier LH, Schirger A, Wahner HW. Lymphoscintigraphy in lymphedema: an aid to microsurgery. J Nucl Med 1986; 27 (07) 1125-1130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Narushima M, Yamamoto T, Ogata F, Yoshimatsu H, Mihara M, Koshima I. Indocyanine green lymphography findings in limb lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (01) 72-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Fuse Y, Narushima M, Koshima I. Optimal sites for supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis: an analysis of lymphatic vessel detection rates on 840 surgical fields in lower extremity lymphedema patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (06) 924e-930e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Azuma S. et al. Near-infrared illumination system-integrated microscope for supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (01) 23-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hayashi A, Hayashi N, Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto T. Effective and efficient lymphaticovenular anastomosis using preoperative ultrasound detection technique of lymphatic vessels in lower extremity lymphedema. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117 (02) 290-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sumiya R, Fuse Y, Yamamoto T. Distinction between the lymph vessel and the vein on ICG lymphography: intradermal or subcutaneous ICG injection also enhances the vein. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (10) 1897-1916
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Visconti G, Hayashi A, Tartaglione G, Yamamoto T, Bianchi A, Salgarello M. Preoperative planning of lymphaticovenular anastomosis in patients with iodine allergy: a multicentric experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (04) 783-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Tartaglione G, Visconti G, Bartoletti R. et al. Intradermal-stress-lymphoscintigraphy in early detection and clinical management of secondary lymphedema: a pictorial essay. Clin Nucl Med 2019; 44 (08) 669-673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Yamamoto T, Yamashita M, Furuya M, Hayashi A, Koshima I. Mono-canalization of adhered lymphatic vessels for lymphatic supermicrosurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (11) e291-e292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto N, Yokoyama A, Numahata T, Koshima I. Multisite lymphaticovenular anastomosis using vein graft for uterine cancer-related lymphedema after pelvic lymphadenectomy. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2015; 49 (07) 195-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Yamamoto T, Giacalone G. Lymphatic vessel grafting for prevention of venous reflux into a sclerotic lymphatic vessel in supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (03) e67-e68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Yamamoto T, Giacalone G, Hayashi A. Microsurgical venous-branch-plasty for approximating diameter and vessels' position in lymphatic supermicrosurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (08) 1152-1153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Koshima I. Lymphatic vessel diameter in female pelvic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedematous limbs. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117 (06) 1157-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Kageyama T. et al. Supermicrosurgery for oncologic reconstructions. Glob Health Med 2020; 2 (01) 18-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Kageyama T. et al. Technical pearls in lymphatic supermicrosurgery. Glob Health Med 2020; 2 (01) 29-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Yamamoto T, Mito D, Hayashi A, Narushima M. Multiple-in-one concept for lymphatic supermicrosurgery. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (07) 588-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Kikuchi K. et al. Lambda-shaped anastomosis with intravascular stenting method for safe and effective lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (05) 1987-1992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M. et al. A modified side-to-end lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (02) 130-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M. et al. Sequential anastomosis for lymphatic supermicrosurgery: multiple lymphaticovenular anastomoses on 1 venule. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (01) 46-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto N, Narushima M, Iida T, Koshima I. Side-to-end lymphaticovenular anastomosis through temporary lymphatic expansion. PLoS One 2013; 8 (03) e59523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto N. et al. Modified lambda-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis with supermicrosurgical lymphoplasty technique for a cancer-related lymphedema patient. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (04) 308-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M, Yamamoto N, Koshima I. Split intravascular stents for side-to-end lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (05) 538-540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Yamamoto T, Koshima I. In situ vein grafting for lymphatic supermicrosurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (05) e142-e143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Yamamoto T, Chen WF, Yamamoto N, Yoshimatsu H, Tashiro K, Koshima I. Technical simplification of the supermicrosurgical side-to-end lymphaticovenular anastomosis using the parachute technique. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (02) 129-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Narushima M, Mihara M, Yamamoto Y, Iida T, Koshima I, Mundinger GS. The intravascular stenting method for treatment of extremity lymphedema with multiconfiguration lymphaticovenous anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 935-943
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Pereira N, Lee YH, Suh Y. et al. Cumulative experience in lymphovenous anastomosis for lymphedema treatment: the learning curve effect on the overall outcome. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (09) 735-741
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Darrach H, Yesantharao PS, Persing S. et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical management of postmastectomy lymphedema: a prospective quality of life investigation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (08) 606-615
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Cornelissen AJM, Kool M, Lopez Penha TR. et al. Lymphatico-venous anastomosis as treatment for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a prospective study on quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 163 (02) 281-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Wolfs JAGN, de Joode LGEH, van der Hulst RRWJ, Qiu SS. Correlation between patency and clinical improvement after lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) in breast cancer-related lymphedema: 12-month follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 179 (01) 131-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Cornelissen AJM, Beugels J, Ewalds L. et al. Effect of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in breast cancer-related lymphedema: a review of the literature. Lymphat Res Biol 2018; 16 (05) 426-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Forte AJ, Sisti A, Huayllani MT. et al. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis for breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema: a literature review. Gland Surg 2020; 9 (02) 539-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Salgarello M, Mangialardi ML, Pino V, Gentileschi S, Visconti G. A prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life following lymphaticovenular anastomosis for upper and lower extremities lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (09) 701-707
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Yasunaga Y, Yanagisawa D, Nakajima Y. et al. Water reductive effect of lymphaticovenular anastomosis on upper-limb lymphedema: bioelectrical impedance analysis and comparison with lower-limb lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (09) 660-666
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Mihara M, Hara H, Hayashi Y. et al. Pathological steps of cancer-related lymphedema: histological changes in the collecting lymphatic vessels after lymphadenectomy. PLoS One 2012; 7 (07) e41126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Sakai H, Fuse Y, Yamamoto T. Lymphatic vessel diameter and lymphosclerosis: two different characteristics. Lymphat Res Biol 2018; 16 (03) 317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Rodriguez JR, Fuse Y, Yamamoto T. Microsurgical strategies for prophylaxis of cancer-related extremity lymphedema: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 471-479
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Tummel E, Ochoa D, Korourian S. et al. Does axillary reverse mapping prevent lymphedema after lymphadenectomy?. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (05) 987-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar