Semin Plast Surg 2021; 35(02): 078-087
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727271
Review Article

Revision Rhinoplasty: With Introduction of a Novel Preoperative Assessment Classification System

Austin Jiang
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Edward S. Chamata
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Fred J. Bressler
2   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Revision rhinoplasty presents several complex surgical challenges. Proper patient selection for revision rhinoplasty, along with thorough preoperative examination and surgical planning, is key to achieving ideal outcomes. Along with achieving a high level of understanding of primary rhinoplasty techniques, surgeons performing revision rhinoplasty must understand and diagnose deformities created by the primary surgery. A systematic approach to diagnosing rhinoplasty deformities assists in forming a suitable surgical plan. A classification system based on nasal analysis, described here, may be used to differentiate the degree of difficulty of the surgery as well as assist in surgical planning. Surgeons have a multitude of options available in their armamentarium for addressing common nasal deformities encountered during revisional surgery, and a stepwise surgical approach may facilitate the creation of an optimal aesthetic and functional result.



Publication History

Article published online:
08 June 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Kamer FM, McQuown SA. Revision rhinoplasty. Analysis and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114 (03) 257-266
  • 2 Sharif-Askary B, Carlson A, Van Noord M, Marcus J. Incidence of postoperative adverse events after rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 669-684
  • 3 Bouaoud J, Loustau M, Belloc JB. Functional and aesthetic factors associated with revision of rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (09) e1884
  • 4 Vuyk HD, Watts SJ, Vindayak B. Revision rhinoplasty: review of deformities, aetiology and treatment strategies. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000; 25 (06) 476-481
  • 5 Parkes ML, Kanodia R, Machida BK. Revision rhinoplasty. An analysis of aesthetic deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118 (07) 695-701
  • 6 Fung E, Hong P, Moore C, Taylor SM. The effectiveness of modified Cottle maneuver in predicting outcomes in functional rhinoplasty. Plastic Surg Int 2014; 2014: 618313
  • 7 Becker DG, Park SS. Revision Rhinoplasty. New York, NY: Thieme; 2008: 73
  • 8 Marcus P. Psychological aspects of cosmetic rhinoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37 (03) 313-318
  • 9 Veale D, De Haro L, Lambrou C. Cosmetic rhinoplasty in body dysmorphic disorder. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56 (06) 546-551
  • 10 Brucoli M, Baena RRY, Boffano P, Benech A. Psychological profiles in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery or rhinoplasty: a preoperative and preliminary comparison. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 23 (02) 179-186
  • 11 Adamson PA, Warner J, Becker D, Romo III TJ, Toriumi DM. Revision rhinoplasty: panel discussion, controversies, and techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (01) 57-96
  • 12 Javanbakht M, Nazari A, Javanbakht A, Moghaddam L. Body dysmorphic factors and mental health problems in people seeking rhinoplastic surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012; 32 (01) 37-40
  • 13 Paun SH, Nolst Trenité GJ. Revision rhinoplasty: an overview of deformities and techniques. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (03) 271-287
  • 14 Bagal AA, Adamson PA. Revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18 (04) 233-244
  • 15 Sachs ME. Mastering Revision Rhinoplasty. New York, NY: Springer; 2006
  • 16 Zijlker TD, Vuyk H, Adamson PA. Rhinoplasty: preoperative photographic analysis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1992; 17 (04) 361-369
  • 17 Rohrich RJ, Adams Jr WP, Ahmad J, Adams WP. Dallas Rhinoplasty. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Incorporated; 2014
  • 18 Singh P, Pearlman S. Use of computer imaging in rhinoplasty: a survey of the practices of facial plastic surgeons. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (04) 898-904
  • 19 Persing S, Timberlake A, Madari S, Steinbacher D. Three-dimensional imaging in rhinoplasty: a comparison of the simulated versus actual result. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (05) 1331-1335
  • 20 Moscatiello F, Herrero Jover J, González Ballester MA, Carreño Hernández E, Piombino P, Califano L. Preoperative digital three-dimensional planning for rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (02) 232-238
  • 21 Lekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton III GS, Hellings PW. Evolution of preoperative rhinoplasty consult by computer imaging. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (01) 80-87
  • 22 Gunther S, Guyuron B. Economizing the septal cartilage for grafts during rhinoplasty, 40 years' experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45 (01) 224-228
  • 23 Cárdenas-Camarena L, Guerrero MT. Use of cartilaginous autografts in nasal surgery: 8 years of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (03) 1003-1014
  • 24 Harris S, Pan Y, Peterson R, Stal S, Spira M. Cartilage warping: An experimental model. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (05) 912-915
  • 25 Gunter JP, Clark CP, Friedman RM. Internal stabilization of autogenous rib cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a barrier to cartilage warping. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (01) 161-169
  • 26 Lopez MA, Shah AR, Westine JG, O'Grady K, Toriumi DM. Analysis of the physical properties of costal cartilage in a porcine model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (01) 35-39
  • 27 Gibson T, Davis WB. The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 1957; 10: 257-274
  • 28 Mohan R, Shanmuga Krishnan RR, Rohrich RJ. Role of fresh frozen cartilage in revision rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 614-622
  • 29 Lee M, Unger JG, Gryskiewicz J, Rohrich RJ. Current clinical practices of the Rhinoplasty Society members. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (05) 453-455
  • 30 Toriumi DM, Bared A. Revision of the surgically overshortened nose. Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28 (04) 407-416
  • 31 Kamer FM, Churukian MM. High septal hemitransfixion for the correction of caudal septal deformities. Laryngoscope 1984; 94 (03) 391-394
  • 32 Daniel RK. Mastering Rhinoplasty. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2010
  • 33 Youssef A, Ahmed S, Ibrahim AA, Daniel M, Abdelfattah HM, Morsi H. Traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leakage following septorhinoplasty. Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 379-383
  • 34 Unger J, Roostaeian J, Cheng D. et al. The open approach in secondary rhinoplasty: choosing an incision regardless of prior placement. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (04) 780-786
  • 35 Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R. et al. The role of skin thickness in the choice of a rhinoplasty technique for thin-skinned patients: analysis of long-term results and patient satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (05) 1742-1750
  • 36 Cobo R, Camacho JG, Orrego J. Integrated management of the thick-skinned rhinoplasty patient. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (01) 3-8
  • 37 Cochran CS, Ducic Y, Defatta RJ. Rethinking nasal osteotomies: an anatomic approach. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (04) 662-667
  • 38 Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (02) 230-237
  • 39 Foda HMT. Rhinoplasty for the multiply revised nose. Am J Otolaryngol 2005; 26 (01) 28-34
  • 40 Teymoortash A, Fasunla JA, Sazgar AA, Fasunla J, Sazgar A. The value of spreader grafts in rhinoplasty: a critical review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269 (05) 1411-1416
  • 41 Gunter JP, Yu YL. The tripod concept for correcting nasal-tip cartilages. Aesthet Surg J 2004; 24 (03) 257-260
  • 42 Larrabee Jr WF. The tripod concept. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115 (10) 1168-1169
  • 43 Kridel RWH, Konior RJ. Controlled nasal tip rotation via the lateral crural overlay technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117 (04) 411-415
  • 44 Ghavami A, Janis JE, Acikel C, Rohrich RJ. Tip shaping in primary rhinoplasty: an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1229-1241
  • 45 Kridel RWH, Yoon PJ, Koch RJ. Prevention and correction of nasal tip bossae in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (05) 416-422
  • 46 Rohrich R, Raniere J, Ha R. The alar contour graft: correction and prevention of alar rim deformities in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2495-2505
  • 47 Kridel RWH, Scott BA, Foda HMT. The tongue-in-groove technique in septorhinoplasty. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (04) 246-256 , discussion 257–258
  • 48 Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: dorsal grafts and the designer dorsum. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (02) 293-300