J Pediatr Genet 2022; 11(03): 213-220
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723975
Original Article

CYP2D6 rs35742686 and rs3892097 Gene Polymorphisms and Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Relation to Disease Susceptibility in Kashmiri Children

1   Department of Biochemistry, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Akbar Masood
1   Department of Biochemistry, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Javid R. Bhat
2   Department of Clinical Haematology, Sher-e-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
A. S. Bhatia
3   Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Idrees A. Shah
1   Department of Biochemistry, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Bashir A. Ganai
4   Centre of Research for Development, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding The study was financially supported by Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India, under Women Scientist B (WOS-B) (SoRF) scheme via Letter No. DST/Disha/SoRF/PM/011/2013/C.

Abstract

CYP2D6 is one of the most widely investigated CYPs in relation to gene polymorphism. This study analyzed the relationship between CYP2D6 rs35742686 and rs3892097 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and potential risk factors in the development of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in Kashmiri children. We recruited 300 cases and 600 controls for genotyping and risk factors assessment. Genotypes of rs35742686 and rs3892097 were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. CYP2D6 expression analysis was done by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in ALL cases. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). High risk of ALL was observed in cases who carried the mutant genotypes of rs35742686 (OR = 18.15; 95% CI = 4.13–79.66, p < 0.0001) or rs3892097 (OR = 24.06; 95% CI = 10.23–56.53, p < 0.0001). Significant interaction was observed between rs35742686 and rs3892097 SNPs (P interaction = 0.001). The risk associated with the variant genotypes of rs35742686 and rs3892097 was retained in the cases whose fathers were smokers or had maternal X-ray exposure (p < 0.001). Relative messenger ribonucleic acid expression across genotypes was significantly decreased in cases carrying rs357426863 (*3/*3) (n-fold = 0.37 ± 0.156, p < 0.0079) and rs3892097 SNPs (*4/*4) (n-fold = 0.02 ± 0.0075, p < 0.0001) suggesting these two events are independent in ALL cases. The study concluded that rs35742686 and rs3892097 SNPs are significantly associated with ALL risk in Kashmiri children.



Publication History

Received: 13 August 2020

Accepted: 17 December 2020

Article published online:
19 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Inaba H, Greaves M, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet 2013; 381 (9881): 1943-1955
  • 2 Papaemmanuil E, Hosking FJ, Vijayakrishnan J. et al. Loci on 7p12.2, 10q21.2 and 14q11.2 are associated with risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet 2009; 41 (09) 1006-1010
  • 3 Vijayakrishnan J, Houlston RS. Candidate gene association studies and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica 2010; 95 (08) 1405-1414
  • 4 Belson M, Kingsley B, Holmes A. Risk factors for acute leukemia in children: a review. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115 (01) 138-145
  • 5 Anderson LM. Environmental genotoxicants/carcinogens and childhood cancer: bridgeable gaps in scientific knowledge. Mutat Res 2006; 608 (02) 136-156
  • 6 Tompkins LM, Wallace AD. Mechanisms of cytochrome P450 induction. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2007; 21 (04) 176-181
  • 7 Krajinovic M, Labuda D, Richer C, Karimi S, Sinnett D. Susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: influence of CYP1A1, CYP2D6, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms. Blood 1999; 93 (05) 1496-1501
  • 8 Olshan AF, Weissler MC, Watson MA, Bell DA. GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, CYP1A1, and NAT1 polymorphisms, tobacco use, and the risk of head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000; 9 (02) 185-191
  • 9 Eichelbaum M, Bertilsson L, Säwe J, Zekorn C. Polymorphic oxidation of sparteine and debrisoquine: related pharmacogenetic entities. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982; 31 (02) 184-186
  • 10 Sim SC, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Update on allele nomenclature for human cytochromes P450 and the Human Cytochrome P450 Allele (CYP-allele) Nomenclature Database. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 987: 251-259
  • 11 Fareed M, Kaisar Ahmad M, Azeem Anwar M, Afzal M. Impact of consanguineous marriages and degrees of inbreeding on fertility, child mortality, secondary sex ratio, selection intensity, and genetic load: a cross-sectional study from Northern India. Pediatr Res 2017; 81 (1-1): 18-26
  • 12 Rasool MT, Lone MM, Wani ML, Afroz F, Zaffar S, Mohib-ul Haq M. Cancer in Kashmir, India: burden and pattern of disease. J Cancer Res Ther 2012; 8 (02) 243-246
  • 13 Nida S, Javid B, Akbar M, Idrees S, Adil W, Ahmad GB. Gene variants of CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; outcome of a case control study from Kashmir, India. Mol Biol Res Commun 2017; 6 (02) 77-84
  • 14 Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT. et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br J Haematol 1976; 33 (04) 451-458
  • 15 Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R. et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016; 127 (20) 2391-2405
  • 16 Sambrook J, Rusell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2001
  • 17 Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001; 25 (04) 402-408
  • 18 Łapiński Ł, Agundez JAG, Wiela-Hojeńska A. et al. CYP2D6 gene amplification and the risk of acute myeloblastic leukemia. Pharmacol Rep 2007; 59: 167-172
  • 19 Lemos MC, Cabrita FJ, Silva HA, Vivan M, Plácido F, Regateiro FJ. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6, GSTM1 and NAT2 and susceptibility to haematological neoplasias. Carcinogenesis 1999; 20 (07) 1225-1229
  • 20 Joseph T, Kusumakumary P, Chacko P, Abraham A, Radhakrishna Pillai M. Genetic polymorphism of CYP1A1, CYP2D6, GSTM1 and GSTT1 and susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Indian children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004; 43 (05) 560-567
  • 21 Aydin-Sayitoglu M, Hatirnaz O, Erensoy N, Ozbek U. Role of CYP2D6, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTT1, and GSTM1 genes in the susceptibility to acute leukemias. Am J Hematol 2006; 81 (03) 162-170
  • 22 Silveira VdaS, Canalle R, Scrideli CA, Queiroz RGP, Tone LG. Role of the CYP2D6, EPHX1, MPO, and NQO1 genes in the susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Brazilian children. Environ Mol Mutagen 2010; 51 (01) 48-56
  • 23 Llerena A, Dorado P, Ramírez R. et al; CEIBA Consortium of Ibero–American Network of Pharmacogenetics & Pharmacogenomics RIBEF. CYP2D6 -1584C>G promoter polymorphism and debrisoquine ultrarapid hydroxylation in healthy volunteers. Pharmacogenomics 2013; 14 (16) 1973-1977
  • 24 Jin MW, Xu SM, An Q, Wang P. A review of risk factors for childhood leukemia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20 (18) 3760-3764
  • 25 Wiemels J. Perspectives on the causes of childhood leukemia. Chem Biol Interact 2012; 196 (03) 59-67
  • 26 Bartley K, Metayer C, Selvin S, Ducore J, Buffler P. Diagnostic X-rays and risk of childhood leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39 (06) 1628-1637
  • 27 IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Radiation. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2012; 100 (Pt D): 7-303
  • 28 Ribeiro KB, Buffler PA, Metayer C. Socioeconomic status and childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia incidence in São Paulo, Brazil. Int J Cancer 2008; 123 (08) 1907-1912
  • 29 Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S. et al. Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA 2005; 294 (22) 2879-2888