Download PDF
J Hand Microsurg 2023; 15(01): 059-066
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727297
Original Article

Running Interlocking Horizontal Mattress—A New Technique versus Modified Kessler in Extensor Tendon Injuries: A Comparative Study

Rohit Shaju
1   Department of Burns, Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India
,
Sunil Sharma
1   Department of Burns, Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India
,
Kshiteej Dhull
1   Department of Burns, Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Pursuit for a new technique, which could be placed on flat extensor tendons and strong enough to withstand the tension forces of early mobilization to prevent stiffness, started few decades ago. We evaluated the new technique of tendon repair using running interlocking horizontal mattress (RIHM) sutures followed by early controlled motion protocol in traumatic extensor tendon injuries and compared it to modified Kessler technique.

Materials and Methods We conducted a prospective randomized interventional study of 18 months' duration, with 30 patients. A total of 103 tendons were repaired, of which 58 were repaired using modified Kessler technique and 45 were repaired using RIHM technique. Postoperatively, patients underwent the early controlled motion protocol and the results were evaluated using the criteria of Miller.

Results Majority of the patients had excellent results (53.3%) and 46.67% had good results in the RIHM group while most of the patients in modified Kessler group had only fair results (80%), and only 20% had good results while none had excellent results.

Conclusion RIHM suture is an easy-to-learn and effective technique for tendon repair with comparable operative duration and with better overall result than modified Kessler technique.

Keywords

extensor tendon injury - running interlocking horizontal mattress - modified Kessler suture - early controlled motion


Publication History

Article published online:
13 April 2021

© 2021. Society of Indian Hand Surgery & Microsurgeons. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Neligan P, Warren R, Van Beek A. Plastic Surgery. 4th edition.. London: Elsevier; 2017: 227
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Miller H. Repair of severed tendons in the hand and wrist. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1942; 74: 693-698
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Doyle JR. Extensors tendons-acute injuries. In: Green DP, Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH. eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 4th edition.. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Churchil l Livingstone; 1999: 195-219
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Newport ML, Pollack GR, Williams CD. Biomechanical characteristics of suture techniques in extensor zone IV. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20 (04) 650-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lee SK, Dubey A, Kim BH, Zingman A, Landa J, Paksima N. A biomechanical study of extensor tendon repair methods: introduction to the running-interlocking horizontal mattress extensor tendon repair technique. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (01) 19-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Woo SH, Tsai TM, Kleinert HE, Chew WY, Voor MJ. A biomechanical comparison of four extensor tendon repair techniques in zone IV. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (06) 1674-1681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Altobelli GG, Conneely S, Haufler C, Walsh M, Ruchelsman DE. Outcomes of digital zone IV and V and thumb zone TI to TIV extensor tendon repairs using a running interlocking horizontal mattress technique. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (06) 1079-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Newport ML, Tucker RL. New perspectives on extensor tendon repair and implications for rehabilitation. J Hand Ther 2005; 18 (02) 175-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dy CJ, Rosenblatt L, Lee SK. Current methods and biomechanics of extensor tendon repairs. Hand Clin 2013; 29 (02) 261-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Matzon JL, Bozentka DJ. Extensor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (05) 854-861
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kleinert HE, Verdan C. Report of the Committee on Tendon Injuries (International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand). J Hand Surg Am 1983; 8 (05/02) 794-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Smith RJ. Factitious lymphedema of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975; 57 (01) 89-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chung KC, Jun BJ, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. The effect of the number of cross-stitches on the biomechanical properties of the modified Becker extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (02) 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dona E, Turner AW, Gianoutsos MP, Walsh WR. Biomechanical properties of four circumferential flexor tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (05) 824-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Silfverskiöld K, Andersson C. Two new methods of tendon repair: An in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (01) 58-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Uludağ A, Tosun HB, Çelik S. et al. Comparison of various tendon repair techniques in extensor zone 3 injuries: an experimental biomechanical cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140 (04) 583-590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Strickland JW. The scientific basis for advances in flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Ther 2005; 18 (02) 94-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chow JA, Dovelle S, Thomes LJ, Ho PK, Saldana J. A comparison of results of extensor tendon repair followed by early controlled mobilisation versus static immobilisation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989; 14 (01) 18-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Flynn JE. Problems with trauma to the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1953; 35-A (01) 132-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hauge MF. The results of tendon suture of the hand; a review of 500 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1955; 24 (03) 258-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dargan EL. Management of extensor tendon injuries of the hand. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969; 128 (06) 1269-1273
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kelly Jr AP. Primary tendon repairs; a study of 789 consecutive tendon severances. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959; 41-A (04) 581-598
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Newport ML, Blair WF, Steyers CM Jr. Long-term results of extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 1990; 15 (06) 961-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lovett WL, McCalla MA. Management and rehabilitation of extensor tendon injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 1983; 14 (04) 811-826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Verdan CE. Primary and secondary repair of flexor and extensor tendon injuries. In: Flynn JE. ed. Hand Surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1966: 220-275
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Elliott Jr RA. Injuries to the extensor mechanism of the hand. Orthop Clin North Am 1970; 1 (02) 335-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Diao E, Hariharan JS, Soejima O, Lotz JC. Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (02) 234-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wade PJ, Muir IF, Hutcheon LL. Primary flexor tendon repair: the mechanical limitations of the modified Kessler technique. J Hand Surg [Br] 1986; 11 (01) 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kim JB, de Wit T, Hovius SE, McGrouther DA, Walbeehm ET. What is the significance of tendon suture purchase?. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (04) 497-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Henderson J, Sutcliffe M, Gillespie P. The tension band principle and angular testing of extensor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (04) 297-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar