Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2021; 35(02): 098-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727272
Review Article

Revision Breast Augmentation

Brad D. Denney
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Mountain Brook Plastic Surgery, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Alvin B. Cohn
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
3   Grotting and Cohn Plastic Surgery, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Jeremy W. Bosworth
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Pallavi A. Kumbla
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Breast augmentation is consistently one of the most commonly performed aesthetic operations every year. Unfortunately, revision rates following primary augmentation remain as high as 36%. There are several causes for revision breast augmentation; however, the most common and challenging of these include capsular contracture, implant malposition, and ptosis of the aging breast following augmentation. Successful management of these problems requires knowledge on how to best treat the implant and capsule with the corresponding soft tissue simultaneously. While surgical management is important, understanding the pathological causes of these entities during the primary operation can reduce the need for revision. This article utilizes the most up-to-date literature to review the appropriate clinical evaluation and surgical management of these complex cases.

Keywords

revision breast augmentation - secondary breast augmentation - capsular contracture - implant malposition - breast ptosis


Publication History

Article published online:
08 June 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. 2019. ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics. American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Brown MH, Somogyi RB, Aggarwal S. Secondary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 119e-135e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bachour Y, Bargon CA, de Blok CJM, Ket JCF, Ritt MJPF, Niessen FB. Risk factors for developing capsular contracture in women after breast implant surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (09) e29-e48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Flugstad NA, Pozner JN, Baxter RA. et al. Does implant insertion with a funnel decrease capsular contracture? A preliminary report. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (05) 550-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Graf R, Ascenço ASK, Freitas RDS. et al. Prevention of capsular contracture using leukotriene antagonists. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (05) 592e-596e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bachour Y, Verweij SP, Gibbs S. et al. The aetiopathogenesis of capsular contracture: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (03) 307-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ajdic D, Zoghbi Y, Gerth D, Panthaki ZJ, Thaller S. The relationship of bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (03) 297-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wagner DS, Mirhaidari SJ. Capsulectomy, implant exchange, and placement of acellular dermal matrix is effective in treating capsular contracture in breast augmentation patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (03) 304-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Calobrace MB, Stevens WG, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, Godinez T, Beckstrand M. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year Sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants, 4S): 20S-28S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tamboto H, Vickery K, Deva AK. Subclinical (biofilm) infection causes capsular contracture in a porcine model following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (03) 835-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Deva AK, Adams Jr WP, Vickery K. The role of bacterial biofilms in device-associated infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (05) 1319-1328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, Cope C, Chang L, Cossart YE. Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (05) 1605-1611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Adams Jr WP, Haydon MS, Raniere Jr J. et al. A rabbit model for capsular contracture: development and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (04) 1214-1219 , discussion 1220–1221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cunningham B. The Mentor Core study on silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) (Suppl. 01) 19S-29S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33 (03) 440-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) (Suppl. 01) 8S-16S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stevens WG, Calobrace MB, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, Zeidler KR, d'Incelli RC. Nine-year core study data for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (04) 404-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yalanis GC, Liu EW, Cheng HT. Efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine irrigation in reducing the risk of capsular contracture in aesthetic breast augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (04) 687-698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Adams Jr WP. The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 1892-1900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Hölmich LR. et al. Surgical intervention and capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (04) 343-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (09) 1165-1172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Somogyi RB, Brown MH. Outcomes in primary breast augmentation: a single surgeon's review of 1539 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 87-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Tebbetts JB. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (06) 1453-1457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q, Waisman JR, Silverstein MJ. The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (07) 1521-1533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB. et al. A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1300-1310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wixtrom RN, Stutman RL, Burke RM, Mahoney AK, Codner MA. Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (08) 956-963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lista F, Austin RE, Saheb-Al-Zamani M, Ahmad J. Does implant surface texture affect the risk of capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation and breast augmentation-mastopexy?. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (05) 499-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Adams Jr WP, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK. et al. Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42,000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (03) 427-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Adams Jr WP, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (7, Suppl): 46S-52S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Culbertson EJ, Felder-Scott C, Deva AK, Greenberg DE, Adams Jr WP. Optimizing breast pocket irrigation: the breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) era. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (06) 619-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hu H, Johani K, Almatroudi A. et al. Bacterial biofilm infection detected in breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (06) 1659-1669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jewell ML, Adams Jr WP. Betadine and breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (06) 623-626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ryan MP, Adley CC. The antibiotic susceptibility of water-based bacteria Ralstonia pickettii and Ralstonia insidiosa. J Med Microbiol 2013; 62 (Pt 7): 1025-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Drinane JJ, Chowdhry T, Pham TH, Ritter E. Examining the role of antimicrobial irrigation and capsular contracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lynch JM, Sebai ME, Rodriguez-Unda NA, Seal S, Rosson GD, Manahan MA. Breast pocket irrigation with antibiotic solution at implant insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (05) 1179-1186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Epps MT, Langsdon S, Pels TK. et al. Pocket irrigation and technique during reconstructive surgery: an American Society of Plastic Surgery Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82 (6S): (Suppl. 05) S427-S432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mladick RA. “No-touch” submuscular saline breast augmentation technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993; 17 (03) 183-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Newman AN, Davison SP. Effect of Keller Funnel on the rate of capsular contracture in periareolar breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (06) e1834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Calobrace MB, Mays C. An algorithm for the management of explantation surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (01) 1-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wan D, Rohrich RJ. Revisiting the management of capsular contracture in breast augmentation: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 826-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Swanson E. Open capsulotomy: an effective but overlooked treatment for capsular contracture after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (10) e1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hidalgo DA, Weinstein AL. Surgical treatment for capsular contracture: a new paradigm and algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (03) 516-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (02) 145-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving Natrelle 410 form-stable silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Kim YJ, Kim YW, Cheon YW. Prevention of implant malposition in inframammary augmentation mammaplasty. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (04) 407-413
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Chopra K, Gowda AU, Kwon E, Eagan M, Grant Stevens W. Techniques to repair implant malposition after breast augmentation: a review. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (06) 660-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD. Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (02) 549-556 , discussion 557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Salgarello M, Visconti G. Staying out of double-bubble and bottoming-out deformities in dual-plane breast augmentation: anatomical and clinical study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (05) 999-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Fisher J. Mastopexy without implant exchange. In: Fisher J, Handel N. eds. Problems in Breast Surgery: A Repair Manual. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014: 329-334
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Moliver CL, Sanchez ER, Kaltwasser K, Sanchez RJ. A muscular etiology for medial implant malposition following subpectoral augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (07) NP203-NP210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Wong MT, Cheong EC, Lim J, Lim TC. Creation of an intermammary sulcus in congenital synmastia. Singapore Med J 2007; 48 (01) e29-e31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Frame J. The waterfall effect in breast augmentation. Gland Surg 2017; 6 (02) 193-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (04) 567e-583e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Kolker AR, Austen Jr WG, Slavin SA. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (05) 667-673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Teitelbaum S. The inframammary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36 (01) 33-43 , v–vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (7, Suppl): 35S-45S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Derby BM, Codner MA. Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation: core data update and review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 113-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Zeidler KR, Pittman TA, Cohen R, Stevens WG. Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 38 (01) 38-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Spear SL, Little JW. 3rd. Breast capsulorrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81 (02) 274-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Chasan PE, Francis CS. Capsulorrhaphy for revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (01) 63-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Harris R, Raphael P, Harris SW. Thermal capsulorrhaphy: a modified technique for breast pocket revision. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (07) 1041-1049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Calobrace MB, Mays C, Wilson R, Wermeling R. Popcorn capsulorrhaphy in revision aesthetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (01) 63-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Voice SD, Carlsen LN. Using a capsular flap to correct breast implant malposition. Aesthet Surg J 2001; 21 (05) 441-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Yoo G, Lee PK. Capsular flaps for the management of malpositioned implants after augmentation mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (01) 111-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Nahabedian MY, Spear SL. Acellular dermal matrix for secondary procedures following prosthetic breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (7, Suppl): 38S-50S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Acellular dermal matrix in aesthetic revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (7, Suppl): 65S-76S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Spear SL, Seruya M, Clemens MW, Teitelbaum S, Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1047-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Hartzell TL, Taghinia AH, Chang J, Lin SJ, Slavin SA. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1711-1720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Davis C, Boyd C, Mateo de Acosta Andino DA. et al. Dermal autografts in breast reconstruction: a review of past and current trends. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (05) 618-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Colwell AS, Breuing KH. Improving shape and symmetry in mastopexy with autologous or cadaveric dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (02) 138-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Becker H, Lind II JG. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (05) 914-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Nair NM, Mills DC. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold internal support: preliminary experience with direct implant opposition during complex breast revisions. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (11) 1203-1213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Lesavoy MA, Trussler AP, Dickinson BP. Difficulties with subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty and its correction: the role of subglandular site change in revision aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 363-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Junior IM, Graf RM, Ascenço ASK. et al. Is there a breast augmentation outcome difference between subfascial and subglandular implant placement? A prospective randomized double-blinded study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (06) 1429-1436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. The neopectoral pocket in revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (04) 463-467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Spear SL, Dayan JH, Bogue D. et al. The “neosubpectoral” pocket for the correction of symmastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 695-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Grotting JC, Gardner PM, Cohn AB. Reoperative surgery following breast augmentation. In: Grotting JC. ed. Reoperative Aesthetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed.. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2007: 1261-1311
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Netscher DT. Aesthetic outcome of breast implant removal in 85 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (03) 1057-1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Graf RM, Closs Ono MC, Pace D, Balbinot P, Pazio ALB, de Paula DR. Breast auto-augmentation (mastopexy and lipofilling): an option for quitting breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (05) 1133-1141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Rohrich RJ, Parker III TH. Aesthetic management of the breast after explantation: evaluation and mastopexy options. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 312-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Efficacy of acellular dermal matrices in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery: a 6-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (03) 389-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Pozner JN, White JB, Newman MI. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (05) 681-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A. Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 1140-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Barker DE, Retsky MI, Schultz S. “Bleeding” of silicone from bag-gel breast implants, and its clinical relation to fibrous capsule reaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (06) 836-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Baker Jr JL, Chandler ML, LeVier RR. Occurrence and activity of myofibroblasts in human capsular tissue surrounding mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68 (06) 905-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Hwang K, Sim HB, Huan F, Kim DJ. Myofibroblasts and capsular tissue tension in breast capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (06) 716-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Del Vecchio D, Wall Jr S. Expansion vibration lipofilling: a new technique in large-volume fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 639e-649e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Abboud MH, Dibo SA, Abboud NM. Power-assisted liposuction and lipofilling: techniques and experience in large-volume fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (02) 180-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar